DFQ2

Another Failed Attempt To Stifle 1st Amendment Rights To Freedom Of Speech And Expression

2012-01-30T16:51:00.000-05:00

By now ye know Brett Kimberlin's attempt to have me found in contempt of court fell more flat than a soda pop left open for a week.

What you may not be aware of is Brett got the court to issue a peace order against me. This is what the case file ordered on 10/13/2011 and expires on 04/13/2012 states:

SHALL NOT ABUSE
SHALL NOT CONTACT
SHALL NOT ENTER RESIDENCE
SHALL STAY AWAY FROM EMPLOYMENT

Hmmm. I've never done any of those things. Keep in mind that this is not a criminal case. The order was given by a family court.

Brett kimberlin failed to get Judge Jordan to order me to cease posting on this topic. Hence, everything I have posted since November 14th has been my way of setting the record straight. I didn't want anyone to be left wondering wtf I had written to end up in this situation.

While there is still plenty o'stuff for me to rewrite from the material deleted during the default era, I am pleased as punch feeling that most of the stuff I needed to get across has been posted. Thus, I have been able to move on with my life. I continue to be carefree and happy. Yay!!!!

Brett Kimberlin appears desperate for the truth to reside offline. Since he did snot accomplish his primary goal on November 14th to permanently censor me, he decided to go with the Plan B family court schtick. Kimberlin is adept at crossing t's and dotting i's. However, once he is actually at a hearing, his lack of attorney skills becomes quite evident.

On January 12th, Kimberlin submitted the following:

ORDER COMPELLING [ME] TO PERMANENTLY REMOVE BLOG POSTS

The COURT having found that Defendant [Me] has violated this Court's October 13, 2011 final Peace Order by continuing to harass Plaintiff, hereby ORDERS Defendant [Me] within five [5] days of the entry of this order to permanently delete the following harassing blog posts he made after the Court's final Peace Order as identified by the following url's:

I'll list those in a second but first read the judge's decision. His cursive writing was a bit difficult to read, but this should be very close if not exact to what he decided.

No action in ligent of impartial pending criminal charges, failure to allege contact by Perp with Petitioner and prior (11/17/11) referral of Petitioner to the Office of the State's Attorney.

That was decided on January 28th. One word sums that up: FAIL!

The truth is now known that I have committed no crimes. The only mistake I made was letting a dumbass lawsuit fall into default, because I was naive enough to believe a writ of summons had to actually be put in my hands.

Here are the recent blog entries Kimberlin wanted removed:

*** Patterico's Pontweetifications
*** Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin Wants Me Imprisoned
*** Motions Filed Against Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin
*** Incestuous Relationships Parts 1 and 2
*** Michael Connell Was Never Threatened By Karl Rove
*** A Quandary
*** Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin Wins Frivolous Lawsuit!
*** Sadistic Cybersmearing and the Roots of Blogging Fascism
*** No, I'm actually not a right wing operative
*** Is Brett Kimberlin Headed Back To Prison?

artwork by the lovely and talented Thusnelda

Hmmm. So it appears this lame story is starting to wind down. It appears Brett Kimberlin is running into nothing but brick walls in his attempts to have me imprisoned and censored.

As for Neal Rauhauser, I have read his words for the last time. Against my better judgement, I read one of his recent emails. That will be posted below. I have also been advised due to his Kookpocalypse schtick, that I should request a restraining order against him and contact the police. That being said, I do not fear that internet predator one bit.

Any more emails he cyberstalks me with will be filed away for potential further use. I don't suffer fools.

Removing my name from your blog?

Hey [Me],

Saw your post about filing a report - it would be enormously funny to forward your police department that crap you've written about me and have it entered as a matter of fact on the case. You know, I think so much of you as a human being that I am going to do that for you this evening - I'll post a screen shot of the mailer containing the CD, OK?

Ever given any thought to removing every single post you've got with my name in it and just going away before you get hauled into court again here in Maryland? It's something to consider.

Neal

--
mailto:nrauhauser@gmail.com//
GV: 202-642-1717

This douchebag is an internet predator, period. What he did to me at Daily Kos was criminal cybersmearing. You can't make up lies about someone and out their real name and address and have that be kosher.

So Neal, here's my reply, since I know you have no life and read every word I post. It's obvious your life's ambition is nothing other than to harass innocent people on the internet. The truth is now easily known about what you are, and that you are despicable. Oh, and say hello to my good buddy Johnny Cash. Loser.

50,000,000 Reasons Why Megaupload Was Seized

2012-01-25T17:55:00.002-05:00

From the not so reliable Wikipedia but perhaps accurate in this instance.

* Unique visitors: 81,000,000[citation needed]
* Page Views (in history): >1,000,000,000[10]
* Visitors per day: 50,000,000[10]
* Reach: 4%[11]
* Registered Members: 180,000,000[10]
* Once the 13th most visited site on the Internet[10]

First, lets look at the backstory through socratisation. The movie and music industries for a very long time have been part and parcel of corrupt capitalism. Fat pigs have been raking it in at the expense of fair play. Here are a few examples, starting off with some old-movie fetish.

With all due respect to Cary Grant, Clark Gable, Bette Davis, and Joan Crawford, they were not the be all end all for acting talent. Through development of the cult of personality, Movie moguls amassed huge amounts of dough off of those brand schticks.

Much more talented thespians never reached such heights of stardom. There were also many more gifted actresses such as Peg Entwistle who never had a chance. She tragically took her own life by jumping off the Hollywoodland sign. She definitely had some baggage to begin with, but it was the Hollywood star system which was the final straw in her making such a sorrowful decision.

Jump ahead and take a look at all the crap currently put out by Hollywood. There's a movie called Drive starring some untalented scrub named Ryan Gosling, and that flick is currently rated an absurdly high 8.1 at IMDB.com. It is pure crap. Only a complete idiot would shell out ten to fifteen dollars to watch such drivel.

The same is going on with music. A select few money sellers get pimped out, while millions or whatnot numbers of talented folks never get a chance to make it as musicians.

In short, the movie and music barons have had their bluffs called. We the people are sick and tired of their piss poor "products." The internet has enabled us to cut out the useless providers. They have asked for this backlash, since they pretentiously expected us to swallow their backwash. Nearly all of us would have been willing to pay for stuff, if uhm, the stuff was actually good. It isn't, so fock them. As the great philosopher Joseph P. Dirt once quipped, "It's all about the consumer."

So here came Megaupload with a different and more democratic vision. In a few years it was able to build up a big base of members and visitors. Its plan was to press forward with something called Mega Box. It was basically gonna give talented no-names the chance to finally become successful, an opportunity not allowed by the music industry.

This utterly freaked out the fat cats. And the movie industry was gonna be next in line for eventual obsoletion.

At the end of this mailed in entry are a bunch of links, so the reader can check out for herself what is being said by the zeitgeist. One numbnutted devil's advocate is saying, to paraphrase, "Oh, no way is this bottom line about Mega Box being a threat to the music industry."

Some people simply like the sound of their own voices. They get a cheap thrill out of being anal retentive contrarians in spite of the obvious.

There are tons of websites that could have been just as easily taken down. Megaupload was attacked, because they posed a serious threat to the music industry status quo. This specific seizure had nothing to do with piracy. Copyright law being the rationale is nothing less than a limited hangout.

The music and movie industries couldn't care less about we the viewers and listeners. This is why no one other than capitalist pigs and authoritarian personalities are sympathising with their plights.

The ptb's might have won this battle, but long-term they will fall flat on their fat fock faces. Masses of regular guys and gals will simply reorganise and develop the next Mega Box and Megaupload. Or perhaps that people empowering company will be able to fight back and reestablish itself.

Related Links
Was Megaupload Targeted Because Of Its Upcoming Megabox Digital Jukebox Service?

Why was MegaUpload really shut down?

/eyeroll
Today In Conspiracy Theories: MegaBox Is Why MegaUpload Was Taken Down

Eight Counts of Perjury and a Velvet Revolution Conspiracy Bunk Excerpt

2012-01-22T17:27:00.000-05:00

I hope this will be my last post on this unfortunate situation, until there is an update or resolution from Judge Rupp.

This blog entry will show in detail how Brett Kimberlin lied early and often on November 14th, 2011 after having been sworn in under penalties of perjury.

I've had enough of being this man's punching bag. I do not fear him nor any of his mickey mouse legal ploys.

Here's hoping Judge Rupp the Magnificent is busy soaking in every nook and cranny from the case #339254 file. The following are what I sincerely believe to be eight counts of perjury committed by Brett Kimberlin on November 14th.

This is what I would like to see happen. At a minimum, I want the judgement reduced to one dollar, with no court costs, and the removal of Jordan's court injunction Kimberlin refuses to accept is meaningless. I never defamed him. He got his chance to supply evidence on November 14th and presented squat. All I have been doing since then is expressing my 1st Amendment constitutional rights. No defaming. No breaking any fictitious interpretation of a sky is blue don't break the law Triple F order.

Best case scenario would be Judge Rupp reversing the default judgement and then the whole case as frivolous. I have provided him with two means by which to do that. Judge Jordan almost did so on Sept. 14th. However, he ruled that since Masachusetts' law allows for rent-a-cops to tape a writ of summons to one's door, that constitutes a legal service. I never saw that summons. But all the t's had been crossed with dotted i's, thus legally it had been delivered. In Maryland that wouldn't have counted. But Jordan was against me the whole way. He wasn't about to use his powers of interpretation to help my cause.

Nonetheless, since Kimberlin has messed up by having the case reopened, I have been able to write up motions pertaining to new discoveries. Massachusetts' service law states that a summons must be served with the seal on it or in the name of our glorious state. I forget the exact wording. The bottom line is it wasn't. Furthermore, Maryland's High Court has decided before not to accept another state's service law, since such "convenient" rent-a-cop procedures violate the 14th Amendment right to due process. We shall see how this turns out. I am not sure if there will be a next hearing, or whether Judge Rupp will simply make rulings without such a hearing.

Without further ado.

Eight Counts of Perjury

Count #1

The only things I actually said below are that Kimberlin has been apparently running confidence schemes with Brad Friedman of BradBlog in order to garner donations, and that BK has been convicted of domestic terrorism. I never said there was clear cut proof of pedophilia or murder.

That being said, his setting bombs did lead to Carl DeLong's suicide, and previous courts have agreed. Kimberlin's failure to pay up to the widow did lead to his parole being revoked in 1997. He didn't get out of prison until 2001. That's a far span of time from thirty two years ago. He was never exonerated for the Speedway bombings, despite that lie circulated through associate Larisa Alexandrovna claiming otherwise.

And Mr. [Socrates] took it upon himself to decide that we were fraudsters and criminals and pedophiles and murderers. And my partner is Jewish, and he made a post that Jews are the scourge of the Earth. And that Jews should die in the ovens. And he has called me a pedophile, a murderer, a fraudster, a con man, a terrorist. I mean the list goes on.

Count #2

Brett Kimberlin, Convicted Terrorist and Perjurer, Accuses Me of Unethical Conduct

Well, the Indianapolis Star thinks you were [a murder suspect]:
When police began looking for a motive in the Scyphers slaying, they found there'd been a recent family clash. Julia Scyphers' daughter, Sandra Barton, had become involved with a man who seemed to Mrs. Scyphers to be inordinately close to one of Barton's young daughters. Mrs. Scyphers told friends she was so concerned that she'd arranged for both of her granddaughters to come live with her. Whether or not Mrs. Scyphers' fears were correct (no charges were ever filed to that effect), this incident led investigators to start looking at Brett C. Kimberlin.
And so did Mark Singer:
Early that afternoon, [Brett] Kimberlin went downtown to meet with Forrest Bowman. Along the way, he said, he passed a newspaper vending machine and saw the Indianapolis News's proclamation BOMBING SUSPECT IS LINKED TO MURDER.

"I saw this headline about the bombing investigation and I bought a newspaper and started reading it," he told me [reporter Mark Singer]. "I think: Oh, this might be interesting. And then I read the first couple of paragraphs--about a Broad Ripple business man--and I realize they're talking about me and I'm just floored."

Mark Singer, Citizen K: The Deeply Weird American Journey of Brett Kimberlin (1996), page 98.

Me: Well, what I'm trying to ask is what did, is there anything I posted that hadn't been posted before in mainstream media? And what would that have included? Such as that you were a murder suspect in the death of Julia Scyphers.
JJ: Is that a question, whether there were prior posting of allegations? Is that your question?
Me: Is there anything, Yes.
BK: That's never been posted before to my knowledge.
Me: It wasn't written about by Mark Singer of The New Yorker?
BK: Never heard of that.
Me: You never heard of Mark Singer?
BK: I said I never heard that.
Me: You never, you never knew that you were a [BK: I was not] You're saying you weren't a suspect in the murder of Julia Scyphers?
BK: I was never a suspect, no.
Me: You were never a suspect? [JJ: What he said.]

Count #3

Head of Non-Profit Undergoes Actual Waterboarding and Torture; Video on YouTube

WASHINGTON, Nov. 1 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Is waterboarding torture? Brett Kimberlin, the Director of Justice Through Music, a DC based non-profit dedicated to peace, wanted to know and to show the public actual waterboarding and torture. He therefore agreed to be the subject of a music video featuring various means of torture used by U.S. officials and military personnel over the past few years.

The video was filmed in the winter at an abandoned prison under actual conditions. He told his "captors" not to hold back, and to make it real. The video, now on YouTube at http://youtube.com/watch?v=p2yOzV0BPMs, is called "Exile" and it is a scathing indictment of torture and extreme rendition complete with hoods, guns, handcuffs, hanging, deprivation and humiliation. It has been viewed over 20,000 times on various Internet sites since its release a few months ago.

Me: Did you or did you not waterboard yourself as a publicity stunt or for some type of, to make a political statement to the public on a controversial issue?
BK: I didn't waterboard myself.
Me: You didn't waterboard yourself? [BK: No.]

Count#4

The Wizard of Odd By Massimo Calabresi Friday, Jan. 05, 2007

Time Photo Illustration: Kimberlin:
Chriss Wade for Time; Voting Machine:
Brent Humphreys / Redux for Time

In the belly of the voting-reform movement is a man who personifies this paradoxical lack of credibility in the service of a credible cause. Brett Kimberlin was convicted in 1981 of a series of bombings in Indiana. By his own account, he dealt "many, many tons" of marijuana in the 1970s. Most famously, he is the man who from his prison cell alleged that as a law student Dan Quayle bought marijuana from him. Quayle repeatedly denied the charge, and it was never substantiated. In e-mails and Web postings from Kimberlin's two organizations, Justice Through Music and Velvet Revolution, he intersperses occasionally useful pieces of information about the problems of e-voting with a hefty portion of bunk, repeatedly asserting as fact things that are not true. Kimberlin, in short, is an unlikely candidate to affect an important issue of public policy.

And yet he has. Kimberlin has found a home in the blogosphere, digging up and disseminating an indiscriminate gush of anti-e-voting material. In turn, a loose network of lawyers, congressional staff members and academics have filtered that torrent, verifying and using parts of it for their cause, many of them without knowing Kimberlin's background. Most notably, he played a key, behind-the-scenes role in a Princeton study issued last September that Norm Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute says "caused a significant alteration in the debate" over e-voting. The office of Rush Holt, the leading congressional advocate of reform, has called Kimberlin "influential" in the movement.

Me: Yes, sir. Uhm, do you think private individuals get mentioned, uhm, are you aware of The Wizard of Odd article from Time Magazine on yourself?
BK: Yes.
Me: Do you think this is the type of thing that a private, that's done, type of article that's written about private individuals?
BK: Private individuals get written about all the time.
Me: Uh-huh.
BK: It doesn't matter if you have an article written about you that you're not, that you're a public figure. I'm not a public figure.
Me: Have you, have you emerged as a public player in controversial issues?
BK: No.
Me: Such as election fraud?
BK: No.

Count #5

From a Brad Friedman "article" titled, GOP Tech Guru Mike Connell 'High IQ Forrest Gump...At Scene of Every Single Crime' Say Ohio Attorneys

After last week's presser, Velvet Revolution's Brett Kimberlin sat down to follow up with Arnebeck and attorney/investigative journalist Bob Fitrakis, who participated in both the original '04 election lawsuits and has reported in detail on the related matters continuously since then at the Columbus Free Press.

VR Speaks to Ohio Lawyers About Karl Rove and Election Fraud

BK: Judge, I think he's asking if I've ever interviewed anyone? [JJ: hm-hm] I assume. I have interviewed people, and those interviews are online.
JJ: Okay.
BK: But they're not, there's never a picture of me. I'm just a voice interviewing a Congress member or a lawyer or a
JJ: Are you identified on them?
BK: No.
JJ: By name or anything?
BK: Never.
Me: I think that needs to be verified.

Count #6

StarFiles: The Speedway Bombings, Part 2

Kimberlin was paroled in 1994 after serving about 13 years of his 50-year sentence. But when he made no effort to pay the DeLong judgment his parole was revoked in 1997 and he went back to prison for about four more years, released again in 2001.

2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 28795,*
Brett C. Kimberlin, Appellant v. United States Parole Commission, Appellee

SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Rehearing denied by Kimberlin v. United States Parole Comm'n, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13886 (D.C. Cir., July 6, 2004) ...

OPINION

[*2] The district court correctly concluded that appellant's habeas petition is moot. In his petition appellant challenged decisions of the United States Parole Commission (USPC) revoking his parole and delaying his reparole...

Also, see
KIMBERLIN v. DEWALT 12 F.Supp.2d 487 (1998)

Me: 32 years ago, uhm, would more recently than 32 years ago were you sent back to prison for a parole violation?
BK: No. No. I'm not on parole. You keep telling people
Me: No.
JJ: One second.
BK: He's telling people I'm on parole. I'm not on parole.
Me: I don't know if he's on parole. I apologise.
JJ: You can't talk over each other.
BK: Well ...
JJ: Next question.
Me: More recently than 32 years ago, from your original trial if that's the date you're getting to, were you released
BK: I am not on parole.
Me: Were you released and then sent back to prison for a parole violation for failure to pay compensation to uh, Mrs. Delong, the wife of Carl Delong, who took his own life after those bombs tore off half his body?
BK: No, I wasn't.

Count #7

[email excerpt sent by me to Brett Kimberlin asking him to stop emailing me (January 14th, 2011)]

[email excerpt by me sent to the Speedway Bomber on October 11th, 2011 asking him yet again to stop emailing me.]

[Harassing email sent by Brett Kimberlin to myself on October 8th, 2011.]

Now read what he said under oath on November 14th.

Me: So, uh, let's go with stalking. How, did, did I recently contact you?
BK: Yes.
Me: By email?
BK: By mail.
Me: What about by email?
BK: Nope.
Me: I didn't recently write you an email?
BK: Never.
Me: Did you recently write me an email, after I had asked you not to?
BK: Nope
Me: No?
JJ: He answered no, just
Me: I would like to
JJ: You can testify, when you, when it's your turn to testify. Just ask the questions.
Me: He just per-, I contend that he perjured himself.
JJ: Just ask questions.

Count #8

It is outside of access to open source information to confirm or rebuke Kimberlin's claim of being exonerated for the Speedway bombings. Common sense says that there was never any "double secret" exoneration agreement made between Brett Coleman Kimberlin and the U.S. Justice Department.

You know, I had a fifty year sentence for something I didn't do. And it's been resolved. They, they don't have me on parole. I have no committment at all to that old case....

Me: Uhm, so part of the damage that I've caused you, uhm, you believe is because, are you claiming because I blogged about you claiming you were an exonerated, did you ever claim that you were an exonerated, uh, political prisoner?
BK: I've never claimed that publically.
Me: You, you deny setting the bombs that you were convicted of?
BK: Absolutely.
Me: And
BK: Absolutely.
Me: you admit you weren't exonerated?
BK: Judge, Mr. [Socrates]
JJ: Just answer the question because
BK: Mr. [Socrates] is trying to get into a lawsuit that was filed against the Department of Justice. It was settled in a confidentiality agreement, and I'm not going to discuss it. I'm gonna object.

(later on in his closing statement)

You know, and, and he talks about, you know, I haven't been exonerated. Well, he doesn't know what happened with the Justice Department lawsuit. He doesn't know. But he goes out and says, I know he's never been exonerated and all this stuff. Well, I'm not getting into that here. You know, but I can tell you for a fact and everybody here, I'm not on parole. I had a 50 year sentence. I'm no longer serving that sentence. So something happened, and that's as far as I'm going to go with that.

Velvet Revolution Conspiracy Bunk Excerpt

(pdf) I, Brett C. Kimberlin, under penalty of perjury pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1746, declare[s] that the following is true and correct.

This concerned their motion to lift the stay in the King Lincoln case to allow them to subpoena Michael Connell. The subject of this news conference was widely disseminated over the blogosphere, including news that Karl Rove was being targeted as the principal perpetrator in a state RICO claim, and that Michael Connell was a key witness in this claim. VR created the web site Rovecybergate.com as a vehicle to keep people informed, build interest and solicit and receive funds to support the Ohio litigation in federal court. VR has been involved in several other election related lawsuits in the past.

I have received five tips since July 17, 2008 from an unidentified person that I have named "the tipster” and who I will say is “he" in this declaration. He said that he is close to the McCain campaign and that he knows of Michael Connell and details that bear on the King Lincoln Bronzeville v Blackwell case pending in Ohio. Paragraphs 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 below deal with each of those tips.

8. July 19, 2008-You are "right on the money about Connell and Rove stealing the election." However, Rove has protected himself with a go-between, I won't tell you who it is. Connell has been designated a ”limited hangout" and the Administration will not protect him. I am not calling you because l want to be a hero, this is something personal between me and McCain. Rove has something on Connell's wife, or at least they can allege that Heather Connell was
involved with some money laundering involving a foreigner (and he used the name Kirby, either as an individual or company). lf Connell does not take the fall for this, Heather will be prosecuted for money laundering. I am going to give you a riddle and Spoonamore should know what it means: McCain is focused on six dot, dot, dot and then dot, dot, dot.

9. July 21, 2008- The go between is Jeff, the guy who runs SmartTech in Chattanooga. He is Rove's secret weapon and he is the firewall between Connell and Rove. Don't get fixated on Ohio, this scheme has ties to Enterprise, Alabama.

10. September 18, 2008- Spoon has ”opened a shit storm," but that they ”are still doing what they planned." (ie rig the election) Connell is in danger from Rove. Connell will talk if we can get to him.

11. October 1, 2008--People are nervous, Connell will take the fall, the system that Connell created is still in place in Ohio, ”They only changed the scenery. Not the stage." Connell has been reading the articles and they are strong.

12. October 22, 2008, Jeff Averbeck has ten teams working under him with a lead person and that each team is assigned a different state. Karl Rove is controlling the entire operation but there are firewalls between him and the teams. The "team leads" are expected to converge on Chattanooga before the election to tweak their election plans. SmartTech receives funds and then divides some of those funds between the teams and these funds are "federal funds." SmartTech has a plethora of front companies covering for these teams but I do not know their names. Some of them are somehow affiliated with or have done work for the Oakridge Testing Facility and the Tennessee Valley Authority. The teams are separate in case one or more gets taken down the others will continue their work.

The Thrilling Conclusion of Thrilla in Vanilla

2012-01-19T07:24:00.000-05:00

I dominated this thingie from start to finish, yet in the final minutes Judge Jordan showed that he hadn't been paying attention.

He has an authoritarian personality. People like that have a natural disdain for INFP's such as myself, one of the idealist dreamers. It's now on the public record that he listened to the most utter bullshite imaginable and let it slide.

He's got to be one of the worst judges I've ever come across. The only one I can think of worse than him was the South African dude Biko clobbered. I don't remember his name, because I read that book a couple decades ago.

The only judges I know of are those from tv and movies I can barely remember. I guess Jordan is a better judge than the one Pacino shouted at, "You're out of order. This whole trial's out of order."

Jordan is definitely nowhere as good a judge as the one My Cousin Vinny went up against, the Herman Munster dude. Hey Jordan, if you're reading this, hey buddy, buy a ticket for the next clue train and don't go back to Rockville and waste another year of the taxpayers' money.

As for Kimberlin, we now know how things turned out for him in the Thrilla in Vanilla.

I'll also add this. Donkeytale is waaay off-base thinking this thingie was anything other than Rumble in the Jungle. The heavy hitting, nutroot e-thugs came after me. Kimberlin came after me. For months on end, I went rope-a-dope.

Now who's having the last laugh? Hey Triple F, when you finally get caught up reading about the Michael Connell Threatened by Karl Rove hoax, or how Kimberlin perjured himself multiple times under your watch, yet you were still giving me shite up to the very end, you're gonna feel like a completely overprivileged, vanilla, self-righteous, full of yourself, not as important as you think you are idiot.

I'm a bad man. I'm on top of the zeitgeist. And so is donkeytale. p:>

Notes

*** At the beginning here, I mention how Daily Kos, Democratic Underground, and BradBlog are closely associated, and how it's unlikely the judge would have a clue. But then he said he knew what I was talking about. Wtf?

*** People shouldn't stop giving money to Velvet Revolution because of Brett Kimberlin. They should stop giving money to them, because they run wild hoaxes and never adequately explain what they have ever actually accomplished with the apparent millions they have raked in.

*** Brett Kimberlin kept going on and on and on and on and on and on and on some more about how I was dredging up something from 32 years ago. He said he never had a parole violation. The dude was lying out of his ass or utterly delusional. Exonerated? I highly doubt that.

And if the Maryland court doesn't charge him with perjury, imho, they will be in collusion with Brett Kimberlin. His parole was clearly revoked, and he didn't get out of prison until 2000 or 2001.

Brett Kimberlin has made a major mistake. If I was him, I'd plead insanity. If he's mentally ill, then he needs help.

Sometimes people are truly delusional. I saw this flick A Beautiful Mind, a true story, and the main dude did see things that simply weren't true. That could be what's going on here.

*** I wish ye could have heard that dude's voice to go with the text. It was pretty wild to experience; the intonations, the drama, the perjury, the lack of even one bit of evidence to back his case, the delusion that a default judgement actually meant anything other than a non-win win.

I'm very proud of having exposed him and Brad Friedman of BradBlog and others on so many levels. Someone had to do it.

*** Check out Judge Jordan at the end stick his butt into my final statement. What a pretentious, self-righteous, know-it-all bugger. I was hitting my final statement stride.

Why didn't Jordan check to see if Kimberlin had perjured himself? Is it because he's a hack or worse? On Sept. 14th, Jordan said I could request a new judge, and I did. Yet there he was ready to go, when I showed up on November 14th.

This wasn't about 32 years ago. It was about Kimberlin lying about not having been thrown back into the slammer in the later 1990's.

Wake the fock up, Judge Richard E. Jordan! You were kissing his arse at the end talking up how he's involved in good stuff now. The guy is involved in spreading outrageous conspiracy bunk which has brought in tons of money.

Triple F, did you ever consider I might have been telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Were you suffering from cognitive dissonance that day? You hate Boston Red Sox fans or wtf?

The Thrilling Conclusion of Thrilla in Vanilla

Socrates: Uh, yes I was, but uh I believe those three, those three have been shown to have a close association, and uh, I mean, unless, unless we get into specific, uh like what happened, uh I don't believe that the, the judge- I mean we're basically speaking to the judge. So unless the judge is blogging in his private time, I don't think he knows what we're talking about.

Kimberlin: Judge, I have no further questions.

Jordan: I know what you're talking about.

Socrates: Okay.

Jordan: Uhm, you can step down, Mr. [Socrates].

Socrates: Thanks.

Jordan: Do you have any other evidence, Mr. [Socrates}?

Socrates: Uh.

Jordan: I don't mean more statements, cause you've had your chance. Have a seat over there. Do you have any other documents? I've got your exhibit 1.

Socrates: I would only be able to have them after, and but I'm gonna say it. I'm not, uh, I mean, I could, I just want to emphsize that if I'm unable to add any more doc- send in any more documents, that I'm just saying for the public record, that uh to check into that Michael Connell story, check into what I blogged, and I stand by what I wrote. And if I, uh, I just stand by what I wrote. I didn't. It was a fascinating story, in my opinion. Like many people, I don't like people not owning up to what they did. Or if he wants to say he didn't do that, then tell us why, give us either, I don't know. It's fascinating. I don't know what to say. I don't if there's any more to cover on Mr. Kimberlin. So I mean, if you think he's a private individual. I mean, it's not, there's no end game, sir. I'm being sincere. There's no end game.

Jordan: Okay, so that's all your evidence?

Socrates: Uh

Jordan: Unless there's more, you know. We're closing down your part of the case.

Socrates: Uhm,

Jordan: Unless you've got something else.

Socrates: No, just more of my babblings.

Jordan: Okay.

Socrates: So I'm done.

Jordan: Alright. Uhm, I've heard the evidence, but if either of you wants to sum things up in two or three minutes, I'll hear you.

Kimberlin: Uhm, Judge, like I've said, I've been involved with this non-profit for ten years roughly and dealt with thousands of people, and no one has ever done what he's done to me. I mean, it's been constant. It's, it's been brutal. Uhm, you know, I have a thing called Google uh Google Alerts that alert me if my name does happen to come up on anything, anywhere in the whole country. Really, the only alerts I usually ever get are about him, uhm and, so you know for him to say he's just telling the truth, I mean, it's- If someone writes an article about me or my past, it's one article, and that's it. It's done, and people move on the next day. There's no moving on with this guy. It's like constant barrage every single week, every day. Whatever, you think he's gone, and then boom! It's like, you know whack a mole. He's back up again, you know, blogging. And then he, you know, he, he, he posted some stuff last year, and then he bragged about that he's now part of the zeitgeist!!! Because he's exposed Brett Kimberlin past, you know, from 32 years ago. And now, you know, all these right wing bloggers know about it and all this. And he's you know, he's got this huge head about him over this. And, and, and then you know he goes on, and he, you know, talked about this over and over for the last year about how he's the zeitgeist, because he exposed Brett Kimberlin. And Brett Kimberlin is involved with these non-profits, and, and everybody should stop, you know, giving money to these non-profits, because of Brett Kimberlin did something 32 years ago.

You know, and, and he talks about, you know, I haven't been exonerated. Well, he doesn't know what happened with the Justice Department lawsuit. He doesn't know. But he goes out and says, I know he's never been exonerated and all this stuff. Well, I'm not getting into that here. You know, but I can tell you for a fact and everybody here, I'm not on parole. I had a 50 year sentence. I'm no longer serving that sentence. So something happened, and that's as far as I'm going to go with that.

But, but at the same time, you know, for him to keep pouring this stuff out day after day after day, when I have to deal with kids, and I have to deal with Congress members, and I have to deal with community leaders, and I have to deal with non-profits, and all this. You know, every day, I get people Google searching me. Well how's this Brett Kimberlin doing? Oh you know they want to find out something good that I've done, you know helping the Green Part- the Green Movement in Iran or some, some kids that got hurt here in Bethesda or something like that, they don't find that out. They see his garbage, you know, 32 years ago murders and bombings and pedophilia and fraud and all this other stuff. I mean, it's constant, constant, constant.

He doesn't want to give me a leg up to get, to get. You know, there's no redemption. I have no redemption. It's like a ball and chain. This guy's my ball and chain. You know, it's like constant. And, and, and that's why I sued. You know, he was asked many times over and over under his assumed names stop this attack on Brett Kimberlin.

You know, he hasn't done anything to you. He's doing great stuff now. He's working, doing with children, and, and, you know has a family and stuff like that. Leave him alone. He would not stop. He wouldn't stop when the court asked him to stop. He wouldn't stop when the police asked him to stop. You know, and even after the judge found against him on default judgement and then ruled that he has to pull the blogs, he wouldn't pull the blogs. He had a court order. Pull those posts! He wouldn't do it. Google had to do it. Google had to step in and pull the posts.

And then even after that, he's telling people go to the Google cache and find these articles, that I've written about him. This is the truth. You need to know this about this guy. He is something terrible. He's a monster.

You know, this is what I've been dealing with every single day for years. And, you know, I finally had enough, you know, and I'm sorry that I had to bring it into the court and all that. You know, but I didn't know where it was coming from. I didn't know who he was. You know, and I have a right to live my life, to, to redeem myself, to be a, a outstanding member of society, which I am.

And, and I, I don't need this guy, you know, uh uh, throwing all this garbage at me constantly. You know, for whatever reason. You know, whether it's fascinating or the truth or I don't- You know, that's not the point. You know, it's harassment, and it's stalking, and it's defamation. And he, he, uh, you know, he throws in this stuff that a little bit about the truth from my past, and he, he makes it out to be something terrible. And, and, and you know, I, I, I think he should be held accountable, you know, for the full amount of damages. Thank you.

