tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111653955715349434.post5366065093213697520..comments2023-08-04T00:31:05.621-04:00Comments on DFQ2: Michael Connell Was Never Threatened By Karl RoveTokyo Shemphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01764134901412321022noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111653955715349434.post-83471188553715041342011-11-24T17:23:50.906-05:002011-11-24T17:23:50.906-05:00Aye, the MSM haven't refuted claims I have foo...Aye, the MSM haven't refuted claims I have foot-long dangly bits. <br /><br />I rest my case. Owww! I put it on the danglies, you know.<br /><br />"Big" DaiBig Dai from the Valleysnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111653955715349434.post-39558445362868704352011-11-21T06:01:56.222-05:002011-11-21T06:01:56.222-05:00I have never claimed the ability to uncover whethe...I have never claimed the ability to uncover whether or not the 2004 election was electronically stolen.<br /><br />While I have nothing "new" on this blog pertaining to Brett Kimberlin and Brad Friedman, there was plenty deleted concerning them only because I didn't have the funds to prevent a default judgement.<br /><br />If facts that transcend myself as an individual aren't reposted in a way which won't defy a default inspired court order, they will not be readily available for anyone wondering wtf.<br /><br />Your first paragraph makes no sense considering what those facts are.<br /><br />What's weird was the amount of conspiracy bunk pumped out by Friedman, Kimberlin, and Arnebeck.<br /><br />You are fixated on something off-topic. You are avoiding the harsh truth of where every piece of this specific conspiracy theory originated.<br /><br />Non-coverage of "wild-eyed claims" in the "MSM" means something? Give me a break. What does that mean?<br /><br />Small planes crash. It was a coincidence.<br /><br />Your inability to prove 2004 black box voting has nothing to do with a conspiracy theory leading to donation boxes.<br /><br />You're conflating two topics, neither of which rises above the appearance of deliberately planted convolution. You are merely projecting your own impotence in regards to failing to present a narrative compelling enough to warrant MSM coverage.Tokyo Shemphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01764134901412321022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111653955715349434.post-37432917359148795632011-11-20T21:31:29.271-05:002011-11-20T21:31:29.271-05:00I was hoping you'd have some evidence either w...I was hoping you'd have some evidence either way, I didn't see anything new. Kimberlin's claims were never denied by Rove, just ignored - and it is weird that Connell died soon after the claim.<br /><br />If Connell's sisters feel the question is worth looking into, it's good enough for me. If Kimberlin was a convicted felon, serial exagerator, whatever fine - let's take his claims with a grain of salt - but it still doesn't mean they are not true.<br /><br />I think non-coverage in the MSM of these wild-eyed claims means something. There are many mysteries surrounding this case, but until these coincidences are explained, people on both sides will fill in the blanks based on their agendas.<br /><br />I still view all the questions about these threats, and all the speculation about whether Connell was murdered (or zapped by a direct energy cannon) as premature and unnecessary.<br /><br />The question we need to have answered before all these other distractions is much more simple. <br /><br />Was Connell, the long time loyal partisan IT guru for the Bush family and Swiftboat Vets secretly hired to design the system that would report the official vote tallies for Ohio? <br /><br />If so, can we discuss that conflict of interest before we move on to anything else? Whether or not the vote tallies switched over from TN, this would stink to high heaven and demand explanation by Blackwell and Rove. Why did you allow anyone involved with Bush's campaign near the vote counting apparatus? - gusAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com