Jordan: Okay. Mr. [Socrates].

Socrates: Okay, uh, the main thing here is that Mr. Kimberlin has shown no causation. He, this whole lawsuit of his has been a total slander and smear job on me. This guy is a total public figure who has an extensive criminal, criminal past. He, he even uh denies what has been proven in law. He brings up some fictitious exoneration yet doesn't share it, even though that may be relevant to this case.

He's a public figure. Uhm

Jordan: Why, why don't you, uhm, why don't you just let him, leave him alone?

Socrates: Well, yeah so

Jordan: Why don't you just let him overcome his past?

Socrates: I'm not his [inaudible]

Jordan: He's involved in stuff right now that sounds very positive, why don't you

Socrates: No, he's, uh, the Michael Connell- I'm pretty much done. I mean, we're here in court. I'm done, but this guy you should look into it. Really look into it, and if you give this a fair shake, I believe you'll start to see that he's a public figure, and that I have not been stalking him.

He came out with a video. Can I sit, or am I supposed to stand?

Jordan: You're supposed to stand.

Socrates: I'm sorry about that.

Jordan: If there's a physical reason, you can.

Socrates: No, I'm fine.

Jordan: The question is why don't you leave him alone?

Socrates: I have left him alone. He sent me an email.

Jordan: When's the last time you blogged about him?

Socrates: Uh, I, I don't count those what he said I, I'm still blogging on him. I'm not- I haven't blogged on him like since, since that, that injunction. Maybe, you know, I slipped in like a mysterious like we'll see what happens, and maybe I can talk about it, but I can't really say anything type of thing. Or, or I admit like I put in a sentence or two, uhm you know, if you write site and then the colon and then uh and no space and then you put in the website, not the http but uh the website and then dot com or net, and then you put in your search phrases, then you can get to the Google cache.

I didn't mention by name. I did mention uh, I do admit to that. I mean, I wasn't trying to be malicious. And he was searching that out. But uhm, he, he came out, he's contending that he's a private individual. He put out a video. It was a remake of uhm, the Jonh Lennon song, War is, uh, his war song, and that got an incredible amount of youtube hits. It's just preposterous to think, to call him anything but a public figure.

I'm done. I'm not a stalker. I never stalked him. There's nothing. Nothing's been proven. There have been so many smear jobs on me, that uh, I don't know what you can believe from him. And I'm not, I'm not a stalker. And I, and I refuse to be turned into a prisoner or a convict, when I've done nothing wrong.

I blogged on a public figure, sir, and I'm sorry I'm getting emotional. But I mean, I didn't do anything wrong. He didn't show, he didn't show- the only thing he showed mentioned turned out he had to admit he doesn't have any proof of.

So what is up with this? He's, he's ah, he's just going with the default judgement. So, so fine. He won the default, because I was an idiot not to show up on time, because I had no money and no real way to get down here. I didn't, I didn't, I didn't ah. I messed up. I have no one to blame but myself for the default. But, I mean, I don't see the causation. I, I really don't. I, I didn't write any lies. He hasn't shown that I wrote anything, I mean, untruths that led to him losing money.

Maybe he has shown that he lost some money because of my blogging. But it wasn't just me. There were other people, and it was his, it was his responsi- He could have written on my blog. He could've said, like you know, that's not true. I mean, he's saying I called him a pedophile, when I didn't. And that to me appears to be slander, but I'm not a lawyer, and I'm not gonna go on for hours here. Uhm, it's literally out of my hands this whole thing. I don't see what else I can say. I'm done.

You don't have to worry about me. I don't want to go to prison. I've never been in jail before except for like a dui, but uhm, never convicted. I mean, I'm not a criminal. I'm not violent, and I'm not going to do anything to him. And I'm pretty much done blogging on him. Especially if you say you may never blog on him again. Whatever that means, I won't do it. Because, but I don't think I should pay him a cent. I don't see what the thing is here, where I should pay him money.

It's not my fault if truthful things written about him has caused him emotional distress. It's not, it's not my- I'm not saying he's Adolph Hitler, but uh pick someone who's done something similar to what he did, and it's not, it's not the public's responsibility to uh to give him a leg up and to forgive him, especially when he's still denying it.

And uh, I mean your court even puts these things in the public record. Like people can go to the web, the Maryland case research, I think that's what it's called. They can plug it in, and they can see it. So, and I mean, I showed you right here, there's all these documents from his past. You've got the Dan Quayle thing. I mean, I don't know what else I have to do to show he's a public figure. And with a public figure, there's a much, it's just different for the causation.

I, I asked him to show the court what I said that was either a lie or that hadn't been written before that was the truth that caused him to lose money. I'm done. He could've- I don't know. I'm sorry. I just- I'm sorry. I, I don't- I'm not really, I'm sorry that I'm uh, I'm sorry that I'm not a lawyer. I'm sorry I don't have a lawyer. That's it, sir. That is the bottom line here. I'm sorry that I couldn't afford a lawyer, and I'm sorry that I came down here without a lawyer, because, because in civil cases, poor people have no rights. I don't mean to offend you, but it's my opinion that poor people in civil cases have next to no rights, and, and freedom of speech is about who has the most money. And that, and uh, I just, uh, that's it. I think I've said it all. Alright, he hasn't proven one thing that I wrote. I mean, if my calling him the personification of scum uh caused him such mental distress, then uh, I mean, did he provide uh his counseling sessions, where the, the actual tort evidence on that? I mean, ah, ah, I mean I'm pretty sure a blogger calling some- a public figure the personification of scum is not gonna cause them to lose their money.

Uhm, what did I write to Lori Grace that wasn't true? And Lori Grace had her own website. She supplies her email. What do bloggers do? Why would they put their email up, if they're not saying email me? Did she tell me to stop emailing her? Did I email her more than once? No. What did I, what did I write to her that was false or that was wrong to do?

And if you look at her website, if you, if you investigate it, you'll see that she was writing about her involvement with Brett Kimberlin and uh Cliff Arnebeck and Stephen Spoonamore. That's the guy. There was another individual I had forgot about. And then if you look into, uhm, the Michael Connell threatened by Karl Rove hoax, if you look into what I actually wrote, there's no lies in that. I mean, I can uncover it for you. I'm jeopardising myself with perjury, if I'm gonna make things up.

I'm not the one calling, saying someone said something about. I mean, I'm Jewish, and I'm not gonna. I'm not gonna. I'm done. I'm done.

Jordan: It's unfortunate that this matter didn't go to trial, because it does complicate the damage issue. Uhm, but.

Mr Kimberlin, the Plaintiff has the burden of proof uh to show actual damages. There is a concept called defamation per se, but Maryland law still requires a showing of actual damages. And uh, I've got to find actual damages by a preponderance of the evidence in order to award damages.

Uhm, there are varied ways before the court in all honesty or generalised statements. I don't see specific quotes. Uhm, there are words that you reference, uh, not in context, and I don't have the actual statement so and so did this or that on a certain date and is therefore guilty of some offense, and that that is an untrue statement.

Uh so, the concern I have is that the statements that I've got before me are very generalised as supposed to specific uh statements directed to your person. Uh, the major uh concern I have and the difficulty I have in awarding actual damages is that the causal connection between whatever statements were made that were defamatory and the financial impact on you is uh not proven by a preponderance of the evidence.

You can say well this grant money has dropped down uhm you know in U.S. uh United States grant that might have gone through, that was looking good, but then it fell though. Uhm, that is some circumstantial evidence. But I don't find it to be sufficient evidence to prove actual damages. Uhm, and this is uhm, I also can't t- uh, I also can't uhhh be blind to uh 1st Amendment issues, and whether statements that were contained in blogs were statements of uh truth and uh, whether the uh, they did have an impact on your reputation.

Uhm, I am going to order a permanent injunction that Mr. [Socrates] will not defame Mr. Kimberlin or interfere with his business. Uh, I, I cannot under the 1st Amendment order that there be nothing said about Mr. Kimberlin ever again. But I will say to you, Mr. [Socrates], it's, it might be the legal ruling but morally get off this guy's back. Let him get on with his life. Let him get on with his business.

He's doing productive, positive things. You might not agree with what he's doing, but he's contributing to society in a positive way. Let him get away from his past. 32 years is a long time, and, and even though you say you're you know propounding the truth, uhm, what for? I mean you made, you've made some points. They're out there. That information was past. It's, Mr. Kimberlin should be allowed to get on with his life.

I'm gonna uh, because there was a uh a default uh on the claims themselves uh, I'll award what is considered really nominal damages of a hundred dollars. But a final injunction that you are ordered not to defame, not to interfere with his business. And if you write about him, then you write at your peril of whether what you're writing falls under those categories. And you can be in front of the court on contempt of court and can obviously be subject to a future lawsuit.

This is something that's caused you I would assume some angst. And, you know, in different circumstances, maybe even a different judge, you end up with, you know, a huge dollar judgement against you.

Kimberlin: One question. Can I get costs?

Jordan: Uhm, court costs? That's what you're asking for?

Kimberlin: Yeah, just uh the cost of the filing and subpoeanas and all that. I think it was about 800 bucks.

Jordan: Uhm, I will award court costs. Now, what the clerk considers to be court costs, I don't know if it is that amount or not, you know?

Kimberlin: Okay.

Jordan: Because that's sort of a term of [inaudible]

Kimberlin: So ah how is that determined?

Jordan: I'll have a written order that'll issue, that'll award costs. Uhm, th- that the uh defendant is to pay costs.

Kimberlin: Okay.

Jordan: Court costs, okay.

Kumberlin: Judge, I want to thank you for your time. I really appreciate it.

Jordan: Well, I mean, I'm sure you're not exactly thrilled with the outcome, but

Kimberlin: Well yeah

Jordan: Defa-, defamation, interference with business, they're very difficult matters to prove and to tie together. Uhm,

Kimberlin: I mean the, the injunction I think is good, and the default judgement is good. I'm happy with that.

Jordan: Alright. Well, I'm

Socrates: Thanks, thanks for letting me ah continue to blog, as long as I don't defame.

Jordan: And I would just say just use

Socrates: I never did.

Jordan: Be, be human about it. Mr. Kimberlin shouldn't have to

Socrates: Was he, was he human about me?

Jordan: I don't want, I don't want you talking to me.

Socrates: Okay.

Jordan: Let him go on with his life. Don't, he doesn't need to have his kids and his wife reading stuff about him on the internet. I'm just saying from a moral standpoint, give him a break. Okay. Thank you very much.

Kimberlin: Thank you. Thank you.

Jordan: Have a good day. Mr. Kimberlin, why don't you [inaudible]. I'll give you about a five minute head start. I don't want you guys bumping into each other in the elevator given the fact that there's a protective order.

Kimberlin: Thank you so much. I appreciate it.

Jordan: Okay, thank you. Mr. [Socrates], if you wouldn't mind just having a seat in the court room until uh 25 of 1. Five minutes.

Socrates: As long as I can go and don't get arrested, I'll be happy.

Jordan: You're not, you're not gonna get arrested.

Socrates: They didn't, they ah

Jordan: You can call the next case.

Socrates: I was

Jordan: I uh, I've gotta deal with another matter.

Socrates: Aaaah [inaudible]

Jordan: Deputy [inaudible], I am very much grateful for your being here. I know it was maybe not the most uh exciting use of your time, but uh

Socrates: Ah, come on, this was gold. Now I'm off to (end of audio). The last word was probably blog, lol, which would have been a euphemism for weed hunt.

Thrilla in Vanilla (part 7)

2012-01-18T20:38:00.000-05:00

"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am."

"If you dream of beating me, you'd better wake up and apologise."

"I got nothing against no Viet Cong. No Vietnamese ever called me a 'nigger'."

"Why should they ask me to put on a uniform and go 10,000 miles from home and drop bombs and bullets on brown people while so-called Negro people in Louisville are treated like dogs?"

"Boxing is a lot of white men watching two black men beat each other up."

"I done wrestled with an alligator, I done tussled with a whale, only last week I murdered a rock, injured a stone, hospitalized a brick. I'm so mean I make medicine sick."

"There's not a man alive who can whup me. I'm too fast. I'm too smart. I'm too pretty. I should be a postage stamp. That's the only way I'll ever get licked."

‘I’m so mean I make medicine sick’ – Muhammad Ali’s greatest quotes

Notes
*** Mandy Nagy didn't share the email with the court. One day a local donut eater showed up, and we hashed out what happened. He seemed satisfied with my schtick, that it had been a piss poor attempt at humor. He told me he'd have to notify the "Speedway Bomber" and etc. and so forth. He said I might be arraigned in the Taunton Court, but he was unsure of that. I never did get into any trouble with the Massachusetts court, because there was never a death threat. Unlike the police state which exists in Maryland, Massachusetts is a fairly progressive state and not sooo easily duped, unless of course some Whitey blames a Black man for killing his wife.

*** Haha, I am rewinding the bit where Judge Jordan is asking me to do him a favour, and it sounds like he put on the Boston accent schtick, as in "Do me a favah." Boston accents rule!!!!!

*** Earlier Jordan had condescendingly asked me if I watched tv, in an attempt to get me to focus in on court protocol. But what I saw was that Kimberlin didn't seem to be under any obligation to simply answer my questions and could go off on tangents or whatnot having nothing to do with original questions. So, that's why when it was my turn to be cross-examined, I figured that was how the game was gonna be played. It's like with baseball and strike zones. Every umpire has a different strike zone schtick. Thus, I played it the way Jordan had established his. And when a trial is umpired that way, it becomes rather difficult to remember original questions.

*** This was a garbage lawsuit, PERIOD!!!! No police ever asked me to stop blogging. I'd have to search through all the rubbish to see what the original preliminary injunction ordered. It may not have even told me I couldn't blog on this case or anything. I don't remember. It did get 21 DFQ2 blog entries deleted. I know that. There's something called Freedom of Speech in this country. Brett Kimberlin is a notorious public figure. His Velvet Revolution has been running outrageous bunk for years and then asking for donations based on such utter nonsense. The truth is on my side.

Kimberlin Cross-Examination

Jordan: Okay. Have a seat. Is that all you want to say on direct examina-, direct testimony?

Socrates: Uhm.

Jordan: You don't need to repeat yourself. I'm gonna think uh, I think I got your points. I'm about to turn you over to Mr. Kimberlin for any questions that he's got.

Socrates: Just uhm, I ah respond, I think. I'm fairly sure I responded to each one. I don't know if it ah- I'm not sure if there's anything I missed to respond to.

Jordan: Okay.

Socrates: So I guess I'm done.

Jordan: Alright. Mr. Kimberlin, do you have any questions?

Kimberlin: Yes, sir. How many blog posts have you made about me on any forum or blog over the last five years?

Socrates: A lot.

Kimberlin: How many?

Socrates: Five years? I don't have the exact number.

Kimberlin: How many do you think approximate?

Socrates: Do you mean like entries?

Kimberlin: Entries, blogs, comments, posts, whatever.

Socrates: I don't know. A lot.

Kimberlin: How many, how many blogs have you posted about me on?

Socrates: I don't have the exact number, maybe, I don't know. I'm not trying to hedge. I've posted a lot on you. I found it fascinating.

Kimberlin: Have you talked to other bloggers, uh, by phone or by email asking them to also post about me, your, your, to follow up your posts about me?

Socrates: Hmmm. No.

Kimberlin: Have you talked of uh, uh

Socrates: I, I was, uh, I emailed, uhm, it was when Mandy Nagy came out. She's the one who, ah, who, who uh shared that, that uh unfortunate email with the court. Uhm, I'm friends with- I'm friendly with her, and uh, I haven't spoken to uh Assistant District Attorney Patrick Frey in a while. But we used to email, and uh, discuss the story. Uhm, I told him I, I liked Mr. Singer's book, and uh, I think uh, Patrick Frey picked up a copy. Uhm

Kimberlin: Did you talk to

Socrates: I gave Patrick Frey some links, that I thought he'd be interested in. Like uh, I uncovered uhm an interesting court document from the, uh, the- I'm not sure what it was. But ah, you had like uhm, you put uh, some type of, you made some type of affidavit. Or it was, I just found it fascinating the Connell story, uh, concerning these alle- these I don't know if they were allegations, or if they were uh theories uhm about whether Karl Rove uh might have killed Michael Connell, because of uh, the uh- Cause Michael Connell was going to uh maybe uh. Your associate Larisa Alexandrovna, who said that you said you were exonerated and won a huge settlement for the bombing, uh- That's kind of one of the reasons why I wrote a lot about you, because I didn't understand why you just didn't own up to setting the bombs. I mean, setting the bombs and the guy died

Kimberlin: Objection. Objection, Your Honour.

Jordan: Yes, it's beyon- It's beyond the scope of the question. Sustained. Why don't you go on to the next question.

Socrates: What was the ques- Yeah, yeah uh

Jordan: The question was just [inaudible], and you went on and on. Just

Socrates: Sir

Jordan: do me a favour.

Socrates: Yeah, I'm sorry.

Jordan: Try to listen to the question and try to just answer the question.

Socrates: There might have been one other uh, but I don't get along with him. He was on the list. We might have uh, we might have had a few private messages about it. There was uhm. When you, I think, I believe I saw

Jordan: The question was the number of blogs, and you said basically

Socrates: Alright, I thought we were on to uh my interactions with bloggers encouraging them or to blog on him. Uh, there might have been one time, uh, one of the names on that list that wasn't me. He was a moderator at another blog I had. Uhm, he, he posted. Uh, I think Mr. Kimberlin did a photo- He was somehow shaking hands with Karl Rove, is that correct? I mean alright, it's not cross-testimony. I'm done. I have nothing to hide. Uhm.

Jordan: Next question please.

Kimberlin: So, have you ever called uh me the personification of scum on a blog post?

Socrates: Well, of course. I mentioned it earlier today.

Kimberlin: Have, have you ever unm stated on a blog post that you think I should go to jail for defrauding people?

Socrates: Uhm, I wrote that I thought you should be investigated for fraud. Uhm, and I did write that if you had, well I'm not sure. I know I wrote, I wrote in the private emails that weren't, I wasn't expecting would be for public consumption, that if you, if you had committed perjury, in, in somehow in this trial, that you, that your parole should be revoked. But you say you're not on parole, so I, I, you know, I, I apologise for thinking you're still on parole.

Kimberlin: Have you ever stated that you wanted to, uh, that you hoped or wanted my non-profits to be dead or be killed or some such word?

Socrates: Nah, I'd have to see, I'd have to see like what you're talking about in its context.

Kimberlin: Have you ever uh indicated that you, that you wanted to, to stop the funding uh sources from into to the non-profits I'm involved with?

Socrates: Are you, if you provide something from the blog, then I can say whether I think I wrote it.

Kimberlin: [inaudible]

Socrates: I don't

Kimberlin: It's a simple question. Have you ever asked people not, not to fund us?

Socrates: Well you read, I did write the letter, the email to Lori Grace.

Kimberlin: Yeah, but I'm talking about

Socrates: So

Kimberlin: a blog post, did you ask people not to send in money to us, not to

Socrates: I don't think anyone should send you uh five, ten bucks, and I, I don't think anyone should send you any money, to be honest.

Kimberlin: Have you ever said though on a blog post?

Socrates: Uhm, as a blogger, I, I, I can't remember specifics. I wasn't, it wasn't you personally. The only thing that would have been personal about it, would be because I felt ah it was wrong, it was wrong for someone to not just own up to their crimes. I mean, that's the only thing where I might have uh had a bit of uh animosity toward you. And I, I really didn't think that Michael Conn- the Mich- Like the domestic terrorism campaign. You have uh, you're looking for donations uh for uh against domestic terrorism, which is a worthy cause. But here you are convicted of a horrendous bombings in Speedway, and while you're known as the Speedway Bomber. Uhm, and like unless you can show this- You're saying you were exonerated, but it's closed. I mean, I'm sorry, that wasn't good enough for me. It seemed like you were spreading some type of lie, that you were some political prisoner, when you're just making, when, when you're just spinning things. Such as that Je-, that I'm a Jew

Kimberlin: So you don't know what

Socrates: That Jews are the scourge. It's like what you- It's like that Wizard of Odd article as an exhibit. The guy writes like you do put in some good stuff, but then it's mixed in with a lot of other stuff that's unsubstantiated. Th th, and then you miss, you, you omit things. Like you admitted to tell this court that you were- From what I hear, I didn't see the file, but I, from what I, from what I'm uh, I'm under the impression that you made it appear to this court that you are a private individual who had maybe dealed some marijuana. But as I, as I provided in the first page of the of uh my defense against uhm damages and and with the uh the exhibits that uh, there's a long list of things. Like uh, impersonating a Department of Defense insignia. What, you're saying that the uh, the people who caught you doing that were lying?

Jordan: I think we've gone beyond the question.

Socrates: Sorry.

Jordan: Next question.

Kimberlin: Uhm. So for thr-, for two or three years you have posted scores if not hundreds of posts about me or comments or something on, on various blogs using various names including socrates and Prepostericty and so on. Is that true?

Socrates: No, not 'so on' the way you're putting it.

Kimberlin: Okay. Okay.

Socrates: I need him to be specific.

Kimberlin: Okay. Prepostericity and socrates.

Socrates: Sorry for that.

Kimberlin: Right?

Socrates: Yes, those are my two usernames, and if anyone

Kimberlin: Have you been banned from blogs for, for posting false or defamatory or inappropriate or uh otherwise

Socrates: Not for those. Not for those.

Kimberlin: for not following

Jordan: Let him finish the question.

Kimberlin: Have you been banned from any blogs?

Socrates: Yes.

Kimberlin: How many?

Socrates: Uh, I don't know.

Kimberlin: Have you been accused of harassing other people?

Jordan: It's not really relevant.

Kimberlin: No, it's not. Have you, uhm, what is your end game in coming, in, in, in targeting me?

Socrates: Mark Singer wrote

Kimberlin: What was your end game? What, what did, what did you want to accomplish?

Socrates: It's, it's the uh- What's, I, I forget the rest of the title from Mark Singer's book, the incredible- There's just something so fascinating about it. I remember you from when you were on the tv, and you were saying you sold pot to Dan Quayle. And then, then all of a sudden, I was, was blogging for Brad Friedman. Uhm, and I'm going off on a tangent. Uh, the end game, there's no end game. It's obviously- You want to know what the end game is, uh, that's probably irrelevant to uh You- the judge.

Kimberlin: No, I, uh, I, I mean, I know what the end game is, but, but I want you to admit what the end game is.

Socrates: Here again, uhm, I find that the uh the Plaintiff- He did this at the beginning of this of our, of our 9:30 the session or when we started, and he's been doing it throughout. He's been, uhm, making comments

Jordan: I don't need your commentary. I just need you to answer his question, and it does go to the issue of whether it was done maliciously.

Socrates: The, the uhmm

Kimberlin: Have you done this out of malice?

Socrates: No, it's I find your story fascinating. Utterly fascinating. I did then, uhm, it's still fascinating.

Kimberlin: Have, have you, have you used blogs to try to call me out? To say something like, come on Brett, answer me, after making some scurrilous allegation?

Socrates: I didn't make scurrilous allegations

Kimberlin: Okay.

Socrates: at you.

Kimberlin: Okay, after an allegation of criminal conduct or fraud or misconduct or anything like that?

Socrates: Can you repeat that please?

Kimberlin: Have I ever responded to you on a blog in any of, ever on any of your posts?

Socrates: Uhm, I think you sent uh copies of uh court papers, and that was it.

Kimberlin: Okay.

Socrates: You never actually, you never responded to any of the content.

Kimberlin: Right.

Socrates: We've never interacted on a blog, I don't believe..

Kimberlin: Exactly. Every time that you blogged about Velvet Revolution or Justice Through Music or BradBlog, has it always included some comment about criminal activity by me?

Socrates: No.

Kimberlin: Or, or

Socrates: No.

Kimberlin: Have, have most of them been? Have you tainted almost every post you've made about Velvet Revolution or BradBlog with some reference to me or my past?

Socrates: No. I, I've an extensive blogging history. You're just- My, my uhm, my blogging on Brett Kimberlin was uh, it, it it's not, it's just a small part of what, of what I blogged on. It just happened to be uh one of the, the, the ones uhm

Kimberlin: Did you ever consider the possiblity that this could harm my reputation or the reputation of my family?

Socrates: I don't think, I don't think your reputation could be harmed any worse than it is. I mean, it's on the public record.

Kimberlin: How about my kids?

Socrates: I don't even know if you have kids.

Kimberlin: Well I do. I have two. And how about my

Socrates: Congratulations.

Kimberlin: How about my wife?

Socrates: I don't know your wife, and I don't need to know your family.

Kimberlin: No, well

Socrates: And I've never written about your family.

Kimberlin: Have you ever considered the fact that you saying these things, that it could harm uh their reputation as well, because they're, they're my family?

Socrates: I just wrote the truth. I, I see nothing wrong about writing the truth about a public figure.

Kimberlin: Writing the truth over and over, and when you get banned for, for, for that

Socrates: That's irrel- We already decided that was irrelevant, because we'd have to go through a trial of, uh, what happened on that website.

Kimberlin: I realise that, but I'm saying people asked you to stop writing

Socrates: People like Larisa Alexandrovna, your associate.

Kimberlin: Asked you to stop. The court asked you to stop. The police asked you to stop.

Socrates: No.

Kimberlin: You never stopped.

Socrates: No, wait no. I, I say no. I don't agree on all that. It's too quick. I need, I need to hear one

Kimberlin: Did anyone ever

Socrates: thing

Kimberlin: ask you to stop blogging about me?

Socrates: Uh, well, do you mean like uhm the court orders?

Kimberlin: Anyone?

Socrates: Uh, yeah, this court wanted me I believe the prelimine- blah, the preliminary injunction, ah, was for me to cease all blogging on Brett Kimberlin, so I stopped. I mean, I'm sorry if I somehow crossed the line by saying uh, by giving one of those, uh, those search tips about how to search somthing in ah Google cache. Uhm, but ah Larisa Alexandrovna, she told me to stop, uh. She called me a stalker on Daily Kos, uh, by Markos Moulitsas' blog. She called me a stalker for my articles, those couple articles I wrote on Daily Kos.

Kimberlin: Were you, were you banned by Daily Kos?

Socrates: Uh, a lot of peop- I was.

Kimberlin: Were you banned from Democratic Underground?

Socrates: Yes, but uh

Kimberlin: Were you banned from BradBlog?

Socrates: Uh, yes I was, but uh I believe those three, those three have been shown to have a close association, and uh, I mean, unless, unless we get into specific, uh like what happened, uh I don't believe that the, the judge- I mean we're basically speaking to the judge. So unless the judge is

(Coming Soon: The thrilling conclusion to Thrilla in Vanilla, not a Quinn Martin Production)

Thrilla in Vanilla (Part 6)

2012-01-17T18:33:00.000-05:00

Triple F

socrates

notes
*** The hearing that followed a few days later was not criminal. It was in a family court and pertained to another Brett Kimberlin attempt to get me into trouble. I didn't even have to be there. He has refused to back the "f" off. And now hopefully justice will finally be served, and he will be charged with criminal perjury.
*** There was never a murder threat. The prosecutor filed nolle prosequi on Sept. 15th. I didn't even have to face a judge. Yet, as with soooo much to do with this case, Judge Jordan was obviously not paying attention. That will be made clear by the end, when ye will see him praising Mr. Kimberlin for all the good he is currently doing. Jordan shouldn't have taken Kimberlin at his word to the extent he did while simultaneously treating me like a potential criminal. Hence, imho, Judge Jordan is a hack. Imho, that should be obvious to anyone paying attention.
*** I was very nice to Judge Jordan. I had to be. But now since we are back on equal footing, the truth has to be told about him. An eye needs to be kept on his judiciating, before he potentially mismanages a lot of other trials, akin to how he did this one.
*** I was really spent at this point and awaiting my second wind. I misspoke and referred to this trial as criminal, when indeed it was a civil trial. It was quite ironic to see a law abiding citizen as myself with no felonies getting completely railroaded by one of the most notorious criminals to emerge from Indiana in the second half of the 20th Century. That is whose butt Jordan was kissing. It certainly wasn't mine.
*** Retraction: Earlier I have referred to Judge Jordan as a rookie judge. According to this link, he started as a judge on March 13, 2009 and was re-elected for a fifteen year term on November 2, 2010.
*** Kimberlin never left comments on my blog. What he did was leave the writ of summons and other court motions and whatnot he was up to on DFQ2, as if that was legally serving me. Uhm, no.

Thrilla in Vanilla part 6

Socrates: But my point is that in the blogging world, as bloggers, it's not stalking to interact with what people write. Cyberstalking is to follow people around the internet and cause them distress.

And I never did that. I never followed Mr. Kimberlin around the internet. I haven't posted on him uhm. So I contend Lori Grace opened herself up to be emailed, because she left her email address. And uh, there's a lot of, the, the Michael Connell case, uh, I wanted her to know that they were, that there's a theory being circulated. Uh, Mr. Kimberlin was involved and Cliff Arnebeck and it's in the Ohio courts, and this can all be verified, unlike other things that have been tried to be put into this court room, where it's been alleged that Karl Rove threatened Michael Connell, because he was, he was about to spill the beans on, on the 2004 election being stolen. And I noticed that. I'm what's considered a trollbuster, an amateur internet cybersleuth. We're not malicious. We don't, we don't go after people like this Kid Kemona's been going after me or "Louis Aubuchont" has been going after me. And I reported that to the [redacted] Police Department, that I've been getting cyberstalked.

Uhm, I recently emailed, I probably broke that peace order, because I had to write Mr. Kimberlin a second time to stop contacting me.

Jordan: I don't think you want to go there right now.

Socrates: Okay, yes sir.

Jordan: You're not an attorney. So you'd be subjected to criminal prosecution.

Socrates: I definitely do not want to be arrested. And uh, I'm not from Maryland. I don't even know where he uh, I don't care where he li-, I don't want to hurt him. I don't- I pose no threat, for the public record. Uhm. In my defense for that alleged murder threat, it was a bad piece

Jordan: I don't know if you want to go there. Mr. Kimberlin's already testified that the murder threat alleged is not part of this case, and it's my

Socrates: Okay.

Jordan: My recollection is that you may have criminal charges pending based on that.

Socrates: There's something scheduled for in a few days.

Jordan: Do you have an attorney for that case?

Socrates: Uhm, I'm not really sure what's on with that. I

Jordan: It's not part of this case, because it's not part of Mr. Kimberlin's claim. And it doesn't

Socrates: I appreciate you

Jordan: make sense for you to go there and make statements about something that might be pending on a criminal matter involving you.

Socrates: I appreciate that, sir. Uhm. So, I'm just, to wrap up, it's not stalking to uh, I've- Us bloggers get accused of stalking when, because we keep responding to individuals. And uh, I, I did not, I mean I was writing on my private blog which, which has public comments. Uhm, Mr. Kimberlin and no one else ever wrote anything. I mean, it was right there. He never left a comment. I would have, I would have okayed it. I would have debated with it. Uhm, you know like, he had every opportunity to interact with me on my blog. But what he did was instead, I believe, he left comments about this criminal case on my blog, which I wasn't sure was true or not until, uh, until recently.

Uh, I knew it was real, but I didn't realise the uh, how important it was. And I thought I was just going to lose, maybe get my entries deleted, and my real name found out. I didn't know there, I didn't know someeone could actually you know be awarded

Jordan: Six million dollars?
Socrates: Huh? 2.8, what is it, $2.8 million he wants?
Jordan: There are claims for actual and punitive damages both exceeding a million.
Socrates: Yes uhm, my contention is that he, it's not really the money he's after. He's trying to uh, he, I mean, I came up with, I came up with damaging uh cybersleuthing of open source materials. Like in response to him saying that one of my recent comments that one of my ideas was uh, and if I'm not allowed to, I won't do it. But I was thinking what if I just posted open source information with the links without any commentary by myself?

If I'm not allowed to do that, then I mean, you can say that, and I'm like I will be in contempt of Your Honour. But that's all I wrote about one of the things, that he's mentioning. I, I was curious, like, what if I just wrote, you know within copyright laws? You know, I'm not going to copy Mr. Singer's whole book. Uhm, like just to keep my commentary out of it. And that's basically what it is. I apologise for uh a few nasty comments I made. The personification of scum. I've admitted I shouldn't have written that.

Uhm, but I contend nothing I wrote was ah false, and thus there's no causation of damages. There's no ah. If he's having, if he's having emotional damages, psychological damages, because of what he contends, I don't understand that either. Because I haven't written anything that was false. He had every opportunity to respond to my blog. He could have written like, well, are you finished? Why don't you stop? I'm trying to get on with my life. If he had done that, I might have stopped. But instead I got sued.

Uhm, nothing I wrote was false. Nothing I wrote was false. If, and, and, I mean, private individuals do not, this is only an inkling of how public a figure he is. And uh, so that's basically it. I put in my argument. Much better than me going on and on, it's in here and links up with the exhibits and that's, I guess that's my two contentions. That uh, he's a public figure, and that there's no causation. And the only other thing I can think of is that uh I shouldn't have to pay his court costs. If anything, I would like him to pay. If there are no damages, I would like him to pay me for the gas mileage, and the wear and tear on the car

Jordan: Well that's, that's not before me. Okay, so that's your summary?

Socrates: I, I, I would like to see where the damages are. I, I didn't hear any, I didn't see any causation.

Jordan: Okay.

Socrates: If there were damages based on true facts, I don't know how, that just doesn't seem to make sense to me

Jordan: Okay, okay.

Socrates: how someone can be liable for posting true things, and that's it.

Jordan: Okay. You made that point.

Socrates: I'm done.

Jordan: I admit uh in evidence Defendant's exhibit #1 and as well as the Plaintiff's exhibits, including the Plaintiff's statement on damages which is exhibit two for the Plaintiff. And I need to take another quick break. If you folks need to use the restroom or something, fine, but please be back here in a few minutes. And uh, no interaction between the two of you.

Socrates: I would like- Thank you.
Court Babe: All rise. Court stands in recess.

(to be continued)

Thrilla In Vanilla (Part 5)

2012-01-17T15:00:00.000-05:00

And Mr. [Socrates] took it upon himself to decide that we were fraudsters and criminals and pedophiles and murderers. And my partner is Jewish, and he made a post that Jews are the scourge of the Earth. And that Jews should die in the ovens. And he has called me a pedophile a murderer, a fraudster, a con man, a terrorist. I mean the list goes on.

Below in today's excerpt, you will see how I told Judge Jordan man to man I didn't appreciate that kind of rubbish directed at me.

From the earliest of age, we were taught about what happened to our people. Brett Kimberlin picked the wrong time and subject to fock with me. That utter bullshite probably woke me up more than the coffee I drank before the hearing.

There's something called right woos left, and I've done all I can as a blogger to expose it.

On the otherhand, Brett Kimberlin has an affiliate called The Lonestar Iconoclast, and this was what they once had on its cover.

If you look at the bottom bit, you can see they had published an article by an anti-semitic, conspiracy kook named Eric May.

Brad Friedman of BradBlog up until recently has had only one moderator. Her handle is Agent 99. She and her blogging buddies have been supporting anti-semitic sources for years. Myself and The Last Name Left have teamed up a lot confronting her and other anti-semitic pigs the last several years. I encourage folks to visit his blog.

I won't list everything I've done which shows clearly Brett Kimberlin couldn't have been more out of touch with reality with what he alleged I had posted. Here is some of it.

National Wingnut Appreciation Day

Brad Friedman's Moderator Tied to Anti-Semitism and Holocaust Denial

Michael Rivero Exposed As A Right Woos Left Jew Hater

Internet Fakes Creating Outrage At Jewish People

More on Rivero and Jew Hating

I could put up more links proving I have been adamantly opposed to internet Joooo hating, but the above should suffice. When I think of that Kimberlin allegation made in court, I can only think of one more thing.

Johnny Cash-Folson Prison Blues

Thrilla in Vanilla Part 5

I was fairly wiped out by the time I hit the witness stand. My opening schtick was disjointed. By the end I was able to catch a second wind and pick back up my game, especially when it was Kimberlin's turn to cross-examine. In hindsight, this thingie had been decided by the end of my cross-examination of Brett Kimberlin. Thinking baseball, at that point it was 22-3 in the last of the fifth inning. Kimberlin was thoroughly bested by a tired, sleepy, good kid from Massachusetts who had been driving all through the night to face down this nonsense.

BK: And, I mean, in that email, he says... it sounds like perjury, and I want his parole officers to find out that he has perjured himself. And uhm, that means Kimberlin should go back to jail. That's what he says, and that's what these kind of posts that he made all the time.

Socrates: Was there an if, or did I say was there a condition?

Kimberlin: That Kimberlin should be in jail. That's what he always wanted, you know, they should be charged with fraud. There should be investigations. He's asked people to investigate.

Judge: Next question, if you've got anymore.

Socrates: Uhm. Well. Do you think it's wrong for people to post about others who have committed crimes in the past?

Kimberlin: Objection.

Judge: Sustained.

Socrates: Hmm, okay. Uhm. I guess I'm done. I asked for evidence, and I'm not getting anything to work with here.

Judge: Alright, you can step down Mr. Kimberlin. Do you want to testify, Mr. [Socrates]?

Socrates: Yes, please.

Judge: OK, come on up here, and we'll swear you in.

Socrates: Do I, do I have to leave my documents?

Judge: You can bring them up if you want.

Socrates: I don't know if they'll do me any good, but.

(swearing in stuff)

Judge: Okay, state your name for the record, please.

Socrates: My name is [Socrates].

Judge: OK. Okay, Mr. [Socrates], what do you have to say?

Socrates: I'm not sure what I'm allowed to say, and if you want to set me some guidelines, I'll try to abide.

Judge: Keep in mind that the determination is whether certain statements by you led to damages to Mr. Kimberlin.

Socrates: I'll say this. Uhm, I apologize for delivering this brief today. I tried to get it in before today. It's only, it's about 6 pages. And, ah, it pretty much wraps up, it makes in a concise way, uhm, my argument that I did not cause, cause any, uh, financial or, uhm, any financial things. Uhm, I contend

Judge: Are you talking about this packet?

Socrates: Yes.

Judge: Mark this as Defendent's exhibit 1.

Socrates: I contend that reposting things that have been written by, uh, mainstream journalists, things that are in public, uh, court doc- records about Mr. Kimberlins' past, that, that does not constitute stalking or harassment. I was under the impression that stalking, well cyber, I was under, forget about stalking, that's, that's physical, going to someone's house, I was under the impression. Cyberstalking I am very aware of. I have been getting cyberstalked, and it has really picked up the last half a year. And I mention this, because what Mr. Kimberlin has supplied to the court has almost to a T, mirrored actual cybersmearing and slander against me.

Judge: That's not why we're here.

Socrates: OK, yes sir. I, uhm, I apologise. Uhm, alright, I'll just, ah, I'll just take a few, uh, a few minutes if I'm allowed. Uhm. I contend that no evidence has been supplied to the court that I wrote anything that was false. I have heard things alleged about me that I wrote, that I never wrote. For the record, I am 100% Jewish. So when I hear something about the scourge, Jews being the scourge of the earth, I, I want to know where he's coming up with that, and why I have to sit through and hear that. I know it doesn't have to do with the case, but that's how I'm feeling. Uhm, things that, I want to get to the causation. I want to know. I, I, I swear under penalties of perjury that I never called him a pedophile. I took very good care to phrase things as to the best of my ability. There was information written about, uh, Mr. Kimberlin possibly having, uh, an um awkward relationship with Julia Scyphers' granddaughter. I did not make that up. I'm just trying to defend myself for the specifics that he's claiming that I lied about him or asked him about. A perjurer? I, he, he, if he's been convicted of perjury, then how is it harrassing on my part to post that he's a perjurer? If he was, uhm, actually a murder suspect. I seem to recall him denying that. Maybe he didn't deny it. If I make a mistake, I apologise. If I, I'm not, I understand perjury is not a good thing. Um, and if I do mess up, I apologise, and I'll whatev-, um

Judge: What was the basis for you to say that he was a perjurer? Well first of all, did you say that? Did you state that?

Socrates: I read, read in Mark. Yes, I've read in that, uhm, he was convicted of perjury. I believe he was. I read about it in uhm Mark Singer, Mark Singer's book, uh, Citizen K.

Judge: What does that have to do with this case?

Socrates: Um, well, that's another way that um, that's another exhibit that shows that, um, Brett Kimberlin has indeed been a public figure. He went into a book deal with Mark Singer of the uhm, The New Yorker. Based on, uhm, I believe the impetus was, ah, Mr. Kimberlin's claims that he had sold marijuana to Dan Quayle which was never substantiated. From what I read from Mr. Singer's book, uh, he poured over documents, uhm. Apparently there was a list of, there was like, what is it? The Federal Drug and, Drug, one of those federal groups, like a drug agency. Uh, I believe they had a list of, uh, suspected high-profile individuals who may be involved in drugs. And I believe, that, uhm, Mr. Kimberlin somehow got access to that list, and, and since he grew up in Indiana, that he used that. So if he's claiming that I've been smearing him with, with uh blog posts about a public situation which was blasted, which was all over the news. I, I remembered it back then. I was kind of uh too young to really follow it, but I
remember there was someone uh in a prison claiming he had sold marijuana to Dan Quayle. And if he, if he was doing, I don't know if he was doing that, if he was doing that to ah, influence the uh the race, the election, then that's, uh, being a public figure. I'm not, I'm unsure about public figures in regards to high-profile criminals. Uhm, but I, I, I do see his name. His name is all over the internet beyond what I've written. I, I

Judge: Did you read the book Citizen K?

Socrates: Yes.

Judge: Does the K refer to Kimberlin?

Socrates: Yes. It was by Mark Singer of The New Yorker. There's uhm, there's a small blurb in one of the sheets I put in, that was put in.

Judge: Okay, is that your Exihibit 1, that we're talking about?

Socrates: Ah, yeah like somewhere in some of these yellow. I, I corresponded the ah the letter, so th the first one would be A. Uhm

Judge: Is that something you're offering as evidence?

Socrates: Yes, I'm offering all this as evidence for you to consider that, uhm, there th that he's a public figure, and that he has not proven that I wrote anything that was false or that hadn't been written before by other people. And in that, because he has, he is involved in these high-public cases, and he is. I mean he's listed in the ah, just recently he's got this campaign to uhm, against the- He's got, he's got this campaign against Andrew Breitbart of uh. He's the gentleman who helped Ariana Huffington start the Huffington Post. And uh, I mean I know it's your, it's not- I know it's your job to, and I feel for, I'm sorry. I'm not trying to be funny, but uh, it's, it's in, it's in some of these fil--, in these documents, where he's contending that ah, I was in some, some type of ah, that I'm working for Andrew Breitbart, or it's a possibility. Uhm, I just believe that, uhm, there's just so much untrue about this lawsuit against me that uhm, the only thing holding it together is the, the default judgement. So, uhm, I, I need to just go after the causation as you've directed me, and ah uh, it may seem like I'm, I'm dredging up a uh retr-- I'm trying to sneak in a retrial, but I'm not. It's my, ah, it's my amateur status, but uh. I mean, it's only like five pages. I don't, I don't know if you have to decide this case today, but, uhm, these are just like, these are just examples to, to back my attempt to back-up uh points made about him being a public figure. Uhm, that things like, well none of it was false. And, uh, I would just like you to consider all, that there have been a lot of things said, alleged about me that even Mr. Kimberlin has had to, uh, conveniently erase from your, ah, your uh judiciating, your uh, whatever the word is for, deliberating. It, it, that there's- So I'm wondering what's left with the causation uh? Yes, I wrote

Judge: You use the word these. Are you taking about Defense Exhibit 1? This packet? Is this what you're talking about?

Socrates: Yes, that uhm, I'm just saying like that

Judge: That's what you're offering as evidence.

Socrates: That's my evidence that I didn't, that I, I didn't smear him, because I was just posting on a public figure about things that have already been written about in mainstream uh magazines and, ands newpapers and on television and in court for his various criminal hearings. Uhm, I'm not looking to, I, I'm not ah- and I, and that's why I asked him like what specifically have I written? So I hear like scourge of the Jews or the scourge, or uh, that I called him a pedophile. I didn't call him a pedophile. I didn't even call him a murderer. I called him a murder suspect of Julia Scyphers, and I did, I have written that his, his actions, his setting down those bombs in Speedway, Indiana event- did eventuate in uh Carl DeLong taking his life. And that, uhm, his parole, from what I read in the Indy Star from a recent article, he was in the news, in a recent article. Uhm, it, it appears that uh his parole had- He was let out, but then his parole was revoked because uhm, he failed to make restitution, restitution to uh the wife of Carl DeLong. And uh, one of the documents in here is from a court case. Uhm, where I believe he, he, he sued the wrong person and the court officer, or I forget. I'm not an expert on this specific story. But uhm, I know there are two court documents in here, and one of them he-- and I'm not trying to give you extra work. I mean to wrap this up. I apologize for not coming in sooner. Yeah, I believe if I did come in sooner, then I could've, we could've- But I'm not even allowed to say that. Uhm, so I'm just saying I want to see causation. Lori Grace is probably, I guess Lori Grace is, might be his best piece of, uh, of uh, his best item for debate, like whether I caused him some financial problems? I do not believe I should have to pay for any of his, whatever his court costs have been, because I haven't seen anything from his uh- I've seen no proof from him according to my defense. But uhm, on the Lori Grace, like ah, I tried to say, I messed up by testifying when I was not supposed to. The Lori Grace, she has her own public website, and she contends that she brought together- I wish I had brought that to show you as evidence. But uhm, she, by penalties of perjury, ah, Lori Grace has her own website. Ah, she's the granddaughter of uh Oliver Grace. I forget what he- he was like ah, a famous American Who's Who-type person, and uh. So she has a lot of money and uhm, I, I, I notice things about- I wasn't trying to destroy Mr.- I'd never try to destroy Mr. Kimberlin. Uh, it's just a fascinating story. It's not me alone who's fascinated by this. Uhm, it's been written on by ah, recently the Indy Star. Uhm, and as for Lori Grace, I did write her an e-mail, but she has her own website. She lists her e-mail address, and she wrote in a public figure kind of way that she was the one who brought together Brett Kimberlin, Cliff Arnebeck, and I'd have to see the article she wrote to, to, to better describe it. But my point is that in the blogging world, as bloggers, it's not stalking to interact with what people write. Cyberstalking is to follow people around the internet and cause them distress.

(to be continued)

Kimberlin Versus Socrates: The Thrilla In Vanilla November 14th, 2011 (Part 4)

2012-01-15T21:08:00.000-05:00

artwork by Thusnelda

A concern troll over at the porn expert's blog has implied that my schtick isn't worth reading, that I have a big ego, and that I am no more a good source than Ron Brynaert. Well, if that's the case, I might as well state the obvious. I am at the top of the zeitgeist!

In this part, we will see that Brett Kimberlin continued to perjure himself. We will hear him allude to what Aaron Worthing has described as some double secret, exoneration agreement or wtf.

There was also another bit of perjury I'd like to delve into here, before we continue with reading the transcript of what took place on November 14th.

More Perjury (excerpted from below):

Me: So, uh, let's go with stalking. How, did, did I recently contact you?
BK: Yes.
Me: By email?
BK: By mail.
Me: What about by email?
BK: Nope.
Me: I didn't recently write you an email?
BK: Never.
Me: Did you recently write me an email, after I had asked you not to?
BK: Nope
Me: No?
JJ: He answered no, just
Me: I would like to
JJ: You can testify, when you, when it's your turn to testify. Just ask the questions.
Me: He just per-, I contend that he perjured himself.
JJ: Just ask questions.

Re: Final Service of Lawsuit
Friday, January 14, 2011 8:56 PM
From: [my redacted email address]
To: "Justice Through Music" [redacted Kimberlin email address], webmaster@mcccourt.com
Bcc: patterico@gmail.com
Stop emailing me, Speedway Bomber, or I will take this as being a form of cyberstalking.. Hey court system, check out this guy's history. He's a jail house attorney after having been convicted of domestic terrorism, impersonating DoD, perjury, and drug smuggling. Consider the source. STOP EMAILING ME KIMBERLIN. Hey court system, why are you catering to this guy? Get in touch with the good people of Indiana, their court documents, this guy's parole officer, the federal prisons he's been in, journalists, et al and you'll see what kind of convoluted mind you're dealing with. IF THIS GUY DOESN'T STOP EMAILING ME, I WILL CONSIDER IT CYBERSTALKING.

--- On Fri, 1/14/11, Justice Through Music [redacted email address] wrote:

From: Justice Through Music [redacted email address]
Subject: Final Service of Lawsuit
To: [my redacted email address], [my redacted email address]
Date: Friday, January 14, 2011, 7:22 PM ....

Take down request
Saturday, October 8, 2011 12:56 AM
From:
"Justice Through Music"
[redacted email address]
To:
[my redacted email address], [my redacted email address]
Mr. [Socrates]:

Please take this email as a formal legal request to remove all posts you have made on all websites which mention me or my organizations in any way. As you know, the Circuit Court has already issued a judgment against you for harassment, defamation and interference with business, and the District Court has issued a Peace Order prohibiting you from stalking, which includes online stalking. The District Court judge advised me that you would be violating the Peace Order by continuing to cyberstalk me and you could face arrest and imprisonment. You are under scrutiny by local law enforcement in Maryland and Massachusetts, and by the FBI in Boston and Baltimore. Every post you have made on any website since your arrest in Maryland has been copied and scrutinized by criminal profilers, and both Yahoo and Verizon investigators have been notified to monitor and stop your online stalking activities. Your posts telling people to visit Google cache to see posts that have been removed constitutes continuing stalking behavior. Your posts warning of future posts about me constitutes continued stalking behavior. Your posts justifying your conduct under First Amendment grounds constitutes continued stalking conduct.

I have consulted counsel and have been advised that your failure to remove all posts you have made about me and my organizations on various sites constitutes continued stalking as defined below. Therefore, I am asking you in writing to remove the posts within ten days or I will be compelled to ask the Circuit Court for a court order directed at the sites that host your posts which will notify them of your stalking behavior and the court orders against you. Moreover, I will advise the Circuit Court judge at the damages hearing that you have continued to use your past blog posts to harm me and my organizations by refusing to remove the blog posts. Finally, I will notify the District Court that you are violating the Peace Order by continuing to stalk and harass me, which will result in your arrest. Please do not write me back to advise me of any removals you may make. I will be immediately notified by the criminal profilers of each removal.

Please read the following carefully so you can fully understand why your conduct toward me constitutes stalking in the legal sense of the word and why the Courts have taken action against you.

Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person , in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking#cite_note-Bocij14-0 Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking, however it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking#cite_note-1
Definitions
Further information: Stalking http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalking
Stalking is a continuous process, consisting of a series of actions, each of which may be entirely legal in itself. Technology ethics professor Lambèr Royakkers http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lamb%C3%A8r_Royakkers&action=edit&redlink=1 writes that:
"Stalking is a form of mental assault, in which the perpetrator repeatedly, unwantedly, and disruptively breaks into the life-world of the victim, with whom he has no relationship (or no longer has), with motives that are directly or indirectly traceable to the affective sphere. Moreover, the separated acts that make up the intrusion cannot by themselves cause the mental abuse, but do taken together (cumulative effect)." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking#cite_note-2
CyberAngels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyberAngels has written about how to identify cyberstalking:
When identifying cyberstalking "in the field," and particularly when considering whether to report it to any kind of legal authority, the following features or combination of features can be considered to characterize a true stalking situation:malice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malice, premeditation, repetition, distress http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distress, obsession http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixation_(psychology), vendetta http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feud , no legitimate purpose, personally directed, disregarded warnings to stop, harassment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harassment , and threats http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threats .[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking#cite_note-Bocij9-3
A number of key factors have been identified:

* False accusations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusations . Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking#cite_note-4
* Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking#cite_note-5
* Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
* False victimization http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_victimization . The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases.

One final matter, if you comply with this request for removal, I will inform the court at the damages hearing that you have done so and that can be considered by the judge in mitigation of damages. On the other hand, if you do not comply, the Court will consider that in aggravation of damages.

Brett Kimberlin

Later I found out that it is not cyberstalking to send me court documents. However, the email sent by Brett Kimberlin was not an official court document, as far as I can tell in good faith. That is moot anyway. Clearly, Brett Kimberlin lied about not sending me any emails. He sent me this one on October 8th, 2011. Why did he lie?

Thrilla in Vanilla Part 4

Me: What other statements have I made, specific statements, and do you have proof of those statements to supply, so we can see this causation?
BK: Like I said, it's not just the defamation which was extreme in, to the nth degree, but it's the harassment. Continuous. I mean, he doesn't let up. He doesn't listen to anybody. He doesn't follow court orders. He doesn't remove stuff when asked to.
Me: Objection.
BK: And I
JJ: Overruled
BK: don't know where the next thing's coming from. I mean, you know, he writes an email saying that he wants to murder me to four people who are also bloggers. And then, you know, one of those bloggers felt concerned enough to contact the police, and then the FBI got involved. And, you know, it's turned into a nightmare. I've been contacted by Montgomery County police, [redacted] police, the FBI about this guy. You know, they sent me his picture, his car license plate numbers, everything, so that I you know
Me: Did you
BK: Sir, I [inaudible] a wire from the police department
JJ: Sir, he's saying it's a continuous
BK: FBI
JJ: process
BK: Right there about from the FBI
JJ: in a general sense
BK: You know.
JJ: rather than the specifics.
Me: That, I don't know how I'm able to rebut that BK: Here's the thing
JJ: Because
BK: Here's his murder
Me: I don't know how I'm able to go objection.
JJ: The murder statement is not part of this case
Me: I don't know how I'm allowed
JJ: Go to the next question, Mr. [Socrates], please.
Me: There's been no proof that I made a death threat.
JJ: You can make that argument later on.
Me: I'll try to remember.
JJ: You're here, only right now
Me: Okay.
JJ: to ask questions for Mr. Kimberlin.
Me: Alright, so you're saying that there's are there two things, defamation and, alright, I would like us to try to stick with one item at a time and try to focus in on the causation.

So, uh, let's go with stalking. How, did, did I recently contact you?
BK: Yes.
Me: By email?
BK: By mail.
Me: What about by email?
BK: Nope.
Me: I didn't recently write you an email?
BK: Never.
Me: Did you recently write me an email, after I had asked you not to?
BK: Nope
Me: No?
JJ: He answered no, just
Me: I would like to
JJ: You can testify, when you, when it's your turn to testify. Just ask the questions.
Me: He just per-, I contend that he perjured himself.
JJ: Just ask questions.
Me: I don't- Yes, sir. And I, uhm, I contacted you by answering the uhm interrogatories, correct? That's the only way I contacted you?
BK: Yes.
Me: And wasn't it my obligation to respond to those interrogatories?
BK: Yes.
Me: Do you strike most, you've already stricken, so now you're saying that, uhm, we're only focusing in on my usernames of Prepostericity and socrates?
BK: I'm not striking anything. You asked me a question. I answered the question.
Me: So, you're contending that, uhm, from the Kid Kemona blog, uhm, do you believe that I wrote as anonymous army?
BK: I don't, I didn't even bring up the Kid Kenoma blog in my complaint. I mention socrates and Prepostericity. That's it, okay?
Me: Can you for the court, so you're contending that when we're looking for causation, that you're going to, we're only going to stick to socrates and Prepostericity as my usernames?
BK: Judge, I'm gonna object. I mean, he's got a list of forty names that he's used or not used, and he wants to.
Me: We're not
JJ: Yeah alright, I'm going to sustain the objection. We're not gonna get into, if you want to get into statements, okay, but if you want to talk about who's blogging what
Me: I'm just saying there's a pattern. I know.
JJ: What I'm saying to you is who's blogging what is not at issue. You have a default judgement entered against you on the claims that have been brought by the plaintiff. We're only here to talk about damages. If you want to ask about specific statements, and how they caused damage or didn't, you can do that.
Me: Sir, I've asked him about two of them, and I've asked for as many of as he can offer to the court with proof, so that you can decide whether what I wrote caused it.
JJ: Just ask him the question. How did statement X cause you damage?
Me: But we don't have any that, can you please provide to the court some statements that I made with proof that I made those statements, and how they caused you, and whether they were false?
BK: It's not just the statement. If he had written one article about me or something, that would have been one thing. This was a continuous pattern of harassment
Me: Objection.
BK: over three years.
JJ: Overruled.
BK: Over three years, most of it done anonymously, attacking me, my organisations, my partners, my business, my reputation, and it, it was persistent. It, it included false accusations. He, he went out and dug up, gathered information and and conflated it with, with other false information and made it sound like I was a, a monster. And he did this, he, he, he asked other people to, to, to do the same thing. He, he posted this stuff on blogs and, and, and tried to get an army of, of
Me: Have you supplied proof of that?
BK: people to, to, to come after me. I'm testifying. And uhm, this was done to harass me, and that's, that's the point. That's where it comes down to stalking. You know, it's not an isolated incident of somebody writing a single article but rather a pattern of stalking and harassment. It's online stalking. That's what it's called. Uhm, and you know. So
JJ: That's enough. Next question.
Me: Yes, sir.
JJ: It's a pattern of harassment which is what he's saying.
Me: Uhm okay, that, uhm, how many lawsuits have you filed over your lifetime?
BK: Have no idea.
JJ: Not relevant.
Me: Not relevant? Uhm, and just, just so we're clear on this, you, you're contending you were never sent back to prison for a parole violation?
JJ: He's already answered that.
Me: And you said no?
JJ: He's already answered that. Next question.
Me: Okay, I'll order a, a , a copy of the, okay, uhm. What statements have you brought to the court that you contend were part of the causation, that I, that I wrote? Can you please share that with the court. So we
BK: Again, again
Me: You don't have any?
BK: Stalking and harassment is
Me: Do you have any statements?
JJ: Don't interrupt.
BK: Each, each individual statement or act could be completely legal, but it's the pattern of unwanted series of actions by someone, you know, gettting repeatedly unwantingly disrupting my life every single day. When I would wake up, there would be a Google alert from Mr. socrates, Mr. Prepostericity, Mr. [my real first and last name] saying something about murder or pedophilia or fraud or, or terrorism or whatever
Me: What did I write about?
JJ: Don't interrupt him.
BK: It was, it was you know, over and over and over and over. And this is, this is what it comes down to, you know. Uhm, this is what stalking is, and this is what this man has done to me and he continues to do it right now. He's harassing me right now, bringing up 32 year old cases
JJ: It's not harassment. It's directly related to
BK: Well, okay.
JJ: to reputation.
BK: Okay.
JJ: Next question.
Me: Uhm, I guess I should try to wrap up.
JJ: That would be good.
Me: Uhm, and uh, hmmm. Could you, uh, am I only allowed to ask yes or no questions?
JJ: No.
Me: Uhm, could you share with the court, uhm, what you thought might have happened to Michael Connell and uh Karl Rove's
JJ: Uh, I don't
Me: involvement?
JJ: How does that
BK: Objection.
JJ: have something to do with damages?
Me: Uhm, well, if he's contending that by my calling him, uh, a conspiracy bunk uh, supplying conspiracy bunk, yet it can be shown that he has been a supplier of conspiracy bunk, then I don't see how there's any causation. I don't see how telling the truth about someone, uhm, becoming a public figure on a controversial issue.
JJ: You can explore, but I mean
Me: Did you
JJ: Wait a second. From what I'm hearing, it sounds like we could have a full day trial on whether something is true or not true on one given act. I'll give you a little bit of leeway, if you want to explore an area where you think what was stated was the truth, and therefore should not be compensable in damages. But you might want to ask if Mr. Kimberlin is even making any claims for damages based upon a certain set of facts. If he's not, then it doesn't matter if they're true or not.
Me: Uh-huh, but those usernames, uhm. Do you believe, uhm, my blogging on your alleging to have sold marijuana to Vice-Presidential candidate Dan Quayle caused you, uh, financial distress and/or emotional, financial problems and/or emotional distress?
BK: Judge, uh,
JJ: He's asking if that's part of your claim.
BK: That's not part of my claim.
JJ: Okay, that's not part of his claim, so it's not relevant.
BK: And second of all, you know, I have an excellent reputation in this community. I work with kids all the time. I work with Congress members all the time. I work with community leaders all the time. You know, this is the issue, not what happened 32 years ago. And my, you know, I have a wonderful reputation with my kids at school, uhm, in my very nice community of Bethesda. Uhm, and, you know, what happens to somebody when they're a kid, and they redeem themselves, and they come out and they, they have a nice job and that they're doing something for the community, I think is important. And to be constantly dragged down by somebody harassing me, you know, after I've done all these, these terrific things with young people and kids and showing that people should get involved with the world and, and engage and, and not, not do violent acts and things like that. I mean, one of my campaigns is stop domestic terrorism. It's all about not engaging in violent acts. And one of my campaigns on my uh uh uh, of my non-profit is to have, have these protesters in Middle East countries come out and speak out against their dictators. And uhm, these are the kind of things that I do. This is the reputation that I have. You know, of bringing people together and speaking out against injustice. This is what, what I devote my life to. I made some mistakes when I was a kid. I admit that. I've never said I didn't. I apologise for it. You know, some of those things have been put aside. I'm not on parole. That stuff was all dealt with through the Department of Justice. It's over.

You know, I had a fifty year sentence for something I didn't do. And it's been resolved. They, they don't have me on parole. I have no committment at all to that old case. But the point is, you know, he wants to keep pounding it and pounding it and bringing up old stuff. You know, accusations of all these terrible things that I was never even charged with and even that I was charged with and then have since been resolved. And, and he wants to ruin my reputation now. It's like I don't have any chance to redeem myself in a person's eyes like his. I just have to constantly deal with stuff that happened 32 years ago, and I have to, you know, I can't ever get ahead. I can't ever push my non-profit to get any extra cash because of him.
JJ: I gotcha.
BK: You know, that's it.
JJ: I gotcha. Okay. Anything else, Mr. [Socrates]?
Me: Uhm, so part of the damage that I've caused you, uhm, you believe is because, are you claiming because I blogged about you claiming you were an exonerated, did you ever claim that you were an exonerated, uh, political prisoner?
BK: I've never claimed that publically.
Me: You, you deny setting the bombs that you were convicted of?
BK: Absolutely.
Me: And
BK: Absoultely.
Me: you admit you weren't exonerated?
BK: Judge, Mr. [Socrates]
JJ: Just answer the question because
BK: Mr. [Socrates] is trying to get into a lawsuit that was filed against the Department of Justice. It was settled in a confidentiality agreement, and I'm not going to discuss it. I'm gonna object.
JJ: What was your question, whether he contended he was a political prisoner?
Me: Uhm, I don't know how I can speak without getting into me testifying.
JJ: Okay.
Me: But there is something that I wanted to, that I'm trying to get at. I, I, I would like to just do a few examples. I don't want to overburden
JJ: It sounds like you're asking him about a case that is subject to a confidentiality agreement. So why don't you move on to something else. I don't think it's really related to the damage issue.
Me: But, do you claim that my posting about you having been a convicted bomber has caused you financial difficulties?
BK: Yes.
Me: What did I write about you being a convicted bomber that hadn't been published in main stream media?
BK: You've harassed me. You've done it continuously.
Me: What did I
BK: You never stop.
Me: I get it. I understand, sir.
JJ: Okay.
BK: You get
(Kimberlin getting agitated- inaudible, speaking over Judge Jordan)
JJ: I'm not gonna have you arguing back and forth.
Me: I'm not arguing.
BK: He gets his kicked off of one blog. He gets banned from a blog, and he goes and starts another blog. Or starts posting
JJ: You've made it clear. It's a continuing pattern. I got it.
BK: You know.
Me: Uhm, I'm not a lawyer, but I believe that the witness is acting hostile.
JJ: Well, I'll step in, if I need to. I don't right now.
Me: I just believe I'm not being able
JJ: Just ask your next question.
Me: to, uhm. Hmmm. Okay, I guess, uhm, there's nothing to ask you about specific comments that I've written, because they're not presented to the court to, uh, debate or uh, to judiciate over the causation. Uh, let's go to stalking then. I mean, there's got to be a finite set of ways that I've, you allege I've damaged your life. So, let's go to stalking, I guess. Uhm, have I ever called you at your house?
BK: No.
Me: Have I ever emailed you?
JJ: (coughs) Excuse me, let's just on the stalking issue, just a second, what are you contending your damages are from a stalking point?
BK: Well, like I said, it's a pattern of harassment. It's, it's a long [inaudible] a mental assault, in which I was repeatedly and unwantedly attacked.
JJ: So it's the repeated postings?
BK: Yeah, it's the repeated posting. I mean this is, this new phenomena online stalking. You don't have to call somebody at home. You don't have to
JJ: I don't need you arguing the case.
BK: Okay.
JJ: Go ahead. Let's move onto something else.
Me: I, I, uhm
JJ: We're repeating
Me: Okay.
JJ: at this point.
Me: Uhm, why did you ask about "Louis Aubuchont" in the interrogatories?
BK: Objection.
JJ: Okay, sustained.
Me: [inaudible] it's irrelevant?
JJ: Sustained, yeah.
Me: Okay. Uhm. Okay. Uhm, can, can you tell me anything specific that I wrote, I'll just ask this one last time. Can you give me anything substantial, specific, a quote that I've written that we can look at
BK: Yeah. You called me scum of the Earth or pond scum. You remember that?
[inaudible talking over]
JJ: Don't ask him questions. Just [inaudible talking over] wait a second. Just tell him the specifics. Fair question.
BK: Okay. Pond scum. Scum of the Earth. Uhm, you said I should be in jail forever.
Me: Do you have proof of that?
BK: Yes.
Me: Have you supplied it to the court?
JJ: Are you finished with the last answer on specifics?
BK: Are you asking me?
JJ: Yeah.
BK: Uhm, uh, well he called me a conman. He called me a pedophile, a murderer
JJ: Where did he call you a pedophile? Do you have that statement?
BK: a murder suspect. I, I don't have that statement, but it was in my, I believe in my original complaint.
JJ: Okay.
BK: And in his uh, again in his murder email, you know, he, he continues, he repeatedly said that he wanted to contact my parole officers and have me thrown in jail. And uhm, that uhm
Me: Can we read that back
BK: Sure
Me: and uh, take his specific statement and see if, that he just made, and see if they line up?
JJ: No.
Me: Okay, sir.
BK: And, I mean, in that email, he says Brett (to be continued)

Kimberlin Versus Socrates: The Thrilla In Vanilla November 14th, 2011 (Part 3)

2012-01-14T20:59:00.000-05:00

from Time Magazine's Wizard of Odd
Time Photo Illustration: Kimberlin:
Chriss Wade for Time; Voting Machine:
Brent Humphreys / Redux for Time

The phrase Thrilla in Vanilla, coined by donkeytale, was no doubt pure brilliance on his part. However, what has been going on here has been more akin to the Rumble in the Jungle with Ali and his rope-a-dope.

Brett Kimberlin should have walked away with his shallow default win. Now that he has reopened the case, he has asked to be investigated for perjury. He has perhaps also opened the door to be investigated for collusion with others in regards to my being harassed via cyber crimes. It does appear Brett Kimberlin has been relaying information to internet predator Neal Rauhauser, who then has shuffled such info over to fake internet journalist Ron Brynaert.

Anyway, I will go with the schtick developed in the previous part of this eight part series. We'll start with notes and then proceed to more testimony from the November 14th court session.

Notes

*** Since there was no proof in the case file of what I allegedy said, there was zero proof of causation to so-called damages, period. With a number of examples below, it should become clear to impartial readers that Judge Jordan did mail in his judging responsibilities by not looking closely at the whole file. He was, imho, clearly biased against myself and in favour of Brett Kimberlin. His attitude, to me, reeked of let's get this thing over with, for I have arrest warrants to sign and a club sandwich in chambers going stale.

*** I hate to harp on Judge Jordan, but his "next question" schtick was bizarre. Why didn't he ask Kimberlin what his sentence was, when he got paroled, and whether he had ever broken that parole? Clear cut criminal perjury was committed by Speedway Bomber Brett Coleman Kimberlin. Judge Jordan missed out on his chance to make a positive, judicial impact. He choked.

*** More perjury:
Me: Have you, have you emerged as a public player in controversial issues?
BK: No.
Me: Such as election fraud?
BK: No.

One need only look at his efforts with Ohio 2004 and his hoaxing it up with Cliff Arnebeck to realise that was yet another Kimberlin lie made under oath. Being a public figure doesn't mean one has to be all over tv or the internet. He may not be big time in our faces, but he has been somewhat visible. As Mark Singer informed us many years ago, Brett Kimberlin apparently has had the desire to become a public icon.

*** More proven perjury:
Me: Have you, have you emerged as a public player in controversial issues?
BK: No.
Me: Such as election fraud?
BK: No.
Me: Haven't you posted video, haven't you been on videos of yourself discussing election fraud issues, with uh, for example Cliff Arnebeck and posted those on youtube?
BK: Judge, I think he's asking if I've ever interviewed anyone? [JJ: hm-hm] I assume. I have interviewed people, and those interviews are online.
JJ: Okay.
BK: But they're not, there's never a picture of me. I'm just a voice interviewing a Congress member or a lawyer or a
JJ: Are you identified on them?
BK: No.
JJ: By name or anything?
BK: Never.
Me: I think that needs to be verified.
JJ: You're conducting cross-examination. You can ask questions.

From a Brad Friedman "article" titled, GOP Tech Guru Mike Connell 'High IQ Forrest Gump...At Scene of Every Single Crime' Say Ohio Attorneys

After last week's presser, Velvet Revolution's Brett Kimberlin sat down to follow up with Arnebeck and attorney/investigative journalist Bob Fitrakis, who participated in both the original '04 election lawsuits and has reported in detail on the related matters continuously since then at the Columbus Free Press.

VR Speaks to Ohio Lawyers About Karl Rove and Election Fraud

Liar, Liar pants on fire!

*** In the last part, we saw how Brett appeared to be saying he's never been involved with waterboarding. Links were supplied proving otherwise. Here's a screenshot from his youtube video.

Me: Where is the proof? (silence) How can I cause damage to your ventures by calling you a pedophile, if I didn't call you a pedophile? How did I
JJ: Do you have a copy of the statement where that is?
BK: I do. I didn't bring those with me though. I mean he's written hundreds of posts about me. Literally.
JJ: Is that in your complaint?
BK: Yes.
JJ: That specific one?
BK: I believe so.
Me: Do you (to Kimberlin), (to Judge) do you want me to wait?
JJ: No, go ahead.
Me: Do you contend that I wrote a parody site with your image on it? Is that part of the damages? I know, I believe you entered that into this? Do you believe that, did I write that parody site? Uhm, or who did? Who wrote that parody site? Did Google get back to you?
BK: Judge, he's asking
JJ: What are you asking about a parody site?
BK: He's asking about
Me: Well, he
BK: Another. I filed a motion to disclose who wrote a parody site [JJ: Uh-huh.] with my image on it, and it's pending before the court.
JJ: Okay. Is that part of your claim here?
BK: No, it's
Me: He's dropping that?
BK: No, I'm not dropping it. I'm just saying
Me: Well, if he's not dropping it
JJ: Wait a second. We'll talk
BK: I filed that motion about a month ago and haven't heard back from the court on it.
JJ: In this case?
BK: Yeah. And Google said that they would comply with the court's orders since about it to tell me who put up that image.
JJ: Okay, but the parody site is not part of your claim for damages?
BK: It's not his specific site, as far as I know yet.
JJ: Okay.
Me: Okay uhm
JJ: You know, I'm gonna take a very quick break. I've got two detectives to just return a search warrant. Uhm, Deputy, I appreciate you being here. If you can hang with us. Mr. [Socrates] is subject to a protective order with respect to Mr. Kimberlin. And that's in large part why we've asked for you to be here. Okay.
Court Babe: All Rise (schwing)
(recess)
Court Babe: Rise
JJ: Please have a seat. Pardon for the interruption. There might be more, because I'm doing two things today. I'm doing court, and I'm due in chambers with what's called duty reviews. So, there's search warrants or things like that need to get signed. I need to do that. Go ahead Mr. [Socrates}.
Me: I appreciate that the court is trying to figure out causation. I'm not allowed to make a statement.
JJ: You can make a statement, when it's your turn to testify. Right now
Me: I follow, sir.
JJ: You watch tv? Cross-examination?
Me: Hmm-mmm.
JJ: This is a witness for you to ask questions and cross-examination.
Me: Thank you.
JJ: If you
Me: I understand. Did I cause, so you're contending that my blogging about you being a perjurer, having been convicted of being a perjurer, caused you financial damage?
BK: I'm saying that your three year campaign
Me: I want that question answered.
JJ: Hold up.
BK: I'm saying that your three year campaign against me, posting stuff all over the internet on scores of blogs or many blogs, and calling me everything under the book, uhm, and regurgitating stuff that happened
Me: We're going to
JJ: Wait a second. Let him finish.
BK: 32 years ago is an unwarranted harassment and defamation. You've harassed me. You've harassed me continuously for three years, until I exposed you. And then you continue to harass me. And you're continuing to harass me now. And you're trying to get stuff in the record, so that you can post it online. I know what you're up to, Mr. [Socrates].
Me: I object! He's making psychoanalysis of me that's
BK: (Talking over me)
JJ: Don't argue back and forth. Overruled. Next question.
Me: (quick sarcastic chuckle) I would like us to get into specific details of you mention certain key phrases that, I mean I'm not, look, I don't want a general picture. We get it. You think, uhm, I'm making a statement. Well, I won't continue with the certain train of thing, because I do, I do need a ruling from Your Honour about whether he, Brett Kimberlin is a public or private figure, in my opinion. Humbly. Uhm, what (a bit frustrated)
JJ: I haven't heard enough to make that determination.
BK: I object anyway. That's not an issue here. It's not an issue in damages.
JJ: It would be an issue in damages. It goes to reputation.
BK: I don't even post on my blogs. I have a family. I work behind the scenes. This man has taken an organisation that involves many people, many people, and taken something that happened 32 years ago in my past and tried to destroy my business and my organisation, and all these other people that are associated with me by targeting me, and it's a hit job. It's a hit. It's a harassment. A hit job that this guy is conducting on me.
JJ: Okay.
BK: you know.
JJ: Next question.
Me: So you don't think it's relevant what you were convicted of in the past? And that's why you didn't include it in this lawsuit?
JJ: I think he's made it clear.
Me: Okay.
JJ: 32 years ago.
Me: 32 years ago, uhm, would more recently than 32 years ago were you sent back to prison for a parole violation?
BK: No. No. I'm not on parole. You keep telling people
Me: No.
JJ: One second.
BK: He's telling people I'm on parole. I'm not on parole.
Me: I don't know if he's on parole. I apologise.
JJ: You can't talk over each other.
BK: Well ...
JJ: Next question.
Me: More recently than 32 years ago, from your original trial if that's the date you're getting to, were you released
BK: I am not on parole.
Me: Were you released and then sent back to prison for a parole violation for failure to pay compensation to uh, Mrs. Delong, the wife of Carl Delong, who took his own life after those bombs tore off half his body?
BK: No, I wasn't. [JJ: Okay.]
Me: I believe I'd have to check
JJ: That's that's your question. Get to the next question.
Me: Yes, sir. Uhm, do you think private individuals get mentioned, uhm, are you aware of The Wizard of Odd article from Time Magazine on yourself?
BK: Yes.
Me: Do you think this is the type of thing that a private, that's done, type of article that's written about private individuals?
BK: Private individuals get written about all the time.
Me: Uh-huh.
BK: It doesn't matter if you have an article written about you that you're not, that you're a public figure. I'm not a public figure.
Me: Have you, have you emerged as a public player in controversial issues?
BK: No.
Me: Such as election fraud?
BK: No.
Me: Haven't you posted video, haven't you been on videos of yourself discussing election fraud issues, with uh, for example Cliff Arnebeck and posted those on youtube?
BK: Judge, I think he's asking if I've ever interviewed anyone? [JJ: hm-hm] I assume. I have interviewed people, and those interviews are online.
JJ: Okay.
BK: But they're not, there's never a picture of me. I'm just a voice interviewing a Congress member or a lawyer or a
JJ: Are you identified on them?
BK: No.
JJ: By name or anything?
BK: Never.
JJ: Okay.
Me: I think that needs to be verified.
JJ: You're conducting cross-examination. You can keep asking questions.
Me: Yes. Just trying my best. Okay, uhm, we'll skip ahead to, uh, I'm having trouble with my eyesight. The printout's kind of small. I'm looking at the exhibit K; Chamber of Commerce Raises Security Concerns After Group Puts Bounty On CEO. Have you been publicly involved in a campaign against the Chamber of Commerce?
BK: Have I? No. Not me. My organisation has a campaign called Stop the Chamber dot com. And it exposes
Me: How is that not you then involved?
JJ: Don't interrupt him.
BK: It's not me. It's my organisation, or it's an organisation in which I'm involved with. That's it. The organisation is not me. There's a lot of people involved with these organisations.
Me: Your Honour, can I ask you a legal question?
JJ: You're conducting cross-examination. If you need clarification for something you can.
Me: Okay.
JJ: I can't give you legal advice.
Me: Uhm, here's an exhibit that I was able to include. I wasn't
JJ: You'll have a chance
Me: Do you
JJ: You'll have a chance to testify.
Me: Do you contend that from the Kid Kenoma blog that you submitted to the court, are you claiming that I was all those usernames?
BK: I
JJ: That's not going to damages. Let's stick to. There was a very real issue about defamation, interference with business, etc. and connecting those torts to damages. That's fair game. But we're not gonna go into the background.
Me: Does Lori Grace, I understood, Sir, Does Lori Grace have a public website?
BK: I don't know what Lori Grace has.
Me: You don't know that Lori Grace has a website?
BK: I have no idea.
Me: Are you aware that she has something called the Sunshine
BK: I have no idea.
Me: You have no idea what she does?
BK: No.
Me: Are you aware that she wrote an article on her website about, uhm, putting together, bringing together yourself and Cliff Arnebeck, and uh, concerning issues on election fraud, that that's been posted on her website?
BK: I have no idea.
Me: Okay. uhm, I don't have the proof of that Your Honour, but I can by penalty. I know. I'm sorry.
JJ: you'll have a chance to testify. Let's move on.
Me: Okay. Yes, sir. I'd like to get, I understand, Sir. Uhm, which usernames are you contending, so we can focus in on the causation, which usernames of mine are you contending caused you damages? We've already ruled out the parody website. I guess that's to the side. What usernames on this long list you supplied to the court do you contend I wrote as, and for each one, what did I write that was false and caused you anxiety and caused you to lose money?
BK: Socrates, Prepostericity.
Me: Anything else? Any of the other ones?
BK: Those are the two main ones.
Me: Then why did you supply this long list of all these usernames? What was the purpose of that?
BK: Objection
JJ: Yeah. Sustained.
Me: I'm just
JJ: It's not going to causation or damages.
Me: I just. I can't button up.
JJ: You'll get a chance to testify.
Me: Okay.
JJ: On relevant issues.
Me: Are we done with that scourge of the, what are you contending I said about the Jews, that they're the scourge of the people, and that caused you
BK: Objection.
Me: That's the type of thing that caused you financial damage? That I wrote that?
JJ: Okay. The part of the question about whether that statement caused
BK: (inaudible)
JJ: damages is appropriate.
BK: That statement did not cause damages.
Me: That statement did not cause damage? You're removing that from this case?
JJ: Okay
BK: That's not part of this case.
JJ: Move on.
Me: Uhm, you're contending that I blogged that you're a pedophile, and that caused you damage?
BK: Yes.
Me: Do you have proof of that statement, so we can see the causation is actually true?
BK: It's defamation per se.
Me: But do you have the actual words that I allegedly wrote that called you a pedophile, so the court can see that what you are alleging is true? You know, if it's true. How can something cause something, if it's not true?
BK: Yeah, I don't have that in the.
Me: So you're gonna take that away?
BK: I'm not taking anything away.
JJ: The question is where that, is your question where that was posted or?
BK: It was posted on his blog, I believe.
Me: I'm contending that it's immaterial, because he's supplied no proof that I wrote that. And I didn't. I'm sorry. I know. I'm sorry for that last statement.
JJ: Okay.
Me: What other statements have I made, specific statements, and do you have proof of those statements to supply, so we can see (to be continued)

Kimberlin Versus Socrates: The Thrilla In Vanilla November 14th, 2011 (Part 2)

2012-01-13T22:38:00.001-05:00

I'm always the last to know. I didn't realise until last night Brett Kimberlin's second absurd attempt to have me imprisoned was struck down by wise Judge Rupp the Magnificent.

Anyway, the best is yet to come in regards to revealing what happened on November 14th. I was there. It was incredible. You actually had to be there to truly start to understand how surreal Brett Kimberlin is as an individual.

There were a few court clerks, myself, Brett, that court copper, uhm, and Judge Jordan. That's it. Now, Jordan wasn't the kind of man to give me any credit. But I could sense what those few regular people in the room were thinking. It was, "Omg, wtf, this is incredible."

You can't lie and say someone else claimed Jews are the scourge of the Earth and should be put in ovens. What the hell is Brett Kimberlin's problem? And why the hell didn't Judge Jordan do his job? Kimberlin is obviously delusional. What is Jordan's excuse for being such an incompetent judge? He didn't even deliberate on all the presented documents. He didn't flinch once, each time Kimberlin said something obviously outrageous. Judge Rupp appears to be digesting every nook and cranny of this case. Judge Jordan mailed it in like a hack. How does someone like him get appointed to a Judgeship. He's the Frank Burns of judges.

some notes
*** This thing about Jews being the scourge of the Earth and should be put in ovens sounded like perjury to me.
*** Here's more that sounded like criminal perjury. Kimberlin said he didn't waterboard himself. Yet according to this link and this video, he was indeed waterboarded.

*** Velvet Revolution has a membership base of over a million people? Is that true?

*** Kimberlin said, "I've had to post his picture for my mother, my wife, and my kids to see what he looks like." Was Brett involved with the illegal uploading of Sept. 14th court audio that was accompanied by my driver's licence photo? Has Brett Kimberlin been working hand in hand with internet predator Neal Rauhauser to try to psychologically torture and silence me via cyber crimes and his illegal manipulation of the Montgomery County court?

*** "I've had to deal with the FBI." Really? And what was up with former ambulance chasing Judge Jordan asking, "Was that the murder threat from two months ago?" There was no murder threat, and Jordan shouldn't be promoting such lies in his court room. Imho, he should be reprimanded or worse for his handling of this case.

*** Brett said Lori Grace's support went down to 80%, but I think he meant it went down 80%.

*** Kimberlin is a deluded fabulist. He's a confidence man. Here's an example. He said no one informed him funding was stifled due to my posts. Yet that didn't prevent him from saying they did stop it, because they read my schtick after googling.

*** Kimberlin clearly perjured himself near the end of this part, when the discussion focused on himself as a murder suspect. Keep in mind that many documents, as prepared by Liberty Chick, were entered in as evidence proving I never defamed Brett Kimberlin. Judge Jordan messed up in that I proved this case had no merits. The judgement thus should have been $1 and no court costs. To repeat, imho, Judge Jordan should be censured, sanctioned, or whatever the fock is done to Judges who wet their pants like this while on the bench.

*** I never wrote Brett Kimberlin was a pedophile. I only posted what had been reported by reputable sources. As with his testimony saying I had written Jews are the scourge of the Earth and should be thrown in ovens, he outright perjured himself. In my humble opinion, Brett Kimberlin should be returned to prison and finish out his original sentence. Or maybe it's time for him to intimidate the Feds that he'll rat them out in regards to their double secret exoneration agreement, if they attempt to return him to the penitentiary.

Woohoo, over here Ricky Boy Jordan and Bwett, it's time to board the clue train.

(please note "Thrilla in Vanilla" was coined by historic good troll donkeytale)

Part 2: The Thrilla In Vanilla

Judge Jordan: What are the posts? I'm just hearing conclusions. I need to have the statements.

Brett Kimberlin: You mean, the actual, you want the physical post?

Jordan: Not the physical post but the words.

Kimberlin: He, like I said, he said I was a pedophile. He said that I was a conman, a fraudster. Uhm, he said that I was a murderer. That I was responsible for people's deaths.

These were just straight out. He didn't even mince any words. Uhm, he just came right out and said it.

Jordan: Those contained in your complaint?

BK: Yes. (papers shuffling) This was uhm, this was the order from the court originally where the court ordered him to remove all these posts and defamatory statements in them. Uhm, which he refused to do.

Jordan: Do you have any printouts of those?

BK: I didn't bring those.

I mean, in his, uhm, He filed this with the court recently, the plaintiff's interrogatories, you know. He says the same thing. That I'm a bomber. I'm a conman. That I'm a drug smuggler. I'm a murder suspect. I'm a uh spreading conspiracy bunk in pursuit of hefty donations.

Let's see. That uh, I mean, he just goes on and on and on. And the whole reason for this is that he wanted to destroy my business. I mean, he said it. He said it straight out.

You know, he wrote. I have an email that he wrote to this funder. (Kimberlin reads aloud my letter to Lori Grace available in Part 1.)

There's his email to a funder, a person that's been funding one of my organisations or both for years. [Judge: Okay] Uhm I mean, this was his whole intent to destroy the funding base for my business by posting garbage on Google. So people that read it. And and and, you know, when I got denied grants from different places like the USAID, which I had this one. It was, it looked like it was going to be granted, and then all of a sudden at the last minute, they did a Google search of me. And I'm sure Mr. [Socrates] will get a kick out of this, you know. They read his posts, and they decided not to give me that $1.25 million grant.

Jordan: Did they tell you why?

BK: Well, they're not gonna say I read Mr. [Socrates'] posts, you know. But, when they go to Google me and see this stuff. I mean, here's their denial, you know. USAID has completed its uh review of your submission, and your application was not selected.

I mean, that's that's what, I mean I know what they told me on the phone. Uhm, and and uh another grant was was denied the same, the same thing.

JJ: Did they explain any of that as to why (interrupted)

BK: They don't explain it in the letter, but Mr. [Socrates] posted this on August 10th. This is the donor that he wrote to, and he posted her picture on a post. And not only did he post her picture, but he says if high priced donors find out the truth about me, then they won't donate to me. And he's the one that's going to tell them the truth by with all these lies that he's saying. He wants to tell them that he was cyberstalked, defamed, and had death threats made on him due to my writing. It's not my money he's after. He's trying to hide his tarnished image from people like this funder.

And so this is his M.O.. He wants to destroy the business. He wants to destroy. I don't know how many people have not donated to us over the past three years because they've read his stuff.

But, you know, I've asked for a lot less than the donations that have been denied or these grants that have been denied. You know. The request to the State Department and the USAID were for a lot more money than what I've asked for in damages here.

So, I think we can presume that we've lost a considerable amount of money.

JJ: Well, the standard of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence. You've got to show a causal connection between defamatory statements and losses. (Bk: Okay.) Financial losses. Uhm, so, the issue of presumption is not something I can go on.

BK: You know, in these cases of types of accusations of fraud. I mean, we're members in good standing with Network for Good, with Guidestar, with the Better Business Bureau. We've never had a single complaint against us ever in ten years. And yet this guy is out there, you know, saying that we're fraudsters and we're conning people and we're taking all this money from rich heiresses, you know. And it's ludicrous. I mean, (giggles) you know like I said, I deal with Congress members. I deal with civic leaders. I deal all the time with outstanding individuals, and and I never have this kind of of of stuff, you know.

But then people read this online and they say, Brad what's this about this guy saying this and that and da da da da da. And you know, I have to deal with it all the time. And that's what he wants. And that's what he gets off on.

JJ: What's the name of your organisation?

BK: I have two organisations, Justice Through Music, which has been in business for about ten years. The executive director is Jeff Cohen, and uhm it's a Bethedsa based operation. And we work with young people, mostly to get them involved with voting. We've registered tens of thousands of kids to vote. And we get them involved with social causes. We work with very famous artists and bands and get them talking to kids about the importance of getting involved with the world. And so on and so forth.

The other organisation is called Velvet Revolution. Velvet Revolution is an organisation that has over 150 organisations affiliated with it nationwide, with membership base of over a million people. And we have, we deal with a lot of issues. Uhm, presently we're dealing with the voting issues. We were instrumental in getting paper ballots placed in Maryland and many other states. And we're involved with anti-corruption campaigns against people in both government and corporations. And like I said, we work very closely with members of Congress on this.

JJ: Okay, are both of those entities incorporated or partnerships?

BK: No, they're Maryland based right here in (inaudible). They're non-profits.

JJ: They're both non-profit corporations? [BK: Hmm hmmm] Okay. And what do you have to say in terms of the ultimate financial loss to you personally, and how you tie that, if you contend it, to the defamatory statements that you've been talking about?

BK: Well, it's not just that. Like I said, in my complaint I allege interference with business too, and that was ruled in my favor. Uhm, so it's not just the defamation.

JJ: The problem with interference with business is you're the only party. So, what I'm getting at is what's the impact on you personally?

BK: Well, I mean as far as emotional you know, this guy threatened to murder me, and I don't know if he's gonna come to my house with a gun or not. I've had to post his picture for my mother, my wife, and my kids to see what he looks like.

You know, I've had to deal with the FBI.

JJ: Was that the murder threat from two months ago? [BK: Yeah.] That's not part of your lawsuit? [BK: No, well it's (giggles) August.]

Socrates: Objection
JJ: Overruled.

BK: But, the thing is I mean he's been, he did this anonymously keep in mind for three years. I didn't know who he was. I didn't know if he was down the street. I didn't know if he was, you know, in another state. Whatever. And it was this court that ordered Google to disclose who he was.

And so, you know I'm getting all this flack, you know these grenades thrown at me from all over the internet, and I'm wondering who is this guy? Where is he coming from? You know, is somebody paying him? You know, what's going on here? Is this opposition to my business?

So there was a lot of sleepless nights and emotional upset. My wife and kids were upset. And my mother was upset. And you know, I would get calls from people around the country wondering what is this guy? What is he saying? You know, and so you know as far as personal financial loss, I mean, like I said I put out personally out of my pocket, you know, roughly a thousand dollars, you know. But, but as far as emotional cost, I mean, it's been devastating. Uhm, you know, when these kinds of things happen you know, you're, things go not as smooth at home. You know, you're testy and upset and you know fearful, and things like that.

JJ: I understand what you're saying in terms of people don't tell you why you don't get funding. Can you tie that decision, those decisions directly to what Mr. [Socrates] has said about you that (interrupted)

BK: Well, like I said, I mean, I know that when he, you know, wrote this email to this lady, she freaked out, she called me up. You know, then he posted her picture online on a post, and you know, said that kind of stuff about her. I mean, and then you know she, she's a very well-liked person in California and does a lot of very respectable work out there. Uhm, and for him to post this stuff online, uhm and make her, put her in fear? I mean, she called, she immediately when she got that, you know, she sent it to me. She said, Brett what the heck is this? Who is this guy, you know?

JJ: Did she cut off her financial support?
BK: Uh, she severely diminished it, if that's what you want to ask. Uhm, I mean it's gone down to 80%, since she got that.

JJ: Did she tell you it was because of the postings?

BK: Uhm, she didn't say that exactly, no. I mean, she just, she's been more distant since then. And you know, just for your own, for proof, this is from Yahoo, and it shows. That's one of his email accounts. He's admitted that he's done this. So I don't (inaudible).

JJ: Yeah, I have an issue about the connection. It's drawing the connection of causation. (interrupted)

BK: But I can say this. You know, I don't make that much money in my business, you know. I take a salary of about $20,000 a year, and had I gotten these, you asked about my personal loss, you know, had we gotten these grants with the USAID or the State Department. Uhm, which again I can tell you they looked like they were going to be granted according to all the preliminaries were and all the discussions I had there, and then all of a sudden, they did a Google search, and they said they couldn't approve it, you know. And uhm, so had those been granted, my salary would have gone up considerably. (JJ: Okay.)

JJ: Anything else before Mr. [Socrates] has a chance to ask you questions, if he has any? [BK: No.]

Okay. Mr. [Socrates], you may ask questions. It's called cross-examination. [Mr. [Socrates]: Thank you.] But, I want you to understand, as I tell all parties that are not represented by an attorney, that if you want to testify, you come up here. We put you under oath, and you can testify. [Me: Okay.] This is an opportunity to ask questions but not for you to testify. And you can certainly ask him if such and such is true or not true. Uhm, but you ask questions. You don't make statements. Okay? And I'll let you know if you're not following what I'm talking about.

Mr. [Socrates]: I'll try my best, and I'm willing to testify. [JJ: Okay.] Uhm, I just took notes from listening to that. So uhm, I guess I should get to the, Brett Kimberlin just said that I wrote that Jews [JJ: You ask him.] Oh. Okay. [JJ: Mr. Kimberlin, is true such and such] Okay, I know he doesn't like me, and I'm sorry. You said that, Mr. Kimberlin, you say that I wrote that Jews are the scourge of the Earth. Do you have proof of that, or is that potentially slander? [BK: uh]

JJ: At this point, we're talking about damages. Okay, so there's a default judgement entered against you on the claims before the court primary (interrupted)

Mr. [Socrates]: Okay. Okay.

JJ: Wait a second. The crux of which is defamation. The only reason we're here now is to assess what damages, if any, should be awarded because of that defamation. [Me: Okay.]

Mr. [Socrates]: Uhm, and I can get, is there a tape recording of this? [JJ: Uh-huh.] Okay. Okay. I understand.

JJ: Okay. I know you're not an attorney. Just if you have questions (interrupted)

Mr. [Socrates]: No, I understand, and if uhm, my concerns are, my concerns are for another venue. I'll leave it at that.

JJ: Alright. Just ask him questions, if you have any questions.

Mr. [Socrates]: Uhm, were you convicted of setting bombs? [BK: Objection. JJ: Overruled.]

BK: Yes, I was convicted.
Mr. [Socrates]: Uhm, What did you supply to this court in terms of your criminal background history?
BK: Nothing.
Mr. [Socrates]: You didn't mention drug dealing?
JJ: Is that a question?
Me: I don't know if it's pertinent or not. I would just like to (stumbling a bit ugh). I'm trying to establish that (interrupted).
BK: He's trying to establish that 32 years ago I was convicted of something? [Me: What (interrupted).] 32 years ago?
Me: Well, what I'm trying to ask is what did, is there anything I posted that hadn't been posted before in main stream media? And what would that have included? Such as that you were a murder suspect in the death of Julia Scyphers.
JJ: Is that a question, whether there were prior posting of allegations? Is that your question?
Me: Is there anything, Yes.
BK: That's never been posted before to my knowledge.
Me: It wasn't written about by Mark Singer of the New Yorker?
BK: Never heard of that.
Me: You never heard of Mark Singer?
BK: I said I never heard that.
Me: You never, you never knew that you were a [BK: I was not] You're saying you weren't a suspect in the murder of Julia Scyphers?
BK: I was never a suspect, no.
Me: You were never a suspect? [JJ: What he said.]
Me: Uhm, (I think I did a wtf or wow just wow whisper sigh) You contend that, that I damaged, some of the reasons that I damaged your revenue stream for your non-profits was because I called you a bomber, for example?
BK: that's true.
Me: Were you convicted of setting bombs, and has that been highlighted by main stream media?
BK: It was reported 32 years ago.
Me: Are you a private individual or a public figure?
BK: A private individual.
Me: Have you posted videos of yourself as a musician? Did you, have you been on radio talk shows, the LA Steel Show?
BK: Have I appeared on radio shows?
Me: How many radio shows have you appeared on would you estimate?
BK: Very few.
Me: Very few. But you have been on them?
BK: Yes.
Me: And uh, how many videos have you put together with colleagues such as Cliff Arnebeck, Brad Friedman perhaps, that you have posted on youtube on behalf of the Velvet Revolution?
BK: Hundreds.
Me: Did you or did you not waterboard yourself as a publicity stunt or for some type of, to make a political statement to the public on a controversial issue?
BK: I didn't waterboard myself.
Me: You didn't waterboard yourself? [BK: No.] What did I write to Lori Grace that was untrue or hadn't been published before by main stream media? I guess Mike Jesse of the Indy Star, I guess, on the Connell case. But uhm. [JJ: (starts to interject)] I'm sorry.
JJ: Your question is what did, what on the Lori Grace communication was not true?
Me: Yes.
BK: That I was a conman. That I was a fraudster.
Me: Have you ever been characterised as a conman by journalists such as Mark Singer?
BK: Not that I know of.
Me: Not that you know of. Uhm, let's see. I separated these documents by yellow sheets.
JJ: Why don't we mark your papers as exhibits. Are those extra copies?
(a bit of paperwork and whatnot)
Me: Why were you sent back to prison? Uhm. Alright, you are contending that my posting of things of information, you're contending that things that I have posted were false and malicious, false?
BK: We're not. I'm objecting. We're not getting into the case anymore. The default judgemant has been issued against him. [JJ: Okay.] We're on damages.
JJ: Well, a critical part of damages are issues of damage to reputation. So therefore, true statements are not compensable. Uh, so you certainly, the truth or falsity of a statement would be relevant to the court's consideration.
BK: What's the question again?
JJ: Your question was something about contending something was false?
Me: I'm sorry I lost my train of thought. I don't know if it's possible to.
JJ: You said something about what do you contend is false about what you said.
Me: Is there anything that I, uhm (interrupted)
BK: You've accused me of being a pedophile. You've accused me of being a fraudster and a conman.
Me: I would like to. Is there evidence that I called you a pedophile? I know we're not going back to the default being reversed, but (interrupted)
JJ: Just ask him. Where did he, where did you call him a pedophile?
BK: You posted that on your site.
Me: Where is the proof? (silence) How can I cause damage to your ventures by calling you a pedophile, if I didn't call you a pedophile?

to be continued.

Kimberlin Versus Socrates: The Thrilla In Vanilla November 14th, 2011 (Part 1)

2012-01-12T22:16:00.000-05:00

On November 14th, 2011 at 9:48 a.m., the court babe introduced case #339254-V.

For the record, Judge Jordan asked each of us to state we were present. Kimberlin said, "Yes, Sir." I had my game face on from the get-go and simply said, "Yes." I wasn't there to kiss Jordan's ass. I was there to win, baby.

The raison d'etre was simple. The case had fallen into default, and the point was to figure out damages. Brett Kimberlin was asking for $2.25 million. He was awarded a token $100 only because of the default judgement.

He received $99 too much, and that will become clear to ye after finishing this eight part series covering approximately two and a half hours of court stuff.

Kimberlin's Claims For Damages Statement

BK: Once Google [deleted his "offending, defamatory posts"], Mr. [Socrates] posted on his blog that people could find the offending posts by going to google cache. And that he had made copies of all the posts, and he planned on putting them up on a later date or putting them in some other fashion. He went on other websites and posted about donors, funders. I run two non-profit organisations here in town. One is called Justice Through Music.

We work with famous bands and artists and get young people involved with voting and social issues. Mr. [Socrates] contacted directly one of the funders of Justice Through Music via email and told her that I was a fraudster and a criminal and not to fund us any more. He's intentionally posted things on the blogs, he's said because he wants to kill my organisations.

Kimberlin did not supply any proof of that. He believed the default judgement was all that was needed to prove he should be awarded $2.25 million. Here is the email sent to Lori Grace provided by me for ye.

From: socrates [redacted email address]
Subject: Dear Lori Grace
To: [redacted email address]
Date: Monday, October 11, 2010, 3:36 AM

Dear Lori Grace, I am curious if you are aware of Brett Kimberlin's criminal past and propensity for making things up. The Michael Connell story is not true as Velvet Revolution has portrayed it. VR has never come up with one conviction for election fraud despite all the money it appears to have raked in. Would you mind telling me how much you have donated to Brett Kimberlin over the years through VR and any other organisations he has run? I can tell you're a very sweet lady, and I can't think of any other explanation than you've been conned out of money by Brett Kimberlin. Thanks for your time and consideration.
related link

Also, he's sent people threatening emails that he wants to murder me. So the punitive damages are I think warranted in this case. He won't stop....

In fact, he said that he intends to repost and post more. And he says that he has to get the truth out about me, that I'm a pedophile, that I'm a fraudster, that I'm a murderer, that I'm a bomber, that I'm a terrorist. That I'm all these terrible things.

I run two non-profits here in town. I have a wife. I have two kids.... I work with Congress members every single day of the week, and I have to deal with this crap. Where people go online every day and see Brett Kimberlin is a terrorist; Brett Kimberlin is a murderer; Brett Kimberilin is a pedophile; The punitive damages are incredible.

After the last court hearing here, I went over and got a peace order. The Judge ordered a peace order against him. And what does he do? He continues piling on. He doesn't stop....

And he says oh I'm insane. I've got problems. I'm mental. You know, all this. I'm autistic. I'm Asperger's. I'm, you know, whatever.

But that's not my problem. These are damages that I'm facing every single day. I've lost grants... from the Endowment from Democracy downtown because of this guy. ... from the State Department because of this guy...

[Judge Jordan interjects to look at Kimberlin's memo.]

A policeman enters the court room and sits behind me.

Socrates: Am I being arrested?
Judge Jordan: No.

....

Judge Jordan: Mr. Kimberlin, at this point in time we're on damages, It is your burden of proof to prove damages. So, I suspect that what you want to do is testify or do you have witnesses to testify about harm to... [Kimberlin interrupts]

BK: I have documents. I have witnesses. I mean, I don't have witnesses. I have myself...

Jordan: Okay. Why don't you come on to the witness stand, and we'll swear you in and hear what you have to say.

Kimberlin goes to the witness stand and is sworn in (to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth or face penalties of perjury).

Jordan: Mr Kimberlin, what would be helpful to the court in deciding damages would be to know what statements were made for which you are seeking damages; What the actual damages are to any loss of finances, damage to reputation, etc..

BK: There were four, I think, four counts in the complaint. Interference with business. Defamation. Harassment. Maybe stalking. So the judgement is in favour of all those.

Mr. [Socrates] has been on a three year campaign to destroy my business, my reputation, my partner's reputation. Brad Friedman is my partner, business partner out in California. And we have a non-profit we work on together.

And Mr. [Socrates] took it upon himself to decide that we were fraudsters and criminals and pedophiles and murderers. And my partner is Jewish, and he made a post that Jews are the scourge of the Earth. And that Jews should die in the ovens. And he has called me a pedophile a murderer, a fraudster, a con man, a terrorist. I mean the list goes on.

excerpts from ABSTRACT: A REPORTER AT LARGE- UNFINISHED BUSINESS
by Mark Singer October 7, 1996 link

Writer completed and published a story on the eve of the last Presidential election, in which Kimberlin was described as an unlikely American political prisoner. The writer stands by this story, but also goes more into depth about why Kimberlin was in prison in the first place, and what it was he did to get there...

He had been sentenced to serve 50 years and had served 15...

He signed a contract to write a book about Kimberlin's life. He agreed to cooperate, and in exchange he would receive a share of the book's royalties. This venture was predicated on the idea that there was a richer story to tell than the one I had previously told. Looking back, I think we both assumed that we had the same story in mind--an assumption that now strikes me as both conspiratorial and naive...

Tells about his career, beginning at 15, as a marijuana dealer...

Tells how he was implicated by police in the murder of Julia Scyphers; her granddaughter, then aged 9-12 accompanied Kimberlin alone on vacations...

Police theorized that Kimberlin had her murdered in order to stop her from blowing the whistle on his drug smuggling and relationship with her granddaughter...

Tells about a string of bombings which perplexed the Scyphers's area directly after the murder & which were later tied to Kimberlin...

Kimberlin meanwhile was arrested on a marijuana smuggling charge & later convicted of the bombing spree as well as attempting to forge the Great Seal of the President of the United States...

Tells about his time in prison as a model prisoner and a jailhouse lawyer...

Tells how Kimberlin fought the bombing case all the way to the Supreme Court...

Describes how Kimberlin claimed to have sold marijuana to Vice-Presidential candidate Dan Quayle while in prison...

Tells about the opinions of people writer spoke to who described Kimberlin as a psycho....

Writer started a new file called "megalomania," which included some of the things that he was picking up: that Kimberlin regarded the police as idiots; that, just before the Gulf War, be became convinced that his own interventions with the Iraqis could bring Saddam Hussein to his senses; that he grew irritated with Vincent Foster, Jr., when he committed suicide, because it might keep the Clinton Administration from focusing on his own case...

Tells about Kimberlin's attempt to become a pop icon...

Writer grew weary of Kimberlin's narcissism...

Tells about Kimberlin meeting Dan Quayle at a book signing...

Writer's original story was an account of an individual's civil rights abused by politicians and bureaucrats who were protecting their interests. I still stand by the essentials of that story. But the injustices it describes must stand alongside the history of injustices I kept discovering of law, of humanity, of life: injustices that dwarfed this little man's original complaints. And that story is true, too.

Jordan: What I need, though, right now you are giving me conclusions, and I need hard facts.

BK: You mean, as far as the- When you say hard facts, you mean? [Jordan interrupts]

Jordan: Yup, I mean, you're saying he said this, where are the statements we're talking...? [Kimberlin interrupts]

BK: [inaudible] are on his blog. These were the, I mean not just on his blog. But these were the statements that or the post that the Court ordered Mr. [Socrates] to remove from his blog which were already [inaudible] in August.

Jordan: What are the posts? I'm just hearing....

to be continued.

Is Brett Kimberlin Headed Back To Prison?

2012-01-10T17:15:00.000-05:00

artwork by Thusnelda

There were some amazing developments on January 9th in Rockville Maryland's Circuit Court concerning Kimberlin Versus Socrates case# 339254-V.

Speedway Bomber should have left well enough alone. The case should have ended on November 14th, 2011. Sure he embarrassed himself with his testimony that day. However, Judge Jordan let him off the hook with his rookie judging.

Apparently the new Judge didn't find any merit to Brett Kimberlin's claims that I should be held in contempt and imprisoned.

Judge Rupp the Magnificent has tons o'gravitas. I believe he's been on the bench since 1993. He's won prestigious awards, attended fine universities, taught law. He's got other things on his fine resume, but it is not the purpose of this entry to socratise Judge Rupp.

One look at the man displays this dude reeks of integrity.

I woke up around eight a.m. and made coffee. The hearing was scheduled for a half hour starting at Ten. After a few attempts, I finally reached the gentle voice of Judge Rupp's secretary, the lovely Ms. Joyce Thrift. We chit-chatted towards a mutual understanding of the situation. She informed the Judge of my request to appear telephonically. I asked if my motions were going to be addressed. She said they weren't in the file.

I was never called back. My inside source informed me that the motion for contempt wasn't taken seriously. I wasn't there, so I can't vouch for that. I do believe that's true. Apparently Judge Rupp listened to each piece of allegation by Kimberlin. Then to paraphrase, Judge Rupp continually responded, "Nope, next," until it became clear to Brett Kimberlin his latest jailhouse lawyer activity had added up to yet another EPIC FAIL.

http://surfwithberserk.com/epic-fails-ever

Later on in the day, I figured what the heck. Let's check out if the Montgomer County Circuit Court's case record had been updated. I saw the following. Emphasis mine.

Docket Date: 01/09/2012 Docket Number: 116
Docket Description: MOTION, DISMISS
Docket Type: Motion Filed By: Defendant Status: Open
Docket Text: DEFENDANT, [SOCRATES'] MOTION TO DISMISS CASE #339254V AND REPORT BRETT KIMBERLIN TO PROPER AUTHORITIES FOR COMMITING PERJURY TO THIS COURT, FILED. (LP)

Docket Date: 01/09/2012 Docket Number: 117
Docket Description: MOTION, APPROPRIATE RELIEF
Docket Type: Motion Filed By: Defendant Status: Open
Docket Text: DEFENDANT, [SOCRATES'] MOTION TO ALLOW DEFENDANT TO TESTIFY TELEPHONICALLY AT THE 01/09/2012 HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10:00 A.M. FILED. (LP)

Docket Date: 01/09/2012 Docket Number: 118
Docket Description: MOTION, APPROPRIATE RELIEF
Docket Type: Motion Filed By: Defendant Status: Open
Docket Text: DEFENDANT, [SOCRATES'] MOTION TO REVERSE DEFAULT JUDGMENT, DISMISS CASE AS FRIVOLOUS AND AWARD DEFENDANT [SOCRATES'] $100,000.00 OR ANY OTHER AMOUNT THIS COURT DEEMS APPROPRIATE, FILED. (LP)

Docket Date: 01/09/2012 Docket Number: 119
Docket Description: MOTION, APPROPRIATE RELIEF
Docket Type: Motion Filed By: Defendant Status: Open
Docket Text: DEFENDANT, [SOCRATES'] MOTION TO DECLARE BRETT KIMBERLIN AS A PUBLIC FIGURE RATHER THAN PRIVATE CITIZEN, FILED. (LP)

There you have it. Also left open was Kimberlin's motion to render Aaron Worthing's motion as moot. Hmmmm. Methinks the tables have finally turned. The Plaintiff has now become the Defendant and vice-versa. What a country!!!!

For those who missed out on reading my full motions, they can be found here:

Motions Filed Against Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin

Aaron Worthing is my hero. What he has done for me was a pure reflection of his intregity. He may say he fought back in order to protect his own anonymity, but in fact, he went far and beyond the call of duty for that objective. He saw I was experiencing an injustice, and he figured out a creative way to get me some legal representation within the actual trial.

Brett Kimberlin must have been shocked to find out Aaron Worthing has a splendid law degree and was able to procure pro-bono representation from a progressive, Washington D.C. law firm. Kimberlin thought a new motion to render Aaron's schtick moot would succeed. Nopesies. That was yet another fail for the convicted bomber, drug smuggler, perjurer, and murder suspect in the cold-blooded assassination of grandmother Julia Scyphers.

One of my motions makes reference to the two hundred or so paged document Mr. Worthing presented to the Court. In short, Aaron Worthing's motion is still relevant!

Docket Date: 01/06/2012 Docket Number: 114
Docket Description: MOTION, WITHDRAW (CASE NOT CLOSED)
Docket Type: Motion Filed By: Plaintiff Status: Open
Docket Text: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND SUBPOENAS TO COMCAST AND GOOGLE SEEKING IDENTITY OF AARON WORTHING, FILED. (LP)

Aaron has been spot on speaking of a Streisand Effect in regards to Brett Kimberlin. The more Bwett has attempted to terrorise his vocal opponents into silence, the more the truth has emerged.

When the dust settles, next on the socratisation docket will be the November 14th court audio and Brad Friedman of BradBlog. Brad has been part and parcel of Velvet Revolution's dissemination of convolution since late 2004. He has been the public face of all their manufactured nonsense.

I have made it a mission that Brett Kimberlin will not be the only one to take the fall for VR's transgressions against the truth in pursuit of donations. Brad Friedman is not gonna get away it. This has not been all about Brett Kimberlin. Not by a long shot.

Will all or any of my motions succeed? I don't know. I hope they do. I think Brett Kimberlin should return to prison. I believe he should be given psychiatric care for his delusions.

The problem with the internet is this. Those with no money and power who speak truth to fake left blogs have no choice but to first retreat to the mountains and regroup, before any counterattack is possible.

I picked blogger, because it is a google production. They take care of their bloggers in regards to search results. I was making a definite impact despite being bounced off of Democratic Underground and Daily Kos. I had become a player as Prepostericity, and as socrates at this blog I have attained modest success.

I believe Kimberlin went after me precisely to have my work here deleted. I believe this recent contempt schtick has been more of the same. I scooped this story. That probably sounds conceited, but it's the truth. If I am censored, the story remains hidden. Brad and Brett thus would get a free ride, as if they never had been bombarding the net with convolution in pursuit of those hefty donations.

The problem is this. There are bad guys in this world, so bad that even when you beat them at their own game, they cannot accept it. They then resort to cheating. I exposed Brett and Brad so thoroughly, that Brett decided to sue me, get twenty one blog entries deleted, and ultimately have me sent to prison. Wouldn't it be ironic, if he's the one sent to the clink? I have a clean record. I've never been a multiple felon. I would never hurt anyone.

There is something profound and beautiful about the U.S. Constitution. Brett Kimberlin is learning the hard way, that he does not have the right to harass innocent people nor manipulate courts and public opinion for his own personal benefit without a backlash.

Now we will segue to briefly discuss a personality with similarities to internet predator Neal Rauhauser. That man's name is Ron Brynaert. Ron has been cybersmearing me for quite a while now. He has called me a supertroll. He's written lies about me in order to buffer the true nature of Kimberlin's activities.

He portrays himself as an internet journalist. He truly is a smear merchant. Whether he's paid to do so or has mental issues, I'm not sure. My opinion is that he's a historic paid fake. Though I admit that's near impossible to prove. What cannot be denied is that he publishes mostly trash. He gets a lot of his bullshite done via twitter.

Ron's been all over my back for many months. The day or two leading up to Monday's hearing, he really picked it up with slamming me.

Brynaert claims he's always willing to retract or apologise for getting things wrong. However, as of this moment, he has yet to tweet on the big turnaround in this civil case. His role has been one of running interference for Brett Kimberlin. One of Ron's current schticks has been there is no hard evidence Speedy perjured himself. That's the ticket.

Ron could have easily obtained a copy of the November 14th audio, if he truly wanted to get to the bottom of whether I was a civilian Perry Mason or not. Someday soon I will be able to blog extensively on what took place that fateful day. I am still awaiting a copy. Then I will have to painstakingly go through it with a blog comb and compile transcript excerpts. I'll also have to crank out some narrative to go with it. Thank you for your patience.

Below are a bunch of screenshots Ron tweeted from right before the hearing. After each one, a comment or five has been added.

My thanks go out to many. Patterico- Thanks for getting me to wake up. Liberty Chick- Ok, you ratted me out. That was a pure dirtbag move. Though thanks for putting together the legal brief that helped me dominate the November 14th hearing. I do wish you'd come clean and give me credit for having scooped this story two years before you ever got a whiff.

Aaron Worthing- You know what you did for me, and it had less to do with self-preservation than with your dignity. You witnessed a fellow American having his civil rights violated and did something about it. Bravissimo!!!

Donkeytale- We've had some rough times, but through it all we have emerged as life-long friends. You were the first to notice that I was the source of this story, that I should be the one atop the zeitgeist not the others. I may not be there yet, but knock on wood we will get there. Even if my motions fail, thank you for your support.

The worst is over. I can hold my chin up and never again fall into any rut.

Popehat and Goatsred- Thanks, dudes. Elizabeth Kingsley- Thanks for taking on Aaron's situation pro bono. It takes a village to ensure justice. Dustin- Thanks. You're the best blogger friend I've made from Team Patterico, no doubt. Your passion for and contributions to this story have not gone unnoticed.

The Last Name Left- Thanks for all your hard work, when we partnered to expose BradBlog for being the rag it is. Hmmm. I hope I didn't forget anyone. Oh, one more. Thanks go out to my muse friend Thusnelda, who fundamentally altered my life for the better on November 17th. She taught me the ultimate gift, of what it means to understand one's true self and be at peace with the world.

Ron Brynaert's Bleatifications

Ron does seem to come from some form of sheep genus following the leads of Brett Kimberlin and Neal Rauhauser in attempts to destroy my name and feelings of self-worth. I am very proud of what I've accomplished as a blogger. The bad guys came close to shattering me into a million pieces. Very close. But ultimately I found a way to keep it together, even during my darkest hours being illegally detained in a Maryland prison.

I don't advise anyone to waste their time on him, Rauhauser, or any of the other junk that has been posted cybersmearing me. But I can't stop anyone from looking. I try not to look too much, for it can sometimes cause me deep pain. Until one has had experienced this type of thing, one can only imagine the sheer horror of it.

The following are tweets from Brynaert leading up to yesterday's hearing. May he find a way to cleanse his soul. It's not healthy to be such a rotten person with no moral base.

internet fatfokkkface fake journalist psycho breath

It's called spooking them out. Of course with Ron's spin, there's never a reason to question the hysteria generated against Andrew Breitbart. To Ron, it's all about misdirection.

The Team Numbnuts schtick consists of blogging terrorism, period. They are cheaters. So the meme has become no way were there any swattings. Hey, my name is Ron Brynaert. Listen to me! I'd be up for the Pulitzer Prize, if hack Jen Preston of the NY Times hadn't stolen my Weinergate schtick. I never lie. I ooze integrity.

That's the ticket. Ron's a creep who has never given a coherent reason why he's been trying to destroy my spirit. He's as creepy as it gets. He's no different than Rauhauser. Creepy is as creepy does.

Why does Ron continue to evoke authority? Anyone can fact check his schtick and see that he is the so-called supertroll. I've been menacing Brett Kimberlin? There's no proof Kimberlin perjured himself on November 14th? Where's Ron's fricken update on how yesterday went? He might have pulled the wool over donkeytale's eyes, but that's a whole other can of blog tunafish. It would also be quite dull, so we won't go there.

Ron's schtick is basically schtick theft of my schtick. From 2008-2010, I was in the top five of all MLT statistics. (MLT stands for Major League Trollbusting and is jointly owned by Meta Magazine and ESPN.)

Larisa Alexandrovna was a malicious whench I totally pwned. Brynaert is soooo full of lies. He's never been a trollbuster. He's been fricken in bed with the people I exposed. He is what's referred to as a concern troll. He's never explained how I'm the supertroll of the century. Has Ron never heard it's the reader who decides?

He wrote last week that I haven't had it that bad getting trolled on. In the above tweet, he's trying to make it seem he is fair and balanced. He's been nowhere to be found on anything all these years for internet Meta. But now we're supposed to believe he is some sort of sincere expert on it, and that I am some multipersonality troll into playing mind games? He's fricken allowed people who have criminally cybersmeared me to post on his blog. Yet Brett Kimberlin is the one being menaced, not me?

This creep actually went to the trouble of writing a whole entry shedding doubt on Brett Kimberlin having set the Speedway, Indiana bombs. WTF??? He's been blabbering for weeks about the Monday hearing, how I was in such big trouble, while Kimberlin was not. So where is Mr. Fair and Balanced with an update? He's ignoring the huge turnaround, because he's a lying sack of disinfo shite.

Like right there. Where's his proof? Brett Kimberlin pulled the same nonsense in court, yet due to my possessing civilian Perry Mason skills, I got Madman to concede that all we needed to discuss were my socrates and Prepostericity usernames. Yet, Ron continues to spew the above as if it were fact. Ron Brynaert is a scumbag. Talk about the personification of scum. That's what he is.

BradBlog isn't purposely spewing disinfo garbage? Combine my findings with the hard financial data Liberty Chick came up with, and of course BradBlog has been purposely generating disinformation.

I'm either gonna repost the remaining 18 deleted entries, or I'm gonna rewrite them. Brad Friedman is not gonna get away with running scams since late 2004.

And sincerely look at how dirtbag Ron Brynaert refers to the so-called menacing of Brett Kimberlin. Who the fock does he think he's fooling? I'm the one at the top of the zeitgeist. Ron Brynaert is the internet sewer rat, not me. Ron has cemented the fact that he will be forever associated with internet predators such as Neal Rauhauser.

It's that kind of post that leads me to believe scumbag Ron Brynaert is paid to post. Why is he trying to create the image of Brad and Brett not being part and parcel of one another? Look again at who Brett is wearing on his T-shirt.

BradBlog did not give birth to me. I have two Master's degrees. Due to circumstances, I became the right man at the right time to whistleblow on internet convolution. My plan is to in the future have pictures taken and out myself in entirety. I'm a real and decent human being who hasn't deserved the kind of cybersmearing by Ron Brynaert and others that continues to this day.

HA! Now that Kimberlin has become the "Defendant" and myself the "Plaintiff," Ronny Boy has decided to stifle his yapper. Who the fock does he think he's fooling????

Hmmm. That was actually a good tweet by Rona Bryntart. Why isn't he like that more often? Nonetheless, he still failed to provide one shred of an explanation explaining his point. Or are we supposed to buy jis angle that Brad Friedman is a coward?

The truth is Brad Friedman has consistently been masking his part and parcel association with serial fabulist Brett Kimberlin. If anyone gave birth, it was the Speedway Bomber to Brad Friedman, who had been a total nothing until supplied with crazy hoaxes centered around black box voting.

Ok, that was more Ron Brynaert as concern troll. What he doesn't want folks to realise are all the incestuous relationships. That's his fricken internet family.

Like Larisa, he tries to make it seem like there has been no affiliation between Brett and Raw Story. I proved there has been such a tie. Yet, Ron continues to assert I'm the supertroll, while he's the intrepid reporter. No, Ron. What you are is an intrepid numbnut.

Oh yes, anything bad that has happened to me was my own fault. That makes perfect sense. NOT!

So according to Team Numbnut player Ron Brynaert, not only am I a supertroll, I am also a hoaxer. Why is Ron Brynaert all over my ass and protecting a convicted terrorist and con artist? Why is Brett being menaced, but I am getting what I deserve? FU Ron Brynaert and your gutter soul.

How was calling Judge Jordan out for being incompetent contempt of court? How was Kimberlin committing perjury somehow not proven? Why would anyone waste their time reading anything by Ron Brynaert?

Aaaah. I have now risen to historic troll greatness according to Brynaert's gutter writings. Does he have no shame? If he had been born into a different time and country, he might have been a Good German.

Ron Brynaert is a cretin. He's creepy. If he's nuts, I hope he can get mental health treatment. I, for one, believe he is paid to post crap on the internet. It's called astroturfing. He can concern troll all he wants, but I've a suspicion he and Neal Rauhauser are on the same team.

The Roots of Leftier Than Thouism

2012-01-06T20:17:00.001-05:00

George Harrison- Give Me Love (Give Me Peace On Earth)

Many have wondered how I became such a groovy, free-spirited peacenik. Until recently, I was incapable of providing an answer. On November 17th, 2011 a friend channeling the High Goddess revealed all. I am an idealist dreamer.

General estimates place the percentage of INFP's at 1-2% of the population. Others claim the number is closer to 5%. Either way, there are not that many of us. First things first. What is an INFP?

Noted intellectual Carl Jung devised a theory on personality. He came up with a formula which later transformed into classifying each of us into one of sixteen categories.

Now before anyone starts moaning this sounds like Cookie Cutting 101, I beg to disagree. One should hold back such preconceived notions, until one has thoroughly looked into personality theory.

I, for one, believe Jung was a genius who came up with something spectacular. While astrology seemingly makes a lot of sense on many levels, imho, the science of the cosmos is nowhere near as relevant compared to Jung's personality theory. The latter is much more effective in providing a personal key for one to unlock her or his own inner nature.

Personality theory is broken down into sixteen groupings based on permutations of four different one or the other traits we each possess. I'm an INFP. That acronym spelled out is "Introverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving."

The opposite of that would be ESTJ or "Extraverted Sensing Thinking Judging."

For those who want to find out what group they are in go to this link and TAKE IT NOW! Scroll down and click on "Basic Personality Type Test." Afterward, you can check out this page for further info.

To be a true leftier than thou, one needn't be an introvert. ENFPs also possess the personality trait consisting of idealism. We are the only two which do. Putting extraverts to the side, I decided to isolate variables intuitive (N), feeling (F), and perceiving(P) in order to understand what makes an INFP an idealist or say utopian. Here are my findings:

INFJ: similar but anal retentive.

INTP: similar but inaccessible know-it-alls.

ISFP: similar but lack the abilty to reflect and take action.

In short, my child-like curiosity got me wondering why INFPs and ENFPs are the only two of the sixteen who possess an ability to sincerely care about saving the planet. It's not that I belittle those from the other fourteen personality groups who are essentially posing when displaying such sentiments. I do want them to keep on keeping on being wonderful and delightful for the benefit of humanity.

My conclusion is that not one of the three variables can be touted as the main reason why INFPs possess such incredible warmth and soul. It appears that all three traits work symbiotically to instill in idealist dreamers that which makes us soooo much more adorable in profound ways to the rest of ye.

From the second link above, here is a little bit describing INFPs:

Quiet, reflective, and idealistic. Interested in serving humanity. Well-developed value system, which they strive to live in accordance with. Extremely loyal. Adaptable and laid-back unless a strongly-held value is threatened. Usually talented writers. Mentally quick, and able to see possibilities. Interested in understanding and helping people.

Click here for a detailed description of INFP.

And here are some famous INFPs:

Aldous Huxley, author

Audrey Hepburn, actress

Princess Diana, Princess of Wales

Helen Keller, activist and author

William Shakespeare

Motions Filed Against Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin

2011-12-31T07:16:00.000-05:00

http://assets0.indy.com/photos/410491/default.jpg

Montgomery County Circuit Court
Case # 339254-V

Brett Kimberlin Vs. Prepostericity, socrates, DFQ2

Certificate of Service

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day December 31, 2011 a copy of the documents entitled

1) MOTION TO DISMISS CASE #339254-V AND REPORT BRETT KIMBERLIN TO PROPER AUTHORITIES FOR COMMITTING PERJURY TO THIS COURT

2) MOTION TO ALLOW DEFENDANT TO TESTIFY TELEPHONICALLY AT THE 01/09/2012 HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10:00 A.M.

3) MOTION TO DISMISS ALL NEW KIMBERLIN CLAIMS BASED ON MY NEVER BEING LEGALLY SERVED FOR THIS HEARING

4) MOTION TO REVERSE DEFAULT JUDGEMENT, DISMISS CASE AS FRIVOLOUS, AND AWARD DEFENDANT [ME] $100,000 OR ANY AMOUNT THIS COURT DEEMS APPROPRIATE.

5) MOTION TO DECLARE BRETT KIMBERLIN AS A PUBLIC FIGURE RATHER THAN PRIVATE CITIZEN

were mailed, postage prepaid (3 day receipt U.S. Postal Service) to:

Brett Kimberlin (aka The Speedway Bomber)
[redacted]
Cabin John, Maryland 20818

December 31, 2011 ....... X
Date ....................... Signature

__________________________________________

Mr. [Me] B.A., M.A., M.Ed
[redacted address]

concerning: case # 339254-V
Speedway Bomber Vs. Mr. Wonderful (yet humble leftier than thou)

MOTION TO DISMISS CASE #339254-V AND REPORT BRETT KIMBERLIN TO PROPER AUTHORITIES FOR COMMITTING PERJURY TO THIS COURT

Brett Kimberlin's hands are not clean. On November 14th, he committed perjury. Since he has consistently lied to this court, anything he offers cannot be taken at face value as factual.

The November court audio is proof that Brett Kimberlin has provided no evidence I defamed him through blogging, cyberstalked him, or interfered with his business. He was awarded a token $100 by Judge Jordan based solely on the fact that this case entered into default. Brett Kimberlin was asked repeatedly by Judge Jordan and the Defendant for even a scintilla of proof for damages claimed to totalling $2.25 million.

Here's one example which displayed the degree of nonsense this jailhouse attorney was proffering as evidence for my liability:

Brett Kimberlin, a.k.a. the Speedway Bomber, testified under oath that I had said, to paraphrase, Jews are the scourge of the Earth. I asked for evidence. None was provided, because I would never say such a thing. In fact, I informed Judge Jordan I am Jewish.

Brett Kimberlin Committed Perjury

I would need extra time to fully document the vast number of lies Brett Kimberlin has provided this court. I will stick to three. While it is rare for someone to be charged with perjury in a civil case, I humbly ask this court to consider that Brett Kimberlin's outrageous lies directly pertained to the core of his frivolous lawsuit. The following three examples are from the November 14th hearing.

1) Mr. Kimberlin has argued that part of my alleged defamation has had to do with my blogging on his criminal past, most specifically with his having been convicted of domestic terrorism. For proof that he perjured himself on November 14th, see Kimberlin v. White, 7 F.3d 527, 528-29 (6th Cir. 1993), Kimberlin v. DeLong, 637 N.E.2d 121 (Ind., 1994), and Kimberlin v. DeWalt, 12 F.Supp.2d 487 (D. Md., 1998). The question I asked below is 100% the truth! And Brett Kimberlin had the nerve to unequivocally lie to this court.

Me: Were you released and then sent back to prison for a parole violation, for failure to pay compensation to the, Mrs. DeLong, the wife of Carl DeLong, who took his own life after those bombs tore off half his body?

Speedway Bomber: No, I wasn’t.

2) The Plaintiff also lied on November 14th when he claimed he was never a suspect in the murder of Julia Scyphers.

Me: You’re saying you weren’t a suspect in the murder of Julia Scyphers?

Speedway Bomber: I was never a suspect, no.

The following excerpt from respected journalist Mark Singer's book, Citizen K: The Deeply Weird American Journey of Brett Kimberlin (1996), page 98, clearly shows that Brett Kimberlin was well aware he was a prime suspect in that murder investigation.

Early that afternoon, [Brett] Kimberlin went downtown to meet with Forrest Bowman. Along the way, he said, he passed a newspaper vending machine and saw the Indianapolis News's proclamation BOMBING SUSPECT IS LINKED TO MURDER.

"I saw this headline about the bombing investigation and I bought a newspaper and started reading it," he told me [reporter Mark Singer]. "I think: Oh, this might be interesting. And then I read the first couple of paragraphs--about a Broad Ripple business man--and I realize they're talking about me and I'm just floored."

From StarFiles: The Speedway Bombings, Part 2, The Indianapolis Star, October 6, 2010:

When police began looking for a motive in the Scyphers slaying, they found there'd been a recent family clash. Julia Scyphers' daughter, Sandra Barton, had become involved with a man who seemed to Mrs. Scyphers to be inordinately close to one of Barton's young daughters. Mrs. Scyphers told friends she was so concerned that she'd arranged for both of her granddaughters to come live with her. Whether or not Mrs. Scyphers' fears were correct (no charges were ever filed to that effect), this incident led investigators to start looking at Brett C. Kimberlin.

I humbly ask this court to look closely at MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS OF GOOGLE.COM AND COMCAST AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL GOOGLE.COM AND/OR ITS SUBSIDIARY BLOGGER.COM TO DISCLOSE THE IDENTITY AND ADDRESS OF BLOGGER WHO USES THE PSEUDONYM AARON WORTHING. Mr. Worthing is a Washington attorney who has been dragged into this case through other Kimberlin lies. He is exponentially more qualified than myself for conducting himself in litigation processes and has covered these three instances of Brett Kimberlin deliberately making claims that are untrue. Kimberlin may have pulled the wool over Judge Jordan's eyes, but I am hopeful the new Judge in this reopened case will take a close look at exactly what Mr. Kimberlin has been up to.

3) Kimberlin claimed on November 14th to this very court that he was exonerated for the Speedway, Indiana bombings.

Me: You deny setting the bombs that you were convicted of?

Speedway Bomber: Absolutely. Absolutely.

Me: And you admit you weren’t exonerated?

Speedy: Judge, Mr. [Me] –

Judge: Just answer the question, because--

Speedy: Mr. [Me] is trying to get into a, a lawsuit that was filed against the Department of Justice. It was settled under a confidentiality agreement, and I, I’m not gonna discuss it. And I’m going to object.

Judge: What was your question? Whether he contended he was a political prisoner?

Me: Um, well I don’t know how I can speak without getting into me testifying.

Judge: OK.

Me: But there is something that I wanted to, that I’m trying to get at. I, I, would like to do just a few examples. I don’t want to overburden –

Judge: Sounds like you’re asking him about a case that is subject to a confidentiality agreement. And so why don’t you move on to something else?

While Judge Jordan was mystifying in how he took Kimberlin's outrageous claim at face value, the following testimony by Brett Kimberlin clearly showed he has been misleading this court. Or perhaps he can provide proof in Judge's chamber he was exonerated for the Speedway bombings, yet due to an agreement, he can't discuss the details. Maybe Mr. Kimberlin also knows where we can purchase some swampland.

Speedy: And he talks about, you know, I haven’t been exonerated, well he doesn’t know what happened with the Justice Department lawsuit. He doesn’t know. And, but he goes out and says “I know that he’s never been exonerated” and all this stuff. Well, I’m not getting into that here. You know? But I can tell you for a fact and everybody here, I’m not on parole. I had a 50-year sentence. I’m no longer serving that sentence. So something happened. And that’s as far as I’m going to go with that.

This case closed on November 14th. I was ready to accept its conclusion. Now that serial fabulist Brett Kimberlin has reopened it and furthermore is attempting to have me imprisoned, I say enough is enough!

Since Brett Kimberlin has lied to this court pertaining to this case, I ask that this frivolous action be ended once and for all in regards to myself. I have not lied to this court. My biggest sin was not showing up on time to prevent a default judgement. I humbly request this court dismiss the injunction made by Judge Jordan after the November 14th hearing. I also request in light of Mr. Kimberlin's perpetual prevaricating, that the judgement of $100 be reduced to $1, and that paying Kimberlin's court costs be dismissed as a legal obligation on my part.

I further request, due to Kimberlin's lack of proving any damages on November 14th, that I be allowed to repost blog entries the court had previously ordered deleted due to the default judgement. I have never defamed, cyberstalked, nor interfered with Mr. Kimberlin's business. That Judge Jordan awarded him a token $100 instead of $2.25 million speaks volumes as to the validity of this lawsuit. I deeply apologise for having let this case fall into default. That was my one and only sin. Thank you for your time and consideration.

http://assets0.indy.com/photos/410489/default.jpg

MOTION TO ALLOW DEFENDANT TO TESTIFY TELEPHONICALLY AT THE 01/09/2012 HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10:00 A.M.

I cannot afford to make it to this next hearing. In fact, due to being poor, that is why I was unable to stop this case from falling into default.

I humbly ask this court to allow me to telephonically represent myself at the next hearing. Thanks for your time and consideration.

MOTION TO DISMISS ALL NEW KIMBERLIN CLAIMS BASED ON MY NEVER BEING LEGALLY SERVED FOR THIS HEARING

According to docket #103 dated 12/09/2011, "COPY OF ORDER ISSUED FOR PERSONAL SERVICE TO BE SERVED UPON [Me] ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 20, 2011 AND MAILED TO PLAINTIFF."

I only know of this hearing due to word of mouth. I was never served any papers on or before December 20, 2011. Thanks for your time and consideration.

MOTION TO REVERSE DEFAULT JUDGEMENT, DISMISS CASE AS FRIVOLOUS, AND AWARD DEFENDANT [ME] $100,000 OR ANY AMOUNT THIS COURT DEEMS APPROPRIATE.

I am truly sorry this case fell into default. Nonetheless, there are a few extenuating circumstances which I humbly believe legally bound this court to reverse the default judgement.

The original service was in fact not legal.

.... (a) Service laws are profoundly different between Maryland and Massachusetts. In your state, a defendant has to be physically served or sign for the summons through accepting certified mail. Massachusetts allows for a constable or other such legally eligible person to merely affix the writ of summons to the outside of one's residence.

Fair enough. However, I wish to point out to this court that if you are going to base the legality of Kimberlin's original service on Massachusetts' law, you have no legal alternative than to reverse the default judgement.

The following is from number 4 for Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure:

Same: Form.
The summons shall bear the signature or facsimile signature of the clerk; be under the seal of the court; be in the name of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; bear teste of the first justice of the court to which it shall be returnable who is not a party....

In short, the writ of summons was not in the name of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Thus, I was never legally served according to Massachusetts' law.

.... (b) Furthermore, I sincerely believe your court is legally bound to quash the writ's legal standing due to both Maryland's High Court and the U.S. Constitution!

See http://library.findlaw.com/2000/Feb/1/129013.html
Maryland High Court Rejects Virginia Service of Process Rule On Maryland Residents

In that case, your High Court rejected Virginia's service of process and quashed a writ's legality. They ruled that Virginia's service law is unconstitutional and breaks the 14th amendment guaranteeing due process. Furthermore, the High Court found that Virginia had no vested interest in the referenced case.

Thus, the only way you can rule Kimberlin's service of writ of summons was legal is to deny me of my 14th Amendment rights simply due to my being from another state. The U.S. Constitution clearly states that all men [and women] are created equal.

Furthermore, Massachusetts clearly has no vested interest in these proceedings. As for the so-called murder threat, I was never asked by anyone in my state to appear in court. That's because there was never a death threat made against the Speedway Bomber and perjurer, Brett Coleman Kimberlin.

Brett Kimberlin was afforded a three hour hearing on November 14th in which to prove damages. Not only did he not do so, he made many false claims and outright perjured himself. The evidence is in the November 14th court audio.

Since it should now be clear to this court that indeed Brett Kimberlin has been lying to you, and that this case is in actuality frivolous, should the court reverse the default judgement, I humbly ask for an immediate dismissal of all parts of this case, that Brett Kimberlin be investigated for perjury, and that I be awarded $100,000 for pain and suffering caused by this unfortunate situation.

Brett Kimberlin is what is referred to as a jailhouse attorney. He has filed over 100 lawsuits. He does not have any law degrees.

Brett Kimberlin sued me because I wrote unpleasant truths about him. Since he was unable to prove one iota that I committed a tort, I humbly believe that this has been a bald-faced attempt by Mr. Kimberlin to terrorise me and to put a gag on my constitutional 1st amendment rights to freedom of speech and expression. I didn't libel, defame, cyberstalk, or interfere with any of his business. I beg from the bottom of my heart that this court weigh all the evidence and lack of such and rule as this motion has requested. Thanks for your time and consideration.

MOTION TO DECLARE BRETT KIMBERLIN AS A PUBLIC FIGURE RATHER THAN PRIVATE CITIZEN

I filed motions for the November 14th hearing. It doesn't appear that Judge Jordan ever ruled on the MOTION TO CLASSIFY BRETT KIMBERLIN AS A PUBLIC FIGURE. I clearly proved with supplied documention that Mr. Kimberlin is indeed a public figure. I needn't remind this court that the bar for proving defamation and libel against a public figure is much higher than for that against private citizens. Since Kimberlin has displayed a propensity for filing lawsuits, declaring him as a public figure could encourage him to think twice before ever again wasting a court's time while smearing a private citizen, merely because he doesn't want unpleasant truths about himself made known to the public. Thanks for your time and consideration.

Sadistic Cybersmearing and the Roots of Blogging Fascism

2011-12-20T18:13:00.001-05:00

internet predator Neal Rauhauser

It's the height of ignorance to believe fascism rose in the 30s and 40s because of a few evil men. According to Wilhelm Reich, it is the social-psychology of masses of people which forms the bedrock of totalitarianism. That is probably close to a word for word quote from him. I'm too lazy to check.

Except for newbies and fence-sitters, internet progressives have known for a long time that The Daily Kos and other so-called leftist outlets have been nothing other than bald-faced attempts at hijacking liberalism as a brand name.

In June 2011, sadistic blogger Neal Rauhauser penned Bringing Breitbart (And Thomas) To Justice (Action Alert!).

There he utilised the standard model for an internet hoax, one so many before have used. Jason Leopold was perhaps the most infamous for his Karl Rove indictment hoax. Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin, yellow rag journalist Brad Friedman, and another unhinged, self-proclaimed journalist named Larisa Alexandrovna wet themselves with what I have coined as the Michael Connell Threatened by Karl Rove hoax.

The internet is a lot like driving. When we first hit the road, we are like, "This is wicked awesome, dude." Yet as the years pass, we see enough traffic, aggressive driving, and flipped birds to say, "This sucks." It's the same with the internet. At first, we're like, "Yay, what a wondrous thing." Then soon enough we notice there is convolution to the yin-yang; And that it's not just at the obviously nutty places.

Most people whether on the right, left, or in the middle want us to be the best America we can be. Sure, at first it's kinda swell to read heated exchanges between libtards and repukelicans. Even some of those preaching to the choir threads can hit the spot. Yet, those are rare occurences. By their intrinsic nature, such dialogues can only go so far.

Personally, I believe the most trippy fun to be had with intercourse is when everyone is a good jake and actually treats others with respect. I'm old-school like that. Raised in academia, I was enthralled by a system in which we were expected to research, reflect, and share our schticks with other like-minded thinkers. The narrower the subject area, the easier it was to get places.

So there you have it. We have libtards, repukelicans, and the open-minded. Oopsies. There's another category. They were mentioned earlier in this diary. There is a form of internet cretin, who while promoting him or herself as an activist and God's gift to the blogosphere, is actually a self-promoting schemer. Such people tend to have much success at first due to cynically understanding how easy it is to prey on human nature.

Heck, I've fallen for it myself. I believed in Brad Friedman. I didn't consider that he might have been talking out of his ass concerning Clint Curtis with his assassinated dog, Dieb-Throat, and other nonsense he's been involved in since late 2004.

In the above DKos link, a few things immediately came to mind which are formulaic in its preaching to the choir mentality. For each DKos diary, the first post is a tip jar, where the masses declare a thumbs up or down for the entry. Here's how the voting went for Neal Rauhauser aka Stranded Wind.

At this point, we know DKos is rigged for moderating. But 577 to 0? The Harlem Globetrotters never did that well against the overmatched Washington Generals.

Now what I don't get is this. Why if Rauhauser had done such an effective job planting the Team Breitbart scam did he not realise that subtlety is our best friend? Clearly he now has no credibility left, not a shred. So why not simply plant the seed? Why did he go over the edge, continue smearing innocent people, and post so much garbage with zero proof?

Also take note of his so-called exhibits proving porn expert goatsred was the Goebbels of Weinergate to Andew Breitbart's Hitler.

Oh, hmmm.....

I counted six of those. Did any of the 577 numbnuts voting thumbs up for Neals "article" consider that they might have been fed a hoax? Obviously not. And we now know for sure how contrarian muckrakers end up at disinfo palaces such as Daily Kos and Democratic Underground. They receive the banhammer.

Anyone ever hear of Annette Appollo, Dave Weintraub, Francis Holland, or socrates/Prepostericity (me)?

(See Annette Appollo: Death by Internet.)

What I'd also like to know is whether there is proof that Neal Rauhauser and Brett Kimberlin work together. On the surface, this is apparently true. Indictbreitbart.org is yet another Velvet Revolution donation project. Rauhauser promoted that group in his above diary. The following was also apparently posted by Neal Rauhauser.

Hmmm. Was Neal telling the truth when he wrote that Kimberlin is his client? I don't know.

I was arrested. The prosecutor knew it was nonsense and told a judge nolle prosequi, which to paraphrase means, "Get this bullshite out of me kisser."

Brett Kimberlin is a notorious jailhouse attorney who has been bullying me with court proceedings for about a year. He "lost" his case on November 14th but will still not let it go. He is currently attempting to have me imprisoned for contempt of court.

Maryland Judge Ricky Boy Jordan ordered that I not defame nor interfere with the Speedway Bomber's business interests. There was never any permanent injunction made that I cannot legally blog on the case or anything else having to do with Brett Kimberlin or associates of his such as Brad Friedman of the BradBlog concerning provable dispensation of convolution.

I made a mistake. I admit it. I was frantically trying to get funds together to make a trip down to Maryland. I had been in a depressed cave for many months. During most of this last year, I no longer cared. I blogged much less than ever before and even went to youtube to carve a nice little niche with this movie channel.

I was one of the last to find out I had been getting my arse cybersmeared by Neal Rauhauser at Daily Kos. Patterico, an Asst. D.A. from Los Angeles, tried his best to wake me up from my dogmatic man cave slumber. I almost woke up in time to prevent a default judgement. But my car was on the shelf. Attorneys wanted 40-50 grand to represent. I tried to find pro bono help but failed.

During I believe sometime in August, not sure because I am no good at remembering dates, in the midst of plenty o'emails back and forth with Patterico, Liberty Chick, and one including Aaron Worthing, I slipped in a sentence based on frustration. I thought I had phrased it well enough for it not to be construed as a death threat. I said something like maybe I should [you know what] Kimberlin to get some justice. It was a bad joke. I didn't flesh it out enough. The point of the failed joke was supposed to be that spending years in prison for killing the deluded Speedway Bomber would not have been justice. I was simply frustrated at not having the funds to get that frivolous, insane lawsuit dismissed.

The lovely and talented Liberty Chick didn't know me well at the time and ratted me out. Somehow I wasn't mad at her for doing so. Nonetheless, I didn't like being arrested and treated like dirt for well over 24 hours by the Maryland criminal justice system. That's a whole other ball of wax.

I will add that Liberty Chick did a splendid job helping me come up with a defense for the damages hearing. That the judgement was only $100 for a $2.25 million claim kinda sorta tells who really won. Omg, people must check out the Nov. 14th audio. Yay!!!!! Lol, I wrote omg and yay in a blog post. p:>

On Sept. 14th, Fatf***face set it up so we would have a damages hearing for November 14th. I am still awaiting the audio from that final hearing. Kimberlin clearly slandered me. Not only that, I got him to commit perjury on cross-examination. Hence, this is why I have become the toast of the internet and hailed by many as a modern day, civilian Perry Mason. I would not be surprised if Speedy and/or Rauhauser are arrested for activities conducted in relation to myself.

Some jackass (Hmmm, I wonder who that could be?) illegally posted my driver's license picture and court audio from the Sept. 14th hearing. The bottom line is since I hadn't made any actual or even direct death threat, the Maryland criminal justice system had no right to arrest me. I wouldn't have been if not for actions undertaken by serial fabulist Brett Coleman Kimberlin.

The holding cell was stuffy. They threw about eight of us into one man cells. There were tons of other cells, but those were used by the fat pigs as offices. I was given no food and subjected to sleep deprivation for approximately 16 hours.

Oh my, Kimberlin is asking for trouble from Maryland authorities once they become aware of the racket he's been peddling concerning myself. On November 14th, he denied setting the bombs in Speedway Indiana and claimed exoneration, but that due to some agreement with authorities details cannot be discussed. That's what I think I heard. I want that audio to confirm!

Judge Jordan, the former ambulance chaser, didn't stop for one second and consider that Kimberlin had just perjured himself. Even at the end, Jordan was still kissing Kimberlin's ass despite a mountain of bullshit that had been exposed by myself as lies. This is why I called him FatF***Face without asterisks in the day or two after returning to Massachusetts once the damages hearing had concluded.

Since becoming aware of being an introvert on November 17th, I no longer am prone to such crass behaviour. Thus the asterisks are now in place. p:>

Anyway, once I get that audio I'm gonna write a lot more about that November 14th hearing. Bet on it. And if any of ye come across that driver's license picture, please be aware that I had no clue it would later be plastered on the net by sadistic thugs. Otherwise, I would have dolled myself up for the occasion.

Lately I have been thinking of coming out with my real name and photos. Then ye will know how cute and charming I actually am.

Ok, I guess I better wrap up this post. Before doing so, I would like to add a few links that Neal Rauhauser doesn't want people to see. He posted them on a website called Open Left. If one tries to access them now, they will run into an "oopsie this page doesn't exist anymore" schtick.

Thanks to the internet gods, we have the wayback machine.

Organized Intimidation? Ambush Time. by: StrandedWind Sun Aug 29, 2010

Social Media's Neighborhood Watch by: StrandedWind Tue Aug 31, 2010

Here's the main reason Neal's dumbass hoax fell apart. If he had written less and quit while he was ahead, it wouldn't have been so easy to figure out there is no actual Team Breitbart. As a pure leftier than thou, I did not fit so easily into his script.

I was posting on Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin and Brad Friedman of BradBlog well before Liberty Chick and Patterico heard of their part and parcel connection to internet convolution. A year ago around approximately October, Liberty Chick came up with her fantastic piece on Velvet Revolution. She had basically stumbled onto the story. While researching a band, she came across Kimberlin's Justice Through Music. With a bit of web surfing, she was all of a sudden asking wtf.

Patterico teased her story. I emailed him. Months passed, blah, blahg, blogger, now we are in the present. And ain't payback a bitch?

Was Neal Rauhauser the notorious Dan Wolfe persona who helped bring down Anthony Weiner? I wouldn't bet against it. Cui bono? Who published two now scrubbed diaries at Open Left admitting to being into those kinds of cybersmearing endeavours?

Yet unlike internet predator Neal Rauhauser, I don't transform opinion or in his case lies into proven facts. There are two specific dumbf*** fat faces who need to immediately stfu and stop harassing innocent Americans, or the chickens (authorities) are gonna come home to roost on their soiled, sadistic, and deluded spirits.

Patterico's Pontweetifications

2011-12-10T08:56:00.000-05:00

Was Team Numbnuts Behind the Fake Verizon Schtick?

2011-12-08T20:34:00.001-05:00

composite sketch of Team Numbnuts' leader allegedly spotted in Argentina

So out comes a Huffington Post article by Ryan Grim titled, Eric Boehlert Targeted In Bungled 'Verizon' Sting.

Here's the money quote. Emphasis mine.

But O'Keefe is not the only one who might want to embarrass Boehlert. [Boehlert] regularly tussles with conservatives online, particularly commentator Andrew Breitbart. In the days before the attempted prank, activists suggested targeting Boehlert on Twitter.

"#ows, @EricBoehlert is cashing 6-figure checks to support you. When u r run out of Zuccotti park, beers and brats at his place in NJ," tweeted @Flynn1776. That handle belongs to Mike Flynn, an editor at Breitbart's BigGovernment.com, which was the first to publish O'Keefe's ACORN sting.

He later added, "Wait, let's have an #occupy @EricBoehlert party. He's paid by the 1% after all. I'll send in the clowns. Redundant, yes, but it will be fun!"

Mandy Nagy, a Big Government writer who also lives in New Jersey, tweeted back, "I'm in! RT @Flynn1776 Hey@Liberty_Chick let's get NJ TeaParty folks 2 #Occupy @EricBoehlert. His paychck comes frm 1% & pol class after all."

Hmmmm.

Who likes to pin shite on Team Breitfart? Who would tweet apparent confessions just a few days prior to such activity occurring? Methinks the people behind this posing as a Verizon employee in order to harass Boehlert are actually from Team Numbnuts.

Back in July a seedy individual named Neal Rauhauser was all over my ass at The Daily Kos. Here are some excerpts from one of many entries devoted to astroturfing that I am on Team Breitfart.

Who has been in sight, frantically flogging explanations that don’t add up, is Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney John Patrick Frey, who writes under the pen name Patterico (say: pat-uh-RI-co).

And when someone forwarded me the complaint regarding Frey running a cyberstalking campaign in conjunction with [redacted], Massachusetts resident [socrates], well, maybe this whole situation is about to become much clearer.

First, take a look at the background from 2010, when he was intimately involved in defending James O’Keefe’s ACORN smear. This complaint about John Patrick Frey aka Patterico to the California Supreme Court details the perceived conflict of interest between someone who is a Deputy District Attorney and a vigorous defender of O’Keefe’s criminal capers. It also names a then anonymous cyber-stalker who used the pseudonym “Socrates”.

The author of the complaint, Brett Kimberlin of Velvet Revolution, later sued Socrates and pushed the process far enough to get Google to give up his identifying information, proving that the person behind the cyber-stalking was [socrates], of [redacted], Massachusetts. This link is to a PDF I created...

Summary: John Patrick Frey aka Patterico, in Los Angeles, worked with a cyber-stalker named [socrates] in [redacted], Massachusetts in 2010, defending the ACORN smear, a major scheme involving James O’Keefe and Andrew Breitbart.

Now consider what has happened in Weinergate and compare methods and locations.

The Dan Wolfe persona purportedly lived “near Cape Cod”. [redacted] and [socrates] lie between Boston and Cape Cod.

Now consider what has happened in Weinergate and compare

Pot meet kettle. Rauhauser is an internet thug. He seems with some others to be scouring the net for anything he can use to promote his Team Breitfart schtick. He has apparently been tied to using such a schtick via twitter.

So let's sum things up. Just days before this recent "O'Keefe-styled" event, two people affiliated with Andrew Breitbart's conservative leaning internet magazine tweeted the idea of Let's Occupy Boehlert.

I've gotten to know Liberty Chick a bit in real life. We don't agree on politics, but we have always been able to be respectful in debate with one another. Liberty Chick in no way whatsoever would have partaken in any fake Verizon scam.

There is an old adage that he who smelt it, dealt it.

I don't know anything about Ryan Grim. He has added some updates containing denials of involvement by Liberty Chick and Mike Flynn.

Perhaps Grim can explain how he learned of this story. It's very fortunate for Team Numbnuts, imho, that Boehlert was unable to jot down a license plate of the fake Verizon employee. Or perhaps Boehlert was somehow involved. I don't know. I don't know anything more about Boehlert than from what I gleaned from the HuffPost article. It wouldn't surprise me if he is buddies with Rauhauser.

Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin Wants Me Imprisoned

2011-11-24T17:48:00.000-05:00

He had his chance in court and embarrassed himself. His current attempt to have me imprisoned is hilarious. More on that in a little bit.

The original entry this article is based on was one of twenty-one deleted due to a court order. One sentence was the reason. That has been removed. I've also taken this as an opportunity to spiffy up the original which was in essence a tribute to Dave Weintraub of DFQ fame. But first here is an update on the latest Kimberlin news.

The only change in my blogging is that I've stopped getting too personal in regards to Brett Kimberlin and am humbly attempting to be more journalistic.

Since coming to terms with being an introvert, I am no longer in any psychic pain. I used to get angry or distressed and not understand why. Now I do. It's a long story better left to either a future entry, or bugger off, it's none of ye business!

I continue to get cyberstalked and cybersmeared. I continue to get harrassed by Brett Kimberlin. It didn't just end with his slandering of me in court on November 14th.

Judge Jordan did not say I could no longer blog on Brett Kimberlin, the case, etc.. In fact, he stressed because he values freedom of speech, he couldn't order that.

Judge Richard E. Jordan:

Ordered: that the Defendant is herby enjoined permanently from engaging in tortuous conduct constituting defamation of or interference with business relations of the Plaintiff.

Kimberlin has just filed a "Motion to Find Defendant In Contempt." Here are some excerpts.

The Court told Defendant that the Court was issuing a Permanent Injunction against Defendant. Despite the Court's Order and statements in Court, Defendant using the name Socrates, immediately upon return to Massachusetts began posting defamatory statements not only about Plaintiff but also about the Court.

Attached is exhibit A is a series of blog posts from Defendant dated Tuesday, November 15, 2011.

"Basically, Kimberlin had argued that my posting about him as a confidence man, perjurer, murder suspect, drug smuggler, etc. was a form of cyberstalking. Yet, those things are all facts that had already been printed by mainstream media and previous court documents."

Clearly, Defendant has no intention of ceasing his harassment of Plaintiff. He has no intention of complying with the Court's permanent injunction.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff moves the Court to find Defendant in contempt of Court and impose fines and imprisonment against him, and any other relief the Court finds appropriate.

Cry me a river!

Without further ado, here's the rewrite of one of my deleted entries.

Weintraub Versus Moulitsas; One respected the other not so much.

No Integrity

The Indictment of Markos C.A. Moulitsas
ZÚÑIGA by Justice and History (Updated
with Additional Information and Counts)
by Francis Holland

Integrity

Dave Weintraub,
affectionately known as
Dave from Queens or DFQ

First, here's some backstory. In February 2009, I emailed Number5, a Daily Kos blogger. I had been given the heave-ho. Number5 had been my only ally. He had some mojo juice in the tank and was able to correct some tag abuse on my diaries. I wanted to thank him.

Larisa Alexandrovna and MajorFlaw (DFQ's nemesis) were in high powered KosKop form. I played fair, but they were determined to belittle the messenger.

Number5 would later tell me he was a roommate of legendary Kos blogger Anonymous Army. I think they might be one and the same, but that's water under the bridge. AA had been quite adept with exposing inconsistencies pumped out by "leftist" personalities such as Larry Johnson, Jason Leopold, Brad Friedman, and many others. He called them something like The Lefty Liars Club.

Dave Weintraub developed that sort of trollbusting schtick much later in his blogging career. Before then he was one of the best political bloggers. He was a hardcore Democrat but not a so-called DINO. He also did something called street theatre. We'll get to that in a bit.

Dave was one of the last lefty bloggers on Earth to realise DKos is a disinformation pit with unfair moderating. That's because he was actually, uhm, doing good activism as a blogger. It was only after MajorFlaw (Michael Fingerit) singled him out for cybersmears via his vigilante crew the UGOG's (The Usual Group of Grownups), that Dave entered into the realm of what is now known as socratisation. p:>

I mentioned Number5 above, because he's the one who turned me on to checking into Dave from Queens.

Dave Weintraub ended up doing some incredible cybersleuthing. He discovered proof of the UGOG's existence and exposed them. I won't reinvent that wheel. His davefromqueens.com website is currently still available for perusal.

I also have a copy of the UGOG files (a saved copy of their website), if anyone is interested. The UGOG's thought they were hidden or so obscure no one would find them. One day Dave followed a referral url to his website, and that's how he found them.

I only knew Dave briefly. I dropped a few posts on his blog. I told him my concerns about Larisa Alexandrovna. He told me he wasn't aware of what I was talking of, but that he'd give me the chance to state my case. He was that cool a dude.

Dave told me to check out his article, Exposed: Why Kos Is Bad For Democrats

It's pretty good. Newbies and fence-sitters should definitely take a looksie.

Dave was a humble man. Even after single-handedly exposing the Moulitsas sanctioned KosKopper/UGOG unit, he showed regret for not having spoken up for Hillary Clinton supporters unfairly purged from Daily Kos. He also said this:

Thanks to you and countless others who have spoken out about the truth about DailyKos long before I learned about it.

Dave might have been late to becoming aware of the fake lefty ways of Daily Kos, but he certainly made up for that in a short period of time. God bless Dave Weintraub, and may he rest in peace.

Personally, I think the Obamabots versus Shrillaries thingie was a contrived script devised by insidious forces. There is no logical explanation for why any sincere Obama or Hillary supporter would have thrown the other side so forcefully under the bus.

Think of the tactics of Lee Atwater and Karl Rove. Reflect on the concept of divide and conquer. Consider how Markos Moulitsas used to support Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr.. Check out Kos' homophobic column written while in college to go with his currently being a strong supporter of the CIA. Look for his attacks on Caroline Kennedy. Search out Markos Moulitsas' historic association with payola type schemes.

Dave was very late to figuring out Daily Kos. He was a late bloomer in realising democratic processes are non-existent at that once powerful DINO (Democrat in name only) infested website. Nonetheless, Dave was the one who put the final dagger into DKos' credibility. Well-played, Mr. Bond (DFQ).

Let's take a trip back in payola time. (excerpt)

THE BLOGOSPHERE'S SMOKE-FILLED BACKROOM:
by Jason Zengerle
June 21st, 2006

Are Jerome Armstrong and Markos Moulitsas (of the famous Daily Kos) engaged in a pay-for-play scheme in which politicians who hire Armstrong as a consultant get the support of Kos? That's the question that's been bouncing around the blogosphere ever since The New York Times's Chris Suellentrop broke the news last Friday about a 2000 run-in Armstrong had with the Securities and Exchange Commission over alleged stock touting. But Armstrong, Kos, and other big-time liberal bloggers have almost entirely ignored the issue, which is a bit surprising considering their tendency to rapidly respond to even the smallest criticism.

Why the strange silence in the face of such damning allegations? Well, I think we now know the answer. It's a deliberate strategy orchestrated by Kos. TNR obtained a missive Kos sent earlier this week to "Townhouse," a private email list comprising elite liberal bloggers, including Jane Hamsher, Matt Stoller, and Christy Hardin Smith. And what was Kos's message to this group that secretly plots strategy in the digital equivalent of a smoke-filled backroom? Stay mum! He wrote (emphasis added below):
...And Jerome's case, if it could be aired out, is a non-story (he was a poor grad student at the time so he settled because he had no money). Jerome can't talk about it now since the case is not fully closed. But once it is, he'll go on the offensive. That should be a couple of months off.

This story will percolate in wingnut circles until then, but I haven't gotten a single serious media call about it yet. Not one. So far, this story isn't making the jump to the traditional media, and we shouldn't do anything to help make that happen.

My request to you guys is that you ignore this for now. It would make my life easier if we can confine the story. Then, once Jerome can speak and defend himself, then I'll go on the offensive (which is when I would file any lawsuits) and anyone can pile on. If any of us blog on this right now, we fuel the story. Let's starve it of oxygen. And without the "he said, she said" element to the story, you know political journalists are paralyzed into inaction.

Thanks, markos
...

P.S. Was Armstrong really, as Kos claims, a "poor grad student" when he settled with the SEC? Armstrong agreed to the settlement in December 2003. That was eleven months after he and Kos started their political consulting business and six months after the two were hired by the Dean campaign at a rate of $3,000 a month.

If Markos Moulitsas told the truth about his involvement with the CIA, it does appear he was on their payroll while running Daily Kos.

I sincerely believe Markos Moulitsas Zuniga does have family ties to people associated with the death squad part of El Salvadoran history. Though obviously he was clearly too young to have been involved with any of that. In some countries, the gulf between rich and poor is very wide. Moulitsas was born into the minority wealthy side of El Salvador.

I believe Moulitsas has been an opportunist akin to an Arianna Huffington. They both saw which way the wind was blowing. That, imho, explains their sudden transformations from being conservatives to so-called liberals. Ka-ching!

According to Moulitsas' words himself, he was about to sign a CIA contract to work for clandestine operations. He says he instead made the decision to work for Howard Dean. Check out what he said for yourselves. Check out the timeline. And for those who have slammed Francis Holland, shame on friggen you!

possibly related tangent:
The CIA and the Media
by Carl Bernstein
Rolling Stone
Oct. 20, 1977

This has been a tale of two bloggers, one with integrity and the other, imho, with none. Dave Weintraub was a real progressive activist. Moulitsas? Get out of town!

McCain's Town Hall Was A Farce, I Was There.
by davefromqueens
Fri Jun 13, 2008

(long excerpt) Yesterday, I drove to New Jersey, quietly stood on line which ushered me into the Community College Auditorium in Pemberton, picked a good spot on the third level of benches, pretended to clap and applaud when John McCain said stupid things which I didn't agree with, all with the hopes of being called on by one of the McCain staffers holding a microphone. I was oh so close. I was next on the other side of the auditorium when McCain abruptly ended the supposedly open town hall where he allegedly takes tough questions after 1 questioner, who only got called on because his nine year old kid was next to him, asked McCain about Bin Laden.

McCain's so called town halls are actually rallies hosted by the local Republican Party. The host, Chris Myers, identified himself as a local leader and claimed that New Jersey is going to go red because of the 2000 people in the gym. (About 1% of us were Obama supporters, someone held a sign up at the end, no one interrupted McCain's speech.) However if McCain can't fill a small gym in his only trip to New Jersey this month, his candidacy is in trouble.

The seating was staged. There were about 20 people with Veteran's hats and all were seated directly in line with McCain's podium in the front and back. Your cameras from home would make it appear that half the people there were veterans. In reality it was about 1%. Mixed into the Veterans was one angry woman who had a sign claiming she was a Hillary supporter voting McCain. This one sign was placed directly in the spot where the cameras were most likely to pick it up. She was planted there. It also appears that there was one singular woman who pulled the same stunt Thursday night at the so called Fox News McCain town hall meeting in New York. These people aren't real Clinton supporters, this too is staged.

The event began with the Pledge of Allegiance and an invocation. In a multicultural country, an invocation is kind of creepy. The latter is not exactly inclusive but it appeared that all cameras were directed off during the invocation so that this non inclusive invocation could not be shown.

Then, all the local politicians getting stage time, including the Congressman in the area, and the Jersey candidates for the House and Senate. Dick Zimmer, the former Congressman running against Frank Lautenberg, was received tepidly by what should have been a friendly crowd. People in Jersey know what a nasty louse Dick Zimmer truly is.

Then Joe Lieberman took the stage claiming he was a Democrat supporting John McCain while taking pot shots at Obama in vague terms. Joe is no Democrat. Then it was Tom Kean, the whitewasher of the 9/11 committee, trying to give McCain credit for the commission which McCain and Republicans have sandbagged the American people with. Then John McCain took the stage.

McCain spoke for about thirty minutes. He praised people. It was hysterical when McCain praised Lieberman as helping him win New Hampshire. Lieberman started smirking, lifting his head smugly, while bearing a Cheshire cat grin as if Lieberman was somehow important and relevant. Smugness and Vanity would be understatements. Joe Lieberman and John McCain have been big reasons why Washington has failed the American people for the past 30 years so the more irrelevant they are, the better off the American people are.

McCain fumbled through his sound bites all while claiming that people are tired of sound bites. McCain used harsh and partisan rhetoric all while claiming that this needs to change. Large sections of McCain's audience booed when McCain was misrepresenting Obama's position but McCain of course calls for civil dialogue while never denouncing the uncivil nature of his supporters. Shockingly he claimed he did not know what climate change was in 2000 but has since read up on it. He foolishly claims that Iraq is the central focus on the War on Terror merely because David Petraeus says so. McCain said that the Obama camp is going to try and claim that he is for privatizing Social Security and that this is untrue. He then claimed he was against privatizing Social Security while in the very next sentence, proposing a policy that was, in effect, privatizing Social Security. Now there's video showing McCain supporting the privatization of Social Security in 2004 despite McCain saying that he's never supported it. McCain lies at the drop of a hat. It's obvious to most people. This was one of McCain's big gaffes today.

McCain also doesn't understand habeas corpus. He claimed the recent 5-4 decision on detainees was perhaps the worst in history because they are "enemy combatants." John McCain doesn't understand that many of the people in Guantanamo are at best "accused enemy combatants." He also seem confused between habeas corpus and tort remedies. But under this McCain Doctrine, any person in the world could be thrown in prison by John McCain merely because John McCain labels him a terrorist. There are some nefarious names throughout history that held the same view.

It was laughable when McCain tried to talk about education. He was ill informed and elitist. First it was the usual gobbly-gook about private schools and school choice, which of course isn't school choice at all. Then McCain had the audacity to equate him and Cindy sending their kids to super rich, super well funded private schools as if everybody would have access to this. It was bizarre.

McCain has his usual sound bites and the event was craftily staged. Approximately 200 people were hand selected ahead of time to be in a separate VIP area behind McCain and in front of McCain. This was a campaign rally not a town hall meeting and this needs to be emphasized.

Next came the questions and answers. McCain had said how much he loves to do town hall meetings because he likes to answer tough questions......

Dave was clearly not a hippie. Nonetheless, he was definitely a pure liberal against illegal wars and into fighting on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Regular Guy.

Darn, I wish he was around to go for a Guinness. I sure as heck would have tried to become his friend. He was a great man.

The below photo was from the Connecticut Post.

The caption says,
Wearing a George Bush mask, an anti-war protestor who would only identify himself as Dave W. from Queens, N.Y. confronts Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, as he arrives for a fundraiser in downtown Milford for Milford Mayor James Richetelli, a Republican.

(above excerpt from How the Connecticut Post Tried To Smear Bushman by: bigdavefromqueens Tue Oct 16, 2007)

Dave was attacked with some of the worst defamation I've ever seen on the internet. He was attacked by self-proclaimed leftists who should have embraced him rather than try to tear him apart.

Barbara Morrill and Scout Finch, who both recommended the above post, were or still are DKos administrators. "Elise" must have had a lot of negative chutzpah to post that Dave was an asshole just after he had died. Unless someone is Hitler or similar, it is never justifiable to speak badly of the dead.

There is too much hate speech on alleged "progressive" domains. Dave referred to Markos Moulitsas and his Kos Kops as turn-off trolls. He was correct. It's as if insidious forces do not want pure Democrats with idealistic democratic values to succeed. At a minimum, nasty people such as Zuniga and his crones are making a buck off of the Democratic label with little or no regard for such things as ending illegal wars, helping out the poor, ensuring equal schools, etc..

This should come as no surprise, for Markos Moulitsas Zuniga was a rightwinger whose historical family roots tie him to the El Salvadoran oligarchy. In the past, Markos has been a big supporter of Ronald Reagan, homophobia, and working for individual campaigns based on personal goals centered around monetary objectives and self-promotion.

Who you gonna believe in- a true progressive like Dave or UGOG KosKops like Michael Fingerit, Lloyd Lachow, and Michael Bouldin? Who you gonna believe in- an honest Democrat like DaveFromQueens or a status quo, mediocre sycophant like Barbara Morrill? Who you gonna believe in- a devoted, principled activist like Dave or a supporter of the CIA? Whom does Markos Moulitsas Zuniga think he's fooling parading around like a progressive, when he is really just another run of the mill fake lefty, whose fifteen minutes of fame have passed?

Incestuous Relationships Part 2

2011-11-23T14:40:00.000-05:00

Nathan Diebenow wrote, "The [Lonestar] Iconoclast is one of VR's affiliates." According to the Business Dictionary (in regards to commerce), "Two parties are affiliates if either party has the power to control the other, or a third party controls or has the power to control the both. Affiliation also exists in (1) interlocking directorates or ownership, ..."

On June 6, 2009, Brad Friedman penned:

Cindy Sheehan to RAW STORY on Their Coverage of Her Upcoming Bush/Dallas Protest: 'Eff' You! Controversial 'Peace Mom' also blasts Crawford's 'Lonestar Iconoclast' for 'stabbing [her] in the back'

Further down Brad made a disclosure. BradBlog also covered the "Camp Casey" story. It partnered with Raw Story for two weeks of broadcasting. Brad mentioned working a bit with The Iconoclast, in addition to Diebenow's front page article promoting VR's Dept. of Justice schtick. I don't see any mention of The Lonestar Iconoclast being a VR affiliate. It is interesting to note that according to Brad's article, Raw Story's Stephen C. Webster worked for months for The Iconoclast.

Webster notes that he "would link to sources" backing up his claims of criticism from the left, "but that bit comes first-hand." He recounts that he'd "spen[t] months covering Cindy's activity for The Lone Star Iconoclast in Crawford," and writes that he "understand[s] many of the various opinions expressed about this woman's activism."

It's shocking how Cindy was broadsided by people marketing themselves as leftists.

Brad continued:

[Webster] then goes on to associate with his former Iconoclast colleague Nathan Diebenow who, he writes, "quite accurately summarized, her constant angling for the spotlight and failure to significantly modify her tactics," which, Webster goes on to charge, "made Cindy into a 'media bore' (as opposed to the oft referenced 'media whore' insult so many on the right would hurl at her)."

Then Brad segued into incorporating Raw Story's Ron Brynaert into this news making news clusterfocker.

UPDATE: Shortly after publishing this story, we were contacted by RAW STORY Executive Editor, Ron Brynaert who asked us to include the following comment:
That was a blog at Raw Story, written by one reporter here, who - of course - is free to express his own opinions (at least in the blog section).

I personally think Cindy Sheehan rocks. I think she's been a tremendous voice against the war in Iraq and I applauded her quixotic campaign against Pelosi. Sometimes I don't agree with her, but not only do I thank her for her voice, I wish that other relatives of our troops pro or con against the war could be heard, as well, because they all deserve the biggest spotlight that there is.

Ron Brynaert
Executive Editor
www.rawstory.com

Hmmm. According to Mr. Antiwar Brynaert, relatives in favour of the war (along with those against) "deserve the biggest spotlight that there is." As internet kids like to say, "Wow, just wow."

Webster's "Peace Mom' to hound Bush in Dallas" leads to a 404 error message. It is also unavailable at archive.org.

In short, imho, the relationships among all these various internet personalities have been non-sexually incestuous. Former Bradblog blogger Dave Edwards has been a Raw Story video editor. Raw Story's Larisa Alexandrovna lied on behalf of VR's Brett Kimberlin. According to VR itself, attorney Cliff Arnebeck has worked for VR. Former Raw Story executive editor Ron Brynaert used to regularly post at BradBlog. Then there is Anthony Levensalor. In the early days of BradBlog he posted as ~A. He has worked for both VR and Raw Story. (Ron Brynaert and Anthony also used to blog together on something called Watching the Watchers.)

related link

Anyone interested in this kind of junk is encouraged to slog through my astroturfing section easily accessed through the above link. There are also a few entries at Daily Kos written under my Prepostericity username.

Bonus Off-Topic Excerpt from Mark Singer's excellent book, Citizen K; The Deeply Weird American Journey of Brett Kimberlin

The intense but almost ineffable entanglements in Sandi and Brett's lives could be rendered for the jury only in elliptical terms. During cross-examination, Pylitt managed to extract the information that Kimberlin and Sandi's younger daughter had traveled alone together to Disney World, Mexico, and Hawaii. For Pylitt to delve extensively into that particular anomaly, however, would have risked a mistrial. In the courtroom, the Scyphers murder was off-limits, and the theory that early on had galvanized the government's investigation-that the bombings grew out of the murder-could not be delineated. At the conclusion of the trial, newspaper interviews with jurors indicated that their deliberations were free of musings about the murder. Several jurors simply hadn't realized that Sandra Barton was Julia Scyphers' daughter. The Indianapolis News quoted one: "I didn't know about it until I got home and my wife told me. Had we known, there might have been some more questions about her testimony." Thus the apparent lack of motive for the bombings increased the prosecutor's burden of proof.

Citizen K by Mark Singer
Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1996, pp. 135-136

Incestuous Relationships Part 1

2011-11-19T18:31:00.000-05:00

The previous chapter covered the awkward relationship between attorney Cliff Arnebeck and Velvet Revolution. Now let's shift gears to that between VR and Raw Story.

According to The LA Steel Show, which interviewed Brett Coleman Kimberlin in January 2008, "[He is] the man behind e-voting investigations of BradBlog.com and the investigative internet journal Raw Story.com."

According to Action Point, Kimberlin was a co-founder of Raw Story.

When I mentioned the connection made by The LA Steel Show on a now scrubbed article at Democratic Underground, a raw nerve was hit in Raw Story's Larisa Alexandrovna.

Putting that strange denial to the side, there is no doubt Alexandrovna and Kimberlin are closely linked. We have the blogger's own words confirming it.

Larisa posts as lala_rawraw at Democratic Underground. In October 2006 she peddled the idea that Brett Kimberlin was an exonerated ex-political prisoner, that he never set any bombs.

you know, you read this and you think you know... but I know Brett... and I know the story of his arrest and what really happened. he has been funding the voter fraud allegations, the afterdowningstreet people, etc... you simply don't know what you are talking about. oh, and he was also the same person who found Clint Curtis, and Diebthroat. wow, he must be a con man after all.....

i wish this whole post could be deleted because the man has been through a great deal already....

I can only say that he was wrongly convicted, released, sued the government and won. As part of the agreement, he cannot discuss the particulars publicly. By the way, the real interest in those articles calling him a con man is that no one points out that he was the guy who - during the Regan/Quayle election, who came forward and blew the whistle on Dan's little drug problem... see, Brett sold him dope. I wonder why a guy who sued the government and won would suddenly be a con man? Swift boat anyone? ....

he was convicted wrongfully and he even served time for something he did not do while is attorneys fought the conviction... it was overturned, he was exhonirated, and then he sued and won!

he was put into jail because he was talking about Danny Quayle's drug habbit... welcome to Amerika ....

i have not denied he sold pot, in fact i actually said so... oh boy, those evil post sellers. but you are right... a man who has spent the last 17 years of his life doing work on behalf of the American citizen should be locked up forever for having sold pot.....

he was wrongly convicted, jailed, served time and then won his case of a wrongful conviction and was exonerated. he sued the government and won. he has since used that money to pay for things like Rock the Vote, etc. the only "crime" he ever committed was that he sold weed when he was in his 20s....

i have an idea... given that as part of the agreement, he has not been allowed to discuss it, consider how someone sentenced to 51 years on terrorism charges is not in jail? how is it someone like this is simply let go and has a clean record on this original charge? ....

the Google pieces that appear are based on the journalists book, after he wet himself... it is a smear piece and it is not accurate for a reason... the journalist is trying to blame his shoddy reporting on his source.

Well, when was Brett Kimberlin allegedly exonerated? According to Michael Jesse of The Indianapolis Star:

Kimberlin was paroled in 1994 after serving about 13 years of his 50-year sentence. But when he made no effort to pay the DeLong judgment his parole was revoked in 1997 and he went back to prison for about four more years, released again in 2001.

I guess the exoneration and compensation reward for false imprisonment was delivered sometime between 2001 and 2006. But we will never know because part of the agreement was the details could not be disclosed. [/rolling eyes]

On November 6, 2004, Kimberlin's Justice Through Music offered $100,000 to anyone who could prove the 2004 Presidential election was stolen. The offer jumped to $200,000 on November 16th.

According to this link, Justice Through Music offered the following advice.

Persons who want to make a tax-deductible contribution to this reward fund can do so through the secure PAYPAL donation button on the right. We want to provide the strongest incentive possible for people to come forward with substantial inside information, so make your donations generous. In the event no one meets the criteria for the reward, all funds donated to the reward fund shall be used to insure that all future votes are verifiable through a countable paper trail.

According to centralops.net, velvetrevolution.us was registered on November 12, 2004.

The following is from Time Magazine's Wizard of Odd article:

The turning point for Kimberlin came with an idea to attract attention. Before the 2004 presidential election, he contacted the wealthy head of a foundation in Ohio who practiced transcendental meditation with Kimberlin's sister. After the vote, with a pledge from the benefactor, Kimberlin posted on justicethroughmusic.org a $100,000 reward for any evidence that the election had been stolen. And things took off. First, the reward attracted blogger Brad Friedman, who then co-founded the netroots voting-reform website VelvetRevolution.us with Kimberlin and serves as his face man. The reward attracted other donors (including a politically active relative of mine who last year introduced me to Kimberlin). And it produced several people who claimed to have information on problems with electronic voting. They were prominently displayed on Friedman's site, BradBlog.com. Leveraging his website's popularity, Kimberlin made contact with congressional staff members and other activists, launching coordinated netroots campaigns for the cause.

Brad Friedman wrote that this blog entry was "fine coverage on how VR came about."

Blogger Brad Friedman (http://BradBlog.com) has joined forces with several other blogger and indy news sources to create http://velvetrevolution.us, which seems to be taking names and preparing for what they hope to be a grand collaboration between protest elements.

Brett Kimberlin was never mentioned. The "other blogger and indy news sources" were not discussed. One can go through BradBlog archives tagged VelvetRevolution.us and see that Brett Kimberlin wasn't mentioned until May 31, 2007, approximately four months after the Time Magazine article was published.

Even then, Brad downplayed Brett's primary role in creating Velvet Revolution.

The activist, Brett Kimberlin, is a director at Justice Through Music, which is a co-founder, along with The BRAD BLOG of the Election and Media Reform organization, VelvetRevolution.us.

Brad wrote:

Kimberlin was recently featured in an article by the Lonestar Iconoclast, George W. Bush's "hometown paper" in Crawford, Texas, after the release of his anti-war "Happy Springtime (Bush is Over)" song and video...which we highly recommend, by the way.

Kimberlin isn't mentioned in the second link from the above paragraph.

Stacking the cards refers to a process by which not enough information is provided to readers in order to form their own opinions.

VR's co-founder becomes Justice Through Music rather than Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin. If you go to the RawStory link, you'll see a comment by Storm, an Op-Critical band member. You'll see a statement by Justice Through Music spokesman Craig Gillette. You won't see any mention of Kimberlin. In Brad's October 2007 piece More Dead Cause of Ohio, Velvet Revolution wasn't mentioned, as if he didn't want to associate Brett's name too much to VR.

The Lonestar Iconoclast Connection

The Lonestar Iconoclast link from above leads to a 404 error message. Yet we still have access to it through archive.org. Oopsies, now that leads to "Page cannot be crawled or displayed due to robots.txt."

The article was written by Nathan Diebenow, and he made a fascinating disclosure. Below is a screenshot I took from that article before it was blocked.

Kimberlin was also featured in another Diebenow piece written in December 2007 titled Plumbers 2.0 (Page cannot be crawled or displayed due to robots.txt).

"I believe this guy (Connell) is the equivalent of the Watergate plumbers. I mean, there are so many folks in the Bush administration that are former Nixonites like Cheney and Rumsfeld," said Kimberlin, referring to the break-in of the Democratic National Committee’s offices that lead to President Nixon’s resignation.

"They have that mentality: ‘Nixon is a good guy. He got screwed over. The ends justify the means.’"

Right now, VR is sorting out the information they already have on Connell, but they are searching for more from his employees in order to "bring him to justice" through congressional hearings.

The article also included this (emphasis mine):

"We’ve found he’s really been involved in every major GOP election issue or scandal since at least 2000," said Brett Kimberlin, founder/president of VR, in an interview with the Iconoclast.

On May 20, 2009, Bradblog informed its readers Diebenow got VR frontpage coverage. VR has a formula. They come up with various campaigns and then ask for donations. One of them was called Disbar Torture Lawyers.

The link to that Iconoclast article now leads to "Error 404 - Page Not Found." A while back I was able to locate the edition. It is also no longer available but a screenshot was taken of the front page.

The end of Diebenow's piece directed readers to RestoreJusticeAtJustice.com. That redirects to Velvet Revolution.

On a side note, at the bottom of the VR affiliate's front page an Eric May is referenced. He is basically a kooky conspiracy theorist with ties to anti-semitism. See CNN's Some suspect conspiracy in Holocaust Museum case.

In part 2 of Incestuous Relationships, we'll look more closely at the connections between Velvet Revolution and Raw Story.

Related Links (get out your checkbooks!):

Stop Domestic Terrorism

Standing For Voters

Standing For Voters' donation link currently redirects to Velvet Revolution's donation page, as does Indict Breitbart Dot Org.

www.StopTheChamber.com: A VelvetRevolution.us Campaign

Michael Connell Was Never Threatened By Karl Rove

2011-11-18T22:56:00.002-05:00

In e-mails and Web postings from Kimberlin's two organizations, Justice Through Music and Velvet Revolution, he intersperses occasionally useful pieces of information about the problems of e-voting with a hefty portion of bunk, repeatedly asserting as fact things that are not true.

Excerpt above from The Wizard of Odd By Massimo Calabresi Friday, Jan. 05, 2007

One might as well consider if the moon is made out of cheese, if they sincerely think Michael Connell's life was in jeopardy due to Karl Rove. Connell wasn't about to spill any beans concerning the 2004 Ohio election.

The burden of proof is on the conspiracy theorists.

All they have ever delivered has been akin to the stuff one sees while waiting in supermarket checkout lines.

Elvis Opens Up McDonalds Franchise On Mars

Barbara Walters Secret Lesbian Affair With Star Jones Exposed

You get the idea. Not believable.

The November 9th, 2009 BradBlog delivered:

Exclusive: Mike Connell's Family Copes With His Mysterious Death, Tipsters, Legal Options

According to guest blogger Rebecca Abrahams, Heather Connell "acknowledges he received threats in the months leading up to his death."

I have spent days and days and days trying to figure it all out. I don't think he would lie to me. Number one, I don't think he took the threats seriously.

Abrahams directed the reader to a previous Brad Friedman post to learn more about the threats.

But first one is able to scroll down Abrahams' piece and hear about alleged tips.

Heather and six others received a memo from "Mark Felt" explaining that Michael Connell's small aircraft had been sabotaged. There is no word as of today whether the note also contained proof that the moon is indeed made out of cheese.

Abrahams went on to claim those close to the case believe the memo was legit, that Connell was very possibly murdered, and the FBI is on it. That's the stuff!

Hmmm. I wonder who were the ones close to the case. It could be anyone. Ha!

Attorney Cliff Arnebeck shared this:

We received copies of the "deep throat" letter and redacted report of a jackal that "is not supposed to exist." We passed on to the FBI this and other information we have relevant to the matter. Our impression is that the FBI is doing its job of investigating specific allegations regarding the assassination of a vital witness in our federal election fraud case.

Who is Cliff Arnebeck?

According to Velvet Revolution, he's their attorney.

A tipster close to the McCain campaign disclosed to VR in July that Mr. Connell’s life was in jeopardy and that Karl Rove had threatened him and his wife, Heather. VR’s attorney, Cliff Arnebeck, notified the United States Attorney General , Ohio law enforcement and the federal court about these threats and insisted that Mr. Connell be placed in protective custody. VR also told a close associate of Mr. Connell’s not to fly his plane because of another tip that the plane could be sabotaged. Mr. Connell, a very experienced pilot, has had to abandon at least two flights in the past two months because of suspicious problems with his plane. On December 18, 2008, Mr. Connell flew to a small airport outside of Washington DC to meet some people. It was on his return flight the next day that he crashed.

Then there is the other link mentioned above to learn more!!!!

Rove Threatened GOP IT Guru If He Does Not 'Take the Fall' for Election Fraud in Ohio, Says Attorney by Brad Friedman on 7/24/2008

Brad held no punches.

Karl Rove has threatened a GOP high-tech guru and his wife, if he does not "'take the fall' for election fraud in Ohio," according to a letter sent this morning to Attorney General Michael Mukasey, by Ohio election attorney Cliff Arnebeck.

Hmmm. There was no disclaimer that Cliff Arnebeck is "VR's attorney."

Anyway, intrepid muckraker Brad Friedman continued,

In a phone call this afternoon, Arnebeck could not publicly reveal specific details of the information that triggered his concern about the threats to Connell. The message to the IT man from Rove is said to have been sent via a go-between in Ohio. That information led Arnebeck to contact Mukasey after he found the reports to be credible and troubling.

"If there's a credible threat, which I regard this to be," he told The BRAD BLOG, "I have a professional duty to report it."

Attempts to reach Connell for comment late this afternoon were not successful.

For those who can't put 2+2 together, apparently Heather Connell learned of so-called threats via Velvet Revolution (Brett + Brad + Cliff) then ended up being interviewed and/or blogged on by Brad and his associates.

The Threats Against, and Death of Michael Connell May 22nd, 2009 (pdf)

33. I regard Michael Connell’s death as a tragedy. The major news coverage of the crash of his airplane on December 19, 2008, was by a joint CBS and Associated Press story that included film of his burning plane. The story of the crash and Connell’s relation to this litigation appeared in the business section of the New York Times. It was also featured on the front page of the Cleveland Plain Dealer as part of a story that the writer said sounded like a John Grisham novel.

34. Bob Fitrakis and I met personally with US Rep. Dennis Kucinich at the US Capital to urge him to interview Michael Connell and call him as a witness before his oversight subcommittee.

35. I met personally with US Rep. John Conyers at the Rainbow-PUSH headquarters building in Chicago to urge that he interview and call Stephen Spoonamore and Michael Connell as a witness before his House Judiciary Committee.

36. Two individuals who have funded Velvet Revolution joined us in our meeting with Rep Kucinich. Sometime afterwards they committed to make substantial donations in support of our litigation to hold Karl Rove accountable for his ongoing activity to rig Presidential elections. Their contributions were sent to Velvet Revolution as the charitable 501(c)(3) for forwarding to us for use in this litigation. We have not engaged in fund-raising in concert with Velvet Revolution.

37. Michael Connell had agreed to come forward to meet with House Judiciary Committee staff. However, according to the declaration of Brett Kimberlin of Velvet Revolution, this did work its way through the committee bureaucracy. Kimberlin Declaration paragraph 6.

38. Our efforts to secure Connell’s testimony in our case, after a threat by Rove against Connell had been reported to us, were supported by the Ohio Secretary of State and Attorney General offices and two federal judges. This resulted in lifting the stay in our case to enable us to seek the deposition of Connell, and the court order for Connell’s appearance in court and at deposition, in Cleveland.

39. Had Connell chosen to seek protection in the course of these proceedings, we believe he would have received it. Without his pursuit of witness protection from law enforcement authorities, we could not obtain it for him.

Further Progress in this Case

40. Since the tragic death of Michael Connell, a new witness has come forward with evidence linking the election rigging activities of this decade to organized crime operations based in Enterprise, AL. This witness has inside knowledge of this organized crime operation. This witness has also opened communication for us with another witness who has inside knowledge of Karl Rove’s activities.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 22, 2009.

Clifford O. Arnebeck, Jr.

Organised crime in Enterprise, Alabama? Too bad an older James Cagney isn't still around to play Rove. You double-crossing rat, Connell. I wonder who those two donors mentioned in #36 were. Lori Grace and Harriet Crosby? Lori is the wealthy heiress to the Oliver Grace fortune. Harriet Crosby is also a wealthy philanthropist who just happens to be Brett Kimberlin's aunt.

Kaching!

A Quandary

2011-11-17T17:11:00.000-05:00

While there's no proof anything written in deleted articles was false, it doesn't seem legally they can be reposted. Hmmm.

I guess there are two options.

Perhaps the stuff could be put together into book form.

Maybe I could pick and choose good research done and simply come up with new narratives.

My apologies go out to anyone who left comments on those threads.

It's time for me to find a 1st amendment attorney. It's time to go on the offensive.

Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin Wins Frivolous Lawsuit!

2011-11-16T18:55:00.000-05:00

StarFiles: The Speedway Bombings, Part 2
Building the case against Brett Kimberlin

Or did he?

WHEREFORE, Kimberlin prays that the Court grant the following relief:

a. Find that Socrates has defamed and libeled Kimberlin.

b. Find that Socrates has harassed and cyber stalked Kimberlin, and violated his privacy.

c. Find that Socrates has interfered with Kimberlin’s business and business relationships.

d. Issue a Cease and Desist Order against Socrates prohibiting him from writing about, contacting, contacting other people about, or having anything to do with Kimberlin.

e. Issue an Order to remove all references to Kimberlin on Socrates’ Google Blogger page.

f. Enter judgment in favor of Kimberlin in the amount of $1,250,000 in compensatory damages.

g. Enter judgment in favor on Kimberlin in the amount of $1,000,000 in punitive damages.

h. Such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Brett Kimberlin

I am a poor nobody from Massachusetts. I tried to make it down to Maryland, before this thing entered into a default judgement. The default actually should have been reversed, but the presiding Judge Richard E. Jordan is a rookie whose resume shows his specialty is "ambulance chasing." We'll get to Jordan a bit later.

Let's talk causation. A default judgement is basically proof of nothing.

Brett Kimberlin was awarded $100 because of that and a judge who, imho, didn't like me. I'm awaiting a copy of the proceedings. Then we'll be able to get into specifics. I'm not going to go by memory. However, I will point out my opinion that I was clearly the smartest person in the room and proved that Kimberlin was slandering me with his testimony.

Here's what was proven on November 14, 2011.

* There was no defamation or libel
* There was no harassment, cyberstalking, or violation of Bwett's privacy.
* There was no proof I had illegally interfered with his business or associates.
* There are no limits on my blogging. No more than anyone else. I can even repost what was scrubbed. I can write on whomever or whatever I want to. HA!
* I can write the name Brett Kimberlin. He's a public figure.
* Hmmm, what can one get for $100?

Los Angeles Asst. District Attorney Patrick Frey tweeted the following advice.

Ok, here's my plan. To repeat, I'm not going to go by memory. Once we have the audio, then the truth can be published exactly. I will say this. Brett Kimberlin yet again denied having set bombs in Indiana. I think he claimed to have been exonerated, but as part of an agreement, that can't be disclosed publicly. But we need to get his exact testimony from the audio and not rely on what I think I heard.

There's a lot of other incredible stuff to share. But let's do it right. Patience is a virtue.

I done good.

Now let's talk about the judge a bit, then after maybe I can start the process of reposting all the shite google was forced to erase.

His name is Richard E. Jordan.

According to The Office of Governor Martin O'Malley of Maryland, "[Richard E. “Rick” Jordan] specializes in personal injury cases." Hey, let's fill all court vacancies with ambulance chasers. That's the stuff!

Mr. Jordan also served as a prosecutor for Montgomery County. You think he might have a bias against defendants?

I made it to two hearings. Those were a bitch of an undertaking. You can drive for seven or eight hours through toll and pollution infested New York, New Jersey, and Delaware into the fascist center of the American universe, or you can take a ten or eleven hour trek without tolls through beautiful but manured saturated Pennsylvania. Pick your poison. Either way, you end up driving all night, going to a hearing, and then driving all day to get back home to where the constitution gets quite a bit more respect, imho.

For the first hearing I attended, a motion to reverse the default was submitted. I was never actually physically handed the writ of summons. In Maryland, that is considered illegal service.

So Ricky said, to paraphrase, hmmmm, let me check on the law for how to handle this, since the defendant is from out-of-state. He returned and said something like in Massachusetts, a rent-a-cop can leave a summons outside one's home, and that makes it legit.

Legal nerds might want to check out this ruling by the Maryland High Court, who I bet would have accepted my motion to reverse the default judgement.

Maryland High Court Rejects Virginia Service of Process Rule On Maryland Residents

On appeal, the Maryland Court of Appeals, in a 4-3 opinion, reversed and granted the Miserandinos' motion to strike. The court observed that, even though service of process complied with Virginia's method for service, service was not sufficient if that method violated federal due process. The Court of Appeals identified the issue as whether "original service of process by first class mail is constitutionally sufficient to confer in personam jurisdiction over a nonresident individual in a long-arm jurisdiction case." In analyzing that issue, the court balanced the interests of the state against the right of the individuals to due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment. The court found that there was no Virginia interest present that outweighed or justified resort to what the court regarded as the significantly less certain procedure of first-class mail as a means for notifying a defendant of an action against him -especially in light of the availability of more reliable methods of service, such as hand-delivery or certified mail, as required by Maryland law. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals denied full faith and credit to the Virginia judgment and found the Virginia process rule as it relates to Maryland residents unconstitutional.

What a load of bullshit. Judge Jordan has discriminated against me for not being from Maryland. Doesn't our constitution say that all men are created equal? Why is a Maryland citizen protected by the 14th Amendment, while non-residents are not? It's not like Massachusetts has a vested interest in seeing me smeared and slandered by Brett Kimberlin.

But this is what one should expect in a country that discriminates against the poor. There is no free speech in this country. I found two attorneys willing to take my case, but they wanted tens of thousands of dollars to represent.

Last night I was thinking of suing Mr. Jordan, but that will probably be too difficult. My tort against him, imho, would amount to a small court claim. As a public employee, he would be exempt from myself being able to do that. I would love to get him in a situation where he can't browbeat me with threats of arrest for contempt.

Not only is Judge Jordan a former ambulance chaser, imho, he appeared to have a negative disposition towards defendants representing themselves. Well, I didn't have the money to get a lawyer, Rickster.

As for possible future lawsuits I appear justified to file, the people who have libeled and cybersmeared me will probably be scheduled for court dates on my own home turf in Massachusetts. It should be much easier to find pro bono representation as a plaintiff rather than a defendant in a civil case.

I now await the audio which proves I was slandered in Monday's court proceeding. This whole lawsuit in and of itself was libel. I proved that in court. The only reason Kimberlin received 100 clams was because of the default judgement. I wish I had that audio right now. My constitutional rights have been violated. If there's any way to legally address this, I WILL!

Related Reading (hat tip to Liberty Chick):
Law school analysis suggests legal protection for blogger/journalists

Amanda Knox Freed; Italy Requests Emergency U.N. Aid For Egg Removal From Nation's Face

2011-10-04T21:58:00.001-04:00

Amanda Knox in a Perugia, Italy, courtroom on Monday after her conviction was overturned.

Amanda Knox did not deserve to have so many years of her life wasted. The prosecutor who somehow was able to get a guilty verdict is a confirmed fruitcake.

If you click on the image above, it will take you to that N.Y. Times article. Apparently Giuliano Mignini isn't the only one living in denial.

The joyful reaction of the defendants contrasted sharply with the looks of ashen disappointment by prosecutors and relatives of Ms. Kercher. They had flown to Perugia on Monday.

“It was a bit of a shock obviously,” her sister, Stephanie Kercher, said on Italian television after the verdict. Lyle Kercher, the brother of the slain woman, said he was “very disappointed.” He added, “In any case, no one will give us Meredith back, but we are very upset.”

So apparently the family of the murder victim are in favour of police and prosecutors fixating on murder suspects and running with that football despite there being a dearth of uhm actual evidence.

The UK Guardian has succinctly summed it all up.

Amanda Knox: victim of Italian code which puts saving face before justice

US writer Douglas Preston argues that the rush to judgment over Meredith Kercher was to save prosecutor Guiliano Mignini, the police and the judiciary from public humiliation. Mignini has claimed that Preston is masterminding a US press campaign against him over his handling of the Amanda Knox case

The story begins almost a decade ago, long before Meredith Kercher's murder, when the pubblico ministero (public prosecutor) of Perugia, Giuliano Mignini, opened an investigation into the mysterious death of a doctor whose body was found floating in Lake Trasimeno in 1985.

Mignini believed the doctor was connected to a satanic sect, which had murdered him because he was about to go to the police and reveal its many crimes. Mignini believed this shadowy cult was connected to infamous murders committed by a serial killer known as the Monster of Florence....

Then, in 2007, came the murder of Meredith Kercher. Mignini took up the case with a vengeance. He and the entire Perugian power establishment, who approved various stages in the investigation and subsequent arrests, rushed to judgment. Believing that Knox's behaviour after the killing was less than normal, they hauled her in for a gruelling and possibly abusive 14-hour interrogation and extracted a compromising statement from her. That was enough....

About 50% of all criminal convictions in Italy are reversed or greatly modified on appeal. Knox and Sollecito join the 4 million Italians since the war who have seen their lives ruined by false criminal charges, only to be proclaimed innocent after many years of agony and imprisonment.

While they don't like others pointing it out, many Italians are well aware that their judicial system is dysfunctional. Silvio Berlusconi is absolutely right when he says the judiciary needs fundamental reform. The Italian judiciary, a holdover to a great extent from the Mussolini era, when Italy was a police state, acts with no checks and balances, in which prosecutors and police wield enormous power.

Look, I admit this blog entry has been mailed in. Nonetheless, as 2+2=4, so it can be said that the satanic panic has been a rubbish craze that has ruined many lives. It's time for Italy to get its act together, or they should expect a massive drop in tourism. Who wants to visit a country that is this backwards and would take so many years to correct such an obvious and idiotic injustice?

By the way, there is a certain individual by the name of Neil Brick who claims to have been some form of manchurian brainwashed assassin. He has sued blogger Doug Mesner. Brick's attorney has actually subpoenaed my yahoo account.

I wrote to the attorney basically asking wtf, wondering if he had actually researched Neil's claims before taking the case. He replied that perhaps he'd take me up on my offer to talk with him, but that they are still in the discovery phase.

His name is:

Keith L. Sachs, Esq.
Metaxas Brown Pidgeon LLP
900 Cummings Center, Suite 207T
Beverly, MA 01915

Why would a lawyer agree to take such a case? Ka-ching?

Doug Mesner did nothing wrong, imho. He went to one of those satanic panic mind control conferences and reported on it. I can understand Neil following through. But Keith Sachs? No, I don't understand.

And for those who missed it, find the time to check out that two part report by Doug Mesner. It's a brilliant read.

Report from the S.M.A.R.T. Ritual Abuse/Mind-Control Conference 2009

Report from the S.M.A.R.T. Ritual Abuse/Mind-Control Conference 2009, Part 2

No, I'm actually not a right wing operative

2011-09-20T00:14:00.001-04:00

Karl Rove is not really my uncle despite internet rumours

I don't feel too comfortable blogging about my personal situation. There is a lot going on in the background, and it's best for me not to share that. It's not that I don't want to.

Since the cybersmears are so outrageous and clearly untrue, there is no rush for me to confront them right now in a public forum. Perhaps in the future, make that probably, I will. What is being done to me, in lack of a better word, is illegal. So please be patient. All in good time. And if you can make it through my schtick below, there will be a treat at the end.

Here was my response finished mere minutes ago to Patterico's The Increasing Thuggery of the Fringe Left

There is no real left in America. I find it humorous how so many of you actually think people like Markos Moulitsas and Arianna Huffington represent the left. Or that Obama is a socialist.

The funny part of this is Patterico seems to think his blog has some form of political push or gravitas. No one cares about blogs. No one in “real life” cares what any of us think.

People go to the net for sports, stock #’s, the weather, to use email, etc..

Maybe most of you think the people cybersmearing me are part and parcel of this so-called fringe left or simply left as someone put it. No, they are not. Not even close.

If I had to guess, the people who helped force Weiner into resigning are simply on another Democrat’s payroll or of the old boy’s headquarters. Those aren’t the left. Have you never heard of triangulation?

That convolution, imho, is becoming clearer by the day. And you’re falling into the trap by succumbing to the same old same old libtard versus repukelican script.

Obama’s gonna get re-elected. His job bill was a masterful political move. Now Bill Clinton has come out with some opinions. Your only chance for conservative ideology to succeed politically is to also triangulate yourselves. If you don’t move to the left and soon, forget it. You won’t be winning the Presidency again for a very long time.

So keep yapping like know-it-alls of how evil the left is, and you’ll find yourselves more and more aligned with the fringe on the right.

You should be pushing for Ron Paul. Better yet, you need to find someone with a similar antiwar platform who doesn’t seem as nutty with everything else.

People want jobs. They want low taxes for regular people. They don’t want cuts in health care, schools, road repairs, you name it. The right historically has whined so much about spending, but take a good look at how much national debt was amassed under Reagan, Bush, and Bush. Look at how under Clinton, the budget deficit was drastically reduced and perhaps eliminated, and a plan was on its way to start paying off the national debt. It is because of Clinton that interest rates started to drop. The only reason they dropped under Bush was because they had nothing left in which to prop up their illegal war economy.

Most of you seem to be preaching to your own ever diminishing choir. You better hope voting apathy continues. Because the more people are registered, the more likely it is the Republican Party eventually branches off. Right now the Democratic Party is a blend of Republican and Democrat. The Republicans as constituted are turning into the main stream fringe.

You guys need to wake up and smell the inequality and collective fear for the future. People are tired of high unemployment. You may actually lose Florida. It’s been close of late. You guys are living in a plastic bubble if you actually believe things are looking good for your party’s political prospects.

People are sick of both parties. They are sick of these word games. They are tired of the Patterico’s of the world blabbing about the fringe left.

The dude’s a prosecutor in Los Angeles. He has more dogma than academic background. I just found out Breitbart is basically a regular guy for an extreme right winger who’s found 15 minutes of fame. I heard his bloggers aren’t even paid. He’s a big fish in a small pond, bigger than most of us, but not really in the grand scam of social reality. I’m telling you, this libtard versus repukelican noise pollution act has gotten beyond stale. No one is listening, and no one cares.

Treat Time: For those looking for some good entertainment, check out my youtube page. God bless the audience. p:>

1,676 likes, 14 dislikes

Time to Batten Down the Hatches

2011-08-26T16:40:00.000-04:00

Fasten your seat belts, it's going to be a bumpy night.

It looks like we're about to get battered by Hurricane Irene. This blog recently got nailed by Hurricane WTF. Due to an inability to raise funds, quite a number of entries were deleted. Free speech is not available for the poor. That's my conclusion.

Nonetheless, everything has been saved. I do expect to find a way to fight back against this injustice. Due to obvious reasons, I am not able to share details at this time.

So where does that leave this blog? I'm not exactly sure. I am happy the bulk of it survived. I do expect to be able to restore the lost information, i.e. facts and opinion based on facts, sometime in the future.

I found a nifty gadget. Now the latest posts can be accessed. That will make it easier to dust off archive rust.

I'm still suffering from a bit of writer's block. Nothing's really inspiring me to post new stuff. And I have to take care of real life concerns before jumping back into the fray.

By the way, those deleted entries can still be found through google cache. Just search site:davefromqueens2.blogspot.com and add the ex-con's name. Though I'm sure he'll try to get those erased too. The truth hurts.

I almost got that top Margo Channing quote wrong. Like many, I thought Bette's line was bumpy ride not night. According to this link, that is one of the seven most misquoted movie lines of all time.

The Socratisation of the West Memphis 3

2011-08-20T07:51:00.002-04:00

'West Memphis 3' freed in child killings after 18 years

What my tens of thousands or tens of readers miss out on are new comments which periodically funnel into the back pages of the DFQ2 archives.

One such comment was dropped this very early A.M..

That can be located on this thread.

Here was my response. I thought snark-wise, it was off the charts. By the way, this might be the first time in my blogging history, I've actually used the word snark. I've never liked it. Schtick? That's a great word. Though it could be near its retirement age. Even the greatest fads have a shelf life. I used to wear earrings before it was popular for dudes to do so. Then just mere years later, nearly every bloke on every street corner had pierced ears. That's when I stopped wearing them. Thankfully I never got a tattoo. Though I used to wear those found in Cracker Jack boxes.

This is the response I cranked out to that barely skimmed through post.

Starduster,

For one, your all capital letter rant is unreadable. No one cares when they see words put together like that.

From a quick googling, I see you don't matter one bit. You get published by some rag called Rumor Mill News. That is equivalent to supermarket tabloids which speak of Elvis' love child with an alien.

It's kind of fitting you show up now, considering the lads from West Memphis were finally released after losing so many years of their lives to the Satanic Panic, one that you and Ted Doucherson promoted.

That he worked for the FBI, that implies some sort of internet cointelpro. Or maybe you are simply batshit insane.

No one is listening to you, and no one cares. So go bugger off, you wanker.

One topic that's hit its expiration date is the Satanic Panic. I'm not saying to completely fugedaboutit. I'm saying the Satanic Panic has reached the level of "The World is Flat" theory; Though it may have a bit of distance to make it to "The moon is made out of cheese" territory. No one's buying it anymore except for perhaps some dumbass Italians who went after Amanda Knox. Hopefully Amanda won't have to wait 18 years for her freedom like the West Memphis 3.

The plea agreement for their release is beyond ridiculous. Basically, they have been forced to admit the State did no wrong in prosecuting and incarcerating them for all these years. It's called an "Alford plea." I call it dumbass pigs trying to save face.

I don't think one has to do much research of this case to know a travesty of injustice occurred.

*** BREAKING NEWS ***

We Interrupt This Socratisation Of The West Memphis 3 To Report That Suspected Internet Cointelpro Leader And Confirmed Nutjob Ted Gunderson Has Passed Away At Age 82.

Former Memphis FBI chief Gunderson dies

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (AP) - The son of former FBI special agent Ted Gunderson, who was head of the bureau's office in Memphis during a long career, says his father has died at the age of 82....

*** THAT'S IT FOR BREAKING NEWS. WE NOW RETURN TO REGULARLY SCHEDULED BLOGGING AND THE SOCRATISATION OF THE WEST MEMPHIS 3 ***

I was trying to say before being rudely interrupted by myself that one could have simply looked at two people on opposite sides of this topic and realise the truth from intuition.

Johnny Depp believed in the innocence of the West Memphis 3. Ted Gunderson was at the forefront of spreading Satanic Panic hysteria. Who you gonna believe, Depp or Gunderson? It's a no-brainer. If anything, check out Gunderson's sunburned mug. Could he have possibly got that from paying a visit to..... Satan?

Or picture yourself in Oz. I don't mean Australia. I mean the real Oz, er, the real fake Oz.

Who of the following are you gonna lean on for love, guidance, and the truth?

Johnny Depp was a good jake for sticking up for the West Memphis 3.

Cross-Post Action

2011-08-05T12:06:00.000-04:00

I just dropped this beaut at Patterico's.

Hi to all the nice people. I don’t break bread with anyone else.

I’m not sure if this post will even be seen. Are ye going for the Guinness Book of Records or what?

I’d appreciate it if my real name isn’t used. It’s not that it makes a big difference at this point, but I never outed myself. That was originally done by Brad Friedman. I thought journalists weren’t supposed to rat out sources. Oops, I guess I should have put the word journalist in quotes.

I have not one thing to do with this story you’re discussing. You all know that anyway. Even the folks feigning insanity realise this.

Sure I’m from the Boston area. Oops again. I come from Titletown USA!

How ’bout them Red Sox? You ready for Ocho Cinco joining up with Tom Brady? If only the Bruins could win the Stanley Cup. Oops once more.

I don’t use sock puppets. I did go to graduate school. Sorry if that makes me sound like a pompous jackass. My point is that I was trained in how to follow academic principles. Those don’t allow for defamation or any other forms of lying.

I never cyberstalked anyone. There was no defamation or libel on my part. It’s not my fault I do not have the protectiob of a newspaper. If Kimberlin gets away with deleting my blog, it shows that freedom of speech is dead on the internet, as dead as Carl Delong and Julia Scyphers.

There’s also a much higher bar for proving defamation and libel if the spoken words were applied to a public figure. Under the definition of such is where Brett Kimberlin resides.

I don’t believe I am a public figure. Even if somehow I have become one, it still doesn’t give anyone the right to cybersmear me with outrageous lies.

I notice Alexandrovna has seemingly bowed out of participation in the internet zeitgeist. I guess that’s a smart move to make. It’s tough to have credibility as a journalist after vouching for Brett Kimberlin as an exonerated ex-political prisoner.

And by the way, people need to stop saying Kimberlin sold pot. He was a major drug smuggler. Big difference.

I’m not proofreading this, so if there are any typos or bad writing, I’m sorry. But I refuse to apologise for living in Titletown USA. and I’m not going to say there I said it.

It's been a while

2011-07-31T02:00:00.001-04:00

This is the first time I've checked into this forum in many months. I expected it to have been deleted. Brett Kimberlin made a motion for that to happen. It still could. Right now, I haven't a clue.

I tried to get an attorney. One told me it would cost 50 grand to fight back, and that there was no way to counter-sue.

He's a top-notch lawyer, so I don't doubt it.

I decided to not pay anybody for anything, and if by chance the court was stupid enough to decide in the lowlife's favour, no matter what the amount, I'd never pay that ex-con one cent.

You see, no one lives forever. I might be a nobody who was foolish enough to believe I could make it as a blogger. I tried. In terms of capitalism, I failed. In terms of speaking truth to numbnuts, I was a phenomenal success.

There are ten comments waiting in moderation. I can only imagine what they are. Most of them are probably from stalker trolls. Hopefully one or two were from nice people like The Last Name Left. If so, I'll allow them.

When I am about to breathe my last breath, I'll do so with the awareness that I didn't cause anyone's death. The Speedway Bomber cannot say the same. If this forum is deleted, so be it. But if it isn't, I'll try to shake the sawdust out of my eyes and figure out what the frick happened. I'll let you know, if DFQ2 survives.

Right Woos Black

2011-04-07T18:33:00.005-04:00

There's this "blogger" Alicia Banks who writes the craziest stuff. She purports to be a lefty rebel into advancing the cause of black folks, but in actuality she is a conspiracy theory freak merely posing as a revolutionary thinker. Three of her favourite people are Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, and William Cooper. She refers to the President as Hobama and is one of those so-called birthers.

She is the black version of a Kathaksung, which according to the Urban Dictionary is a paranoid, conspiracy theorist being pursued by the Feds.

Now this wouldn't be that big a deal, if it weren't for its soiling of the Field Negro blog.

That one is run by Wayne Bennett, a Philadelphia attorney who specialises with the city's family courts.

He's even had a glowing write up by the Los Angeles Times.

Blogger goes into 'the fields'

I would never have heard of him, if he hadn't been a regular contributor to Maryscott O'Connor's My Left Wing.

Some have complained to him about the need for the comment sections to be cleaned up. He doesn't care. He has a few excuses or plausible deniability for letting his blog rot. He's into free speech. He feels it is best for idiocy to have a mirror on itself. He feels his blog is consistently growing, so crazy posts in his comment sections aren't hurting it. People can scroll past them. Those kinds of points.

He fancies himself as a field negro rather than a house negro. The former work in the trenches and fight for freedom and equality. The latter work in the kitchen or various parts of the house kissing up to Mr. Whitey.

I believe by allowing his blog to rot in the comment sections, Mr. Bennett is more of a house negro Uncle Tom than a true leader. He has done nothing to maintain a format by which progressives and civil conservatives can post in peace. He may think getting a lot of page hits is a sign of success, but he's wrong.

The internet is dead, because good people like Field Negro have done nothing to create areas by which freedom of speech and association can grow and make a true difference. Mountains of troll spam and noise are not indicative of freedom of speech and association.

Just yesterday he fought back against this obvious truth his blog has become a colossal failure. Look, the cat's actual blog entries are quite good. He's a nice guy. But as a blog owner and moderator, he is one of the worst of all time.

Papa is a rolling stone. (No, not Mick Jagger)

Oh, and before I go. Shout out to the folks at "The Root" for featuring this blog in their "30 Bloggers You Should Know" segment. That was field Negro behavior on their part.

BTW, the thing folks liked the most about this blog is the comments section. That means all of you, the folks who not only lurk but brave the unpredictable and precarious comments section in the fields.

I don't care that I'm yet again being accused of sock puppetry I've had nothing to do with. I'm not upset I got trolled on by idiots who are either insane or paid fakes. But I do mind that Field Negro has turned out to be just another self-important, deluded anything but a true leader blogger. His allowing of his blog to literally suck is just one more nail into the fact that the internet is dead as a vehicle for positive social change.

He couldn't be more wrong about his comment sections being unpredictable. It is the same day in day out. Usually the first part of it is bearable and at times informative. But by the end it turns into the ugly (and agent provocateur styled) Alicia Banks Show. The woman is either crazy or paid to post, period. Either way, the result is the same. The Field Negro blog is a pitiful waste of time other than the main entries.

Nuclear Catastrophe In Japan And Are Astroturfers All Over Yahoo?

2011-03-17T03:13:00.001-04:00

Japan nuclear crisis escalates

Yahoo has implemented a new moderator tool to hide anti-social posts, but it now appears that sytem is being gamed by internet fakes.

Here's one article with a few brief excerpts.

U.S. shows growing alarm over Japan nuclear crisis By Jeff Mason and Tom Doggett

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States showed increasing alarm about Japan's nuclear crisis on Wednesday and urged its citizens to stay clear of an earthquake-crippled power plant, going further in its warnings than Japan itself....

A United Nations forecast projects the radioactive plume from the Fukushima facility would reach the Aleutian Islands on Thursday and hit Southern California late on Friday, The New York Times reported.

This is how the new yahoo system works for public comments. Those which get the most thumbs up are shown first. In theory, this is a splendid idea. However, like with the Daily Kos' similar approach, it is clearly opened to the prospect of being manipulated. What some may assume is community moderating could actually be a rigged platform. I'm not saying Yahoo is doing the rigging. I think they have nothing to do with the voting.

Here are the first ten results, all sounding the same and very pro-nuclear power. What are the odds? I'd say beyond the laws of probability.

William Randolph Hearst: One of the big problems in the US today is that there is too much media with too much air time to fill. These"reporters" are always talking about things they know nothing about. Sensational headlines are the norm.

George: Jackass! Retire already!

Scott B: Why do we always have to have knee jerk reactions to everything that happens these days?

John: We should be full steam ahead. No waiting on Nuclear, we should have been here years ago. We know they will be located on land bought and sold by congressman, but we should still be proceeding.

Dicky: Well mr LIEberman which is it, CO2 free nuclear power, or CO2 petroleum which you say is causing global warming and that a cap and tax on the US and Europe, (not China, or India) will not only line carbon gangsters pockets, but will start the global cooling cycle and cool and heal the plane

TexasRebel: Lieberman needs to shut his big yappy muzzle and do some research on Integral Fast Reactors and then do all he can to get some of them built. IFRs are a much safer reactor design and their waste is about 1/20 (or less) as radioactive as the current reactors. Reagan funded a prototype unit in '84, but Clinton shut it down in 1994 when it was almost completed. It cost more to end the project than it would have to finish it.

W.: Since 1979 here, so much has changed! Maybe time to retire... How much can we afford to pay for Electric,Gas Food? Wind is good as long as wind BLOWS!Ask any sailor...WE NEED FUEL NOW! Not 20,30 years! Get yor your @#$% together! NOW, NOW ,NOW!! Just don't build them along major fault lines! Duh...

Ted: This idiot is what's wrong with washington! We have never had a death from nuclear power in the USA including our nuclear powered navy our guy's have lived in submarines with a nuclear power plant for 50 yrs. We don't have to put ours on the ocean shoreline or in a earthquake prone area.

dave1971: Wow, another politician with a knee-jerk reaction, go figure....Thank god we have such "leaders"...Go back to sleep joe, we'll wake you up for your next fundraiser.

barry: Yup and the next time somebody has a car accident, everybody stop driving. He needs to go. If you aren't part of the solution you are part of the problem.

Another drawback to this new Yahoo system is that replies made to each of those from the top ten list aren't seen unless someone clicks on them. Those might be getting gamed also but it would take further time to confirm. If someone has the time, they might want to compare replies to the top rated posts with those much further below. If a tree falls in the forest, do astroturfers care if it's heard by merely a few?

What Happened To Larisa Alexandrovna?

2011-03-15T23:00:00.000-04:00

Larisa Alexandrovna

A week ago I noticed Larisa's blog atlargely.com wasn't loading. I figured let's wait some days and see if it returns. It hasn't. The last article I see is from March 3rd. It pertained to allegations Bradley Manning was stripped naked for seven hours. The authorities say he is being protected from himself attempting suicide. I don't know.

Anyway, looking at atlargely's whois record, I noticed two things. Her registration doesn't expire until November 19th, 2011. There was also a change made on March 2nd. What that was, I don't know. However, the timing of that with the appearance she made her last post the next day seems highly unlikely of being a coincidence.

Maybe she has deleted her website for good? Maybe she is just cleaning it up or giving it a new look? I honestly don't know. I look around for any information on what's up with her of late, and there is no available information from what I've seen. It could be she doesn't want her stories on Michael Connell to be easily read.

In December 2008 she wrote, "One Of My Sources Died In A Plane Crash Last Night." Looking at the cache of her articles with the tag of Michael Connell, I don't see it. A copy of it can be read here.

If you follow the first link above, it takes you to an interview she did with Heyoka Magazine. They wrote:

Larisa Alexandrovna was the first to report that the US-UK began an illegal pre-war bombing campaign of Iraq, that former CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson was working on WMD proliferation in Iran at the time her cover was blown, that the US Department of Defense was working with a terrorist organization - the MEK - in order to de-stabilize Iran, and that US forces had detained roughly seventy thousand Iraqi and Afghan nationals since the beginning of military operations post-911.

It would be nice to see some proof of those claims.

If this website gets deleted, it won't be because I pulled the switch. It will be because the Speedway Bomber might succeed in getting it whitewalled or at least my entries that reference him.

Unfortunately for him, the truth cannot be deleted.

I am the Luckiest Man on the Planet (Part 2)

2011-03-09T17:31:00.000-05:00

(image found through cashunclaimed)

Part one can be found here.

I received this letter from Canada without a return address. I'm thinking what the fricken sassa frassa but decided to open it. The first thing I see is a check. What? It looked legit. It was from Bank of America for $3,875.

Here's some of what the letter with the check said. It's times like this I wish I had a scanner.

Promotions Manager
Prize and Award Presentation
Dominion Investment Securities Inc.
77 King St. W Toronto Ont. M5W 1P9 Canada

PRIZE CLAIM/FINAL NOTIFICATION

Sir/Madam,

We are pleased to inform you that you are one of the declared winners of the SHOPPERS SWEEPSTAKE LOTTERY conducted in North America....

We have made many unsuccessful attempts to contact you regarding this winning. You are therefore entitled to the sum of $125,000.00 US DOLLARS. This is from total prize money of $3 MILLION US DOLLARS that was shared and presented among the other 24 declared winners. Please note that all the participants were selected through a random computer ballot system drawn from over 50,000 names in [the] UNITED STATES, CANADA AND UNITED KINGDOM....

To expediate the processing enclosed is the check of $3,875.00 US dollars which has been deducted from your winning. The sole purpose of this check is for the payment of applicable Government taxes on your big winnings. Government taxes cannot be deducted from the winning amount because of the insurance policy coverage. The tax amount is $2,875.00 US DOLLARS... to be paid directly to the tax agent.

Please do not attempt to use this check until you call. We urge you to keep this winning CONFIDENTIAL until your claim has been processed and your cash remitted to you as this is part of our security protocol and to avoid double claiming or unscrupulous acts by non participants taking advantage of this program....

(Claim Agent) MR. GEORGE ATWELL, 1-905-781-8865

Congratulations,

Yours Truly

Bryan Mcloud (Promotion Manager)

I could have used that money. I definitely got a few goose bumps when I first saw the check. Then after reading the letter, I was like ugh, this can't be legit. Why is the tax amount so low? Why don't I remember entering this sweepstake? I've never bought anything through the internet. Why can't they pay the taxes? Because of an insurance policy coverage? That doesn't make any sense. Who is this tax agent they speak of? That wouldn't be someone on their own payroll, would it? They want this to be kept hushed due to their security protocol? I think they don't want people discussing this with family and friends who will splash cold water on their faces and say, "Snap out of it!"

(image found through Celluloid Soul Mates)

Then I went to the googler and found people saying this is a scam. Apparently if you try to cash the check, you won't get any funds from it. They probably finish the job over the phone by imploring folks there is a time deadline to get the rest of the prize. They are probably looking for folks with well over the money they are asking for who will send them the $2,875 while expecting the check to eventually clear, which it never does.

I also see that others have the same claim number I was given. Thus, I conclude they are targeting folks who will be so taken in with the idea of receiving big money, that they won't look into seeing whether this is legit or not. It was pretty crafty of them to come up with a name that sounds like a real banking institution.

What I don't understand is that this has been going on for a while. Why are these people still able to do this? Why haven't they been charged with fraud? Sure, I'll feel like a loser if this turns out to be legit, and I just threw away 125 grand because I didn't believe it. Yet I doubt that will happen. Such fraud is despicable. Why aren't the Canadian authorities putting an end to this? I feel sorry for anyone who has thrown away over two thousand dollars to these confidence men. Many could be elderly folks looking for funds to help with health care or to make the last chapters of their lives easier. Someone needs to put a stop to this.

Death by Internet in Arizona

2011-01-23T04:14:00.001-05:00

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-AZ, seen in this June 21, 2007 file photo.
UPI/Roger L. Wollenberg/FILE

I've definitely lost the blogging bug. If it weren't for a few good people popping in over the last year, I would've chilled out a lot sooner. It just all seems so very pointless.

It was bad enough to find out the major "lefty" boards had unfair, moderating procedures. That made it impossible to discuss on those actual sites why they were being more a mirror of fascism than old-fashioned, goody two-shoed progressiveness. There was no way to change the blogging system from within.

Now seeing all these nutjobs from Von Brunn to Joe Stack to Loughner coming out of the woodwork and creating violence, the whole enchilada has become downright nasty and creepy.

I'm not saying folks shouldn't be proud of their pissing into the wind efforts. It hasn't really been that insignificant either. I do believe in pockets of awareness and perhaps even a collective consciousness.

There will always only be the few who get it. The 100th monkey will not be walking through that cyber door. There will be no revolution. 1984 has won. We are born, we do what we do, and then we die.

I believe there is a soul which goes with our bodies. After death, the soul enters a newborn body as in reincarnation. I can't prove this. But no one can prove it isn't true either.

In short, there is spiritual and material. Internet nutjobs who self-imploded had become too attached to the rotten world we live in through cyberspace. They soaked in conspiracy theory and took it far too seriously. If we had access to their biographies, we could probably put two and two together.

They had to be lacking in the basics that go beyond food and shelter. I'm talking about love and education. Loughner couldn't have been in love or else he'd never have thrown away his or others' lives. Same with Joe Stack and Von Brunn. They each bought into crap that's been posted all over the internet.

a younger, more innocent Loughner

Thankfully, it doesn't seem like he's going to flip out and cause violence and mayhem. However, for every Larry who can keep it real within his own fragmented spirit, there are probably more Loughners out there germinating into menaces to society.

All we can do is try to be good and keep reaching for love and enlightenment. Maybe once things hit rock bottom, the government will be forced to push left. We can hope so. We can be ready when it happens to do our part in helping real lives. That will have nothing to do with the internet.

Unless someone can come up with an earlier example, I think I've found the first instance of death by internet. His name was Steve Kangas.

first official case of death by internet?

I socratised his story. Seeing that the reader decides, it's up to each of us to come to terms with social reality. You can agree with my conclusions, disagree, not care either way, or come up with your own perspective.

He had become a lefty after being a conservative. He had been in the military. He was a big time blogger in the usenet days. He was kind of the original Dave From Queens. Though I think Dave was in full control of his faculties and definitely could have eventually become Mayor of New York City. There are few and far in between potential leaders like Dave Weintraub was. His early death was similar to John Lennon or MLK dying young. We can only wonder what if they had lived.

I'm not saying Dave would have ended up an icon like those two, but you never know.

a great man

I think Dave's downfall was going on a crash diet. His heart couldn't handle it. I don't believe Dave was unhinged in his going after Daily Kos trolls. They deserved to be exposed, and Dave was the one who got it done.

Old-school movie legend Laird Cregar died at age 28
after undergoing a crash diet

Not only that, Dave had a body of work that transcended his internet experience. He did street theatre. He confronted Hannity's boy Mark Levin at book signings.

I'm not seeing the same accomplishments out of Steve Kangas. I believe his claim to fame was being a prolific blogger and nothing else. Dave was an attorney activist. He was not anal retentive with conspiracy theories, but he didn't go into them either. He was going to allow one day a week where people could get into it at DFQ. Nonetheless, Dave was not a conspiracy theorist, just an old-school liberal angry with what his beloved Daily Kos had turned into.

Kangas, on the other hand, by the end became a flaming conspiracy theorist. Now of course there is much to be exposed concerning the CIA, the Military-Industrial Complex, etc.. However, Kangas became kind of unhinged with it from what I can see via archives.

Kangas' similarities with Dave pertained to how they both had gone after right wing media. Steve's primary target was Richard Mellon Scaife. Kangas was found shot dead in the bathroom of Scaife's office building.

Some conspiracy theorists would like us to believe it was a hit by Scaife. No, from what I've gathered, Kangas had bought the gun in question and killed himself. He had traveled far to get to that building with said weapon. I read one explanation on the JREF forum which makes a lot of sense.

Kangas was so messed up his plan was to murder Scaife. When no opportunity for that arose, he killed himself out of embarrassment or self-pity.

I admit this blog entry was mailed in. I'm just not so into this anymore. Yeah, there have been cycles in the past, lulls turning into more writing. I just don't feel I will ever get back into the swing of blogging anywhere near as much as I have in the past.

The Last Name Left has been blogging a bit on Jared Loughner. His recent entry is titled, "Loughner was member at conspiracy forum - AboveTopSecret." A conspiracy theory freak named Larry showed up and blabbed about myself thinking JFK was killed by a conspiracy. He was trying to make some point with TLNL. Personally, I don't have any desire to interact with that person. TLNL yes. He's a nice, thoughtful person from Wales. Larry writes some of the most vile things. He's what is referred to as a troll. He used to get published by Alex Jones. Anyone that cares for more context on him, you can check out my National Wingnut Appreciation Day thread. Here is the exchange we had at The Last Blog Left. I won't edit the posts but will chop some down for clearer reading.

Larry: So believing in conspiracies makes you dangerous? Your buddy Socrates believes in the JFK conspiracy. I guess he was involved in the Loughner shooting right?

You're a boob

Me: The point is people who are fixated on conspiracy theories like you Larry are potentially more dangerous than the everyday, common slob.

You were taken to the woodshed a long time ago, and it's no longer necessary to debate anything with your gutter breath mouth. You prominently link to Rense, Illuminati this and that, and tons of other crap.

Conspiracy as a word is legit. Conspiracy as in how people like you sound like nutjobs is not.

From what I briefly read, TLNL, it appears Loughner was one of those NASA fakes Moon and Mars landings. I'm not sure.

I do know that one picture of him as a skinhead says plenty. Sure there are some good skinheads, as in people who like to shave their heads and aren't racist.

Maybe Larry and his ilk stick up for that kind of guy because they are almost looking into the mirror of their own thinking processes.

Someone made a good point on another forum. Loughner wasn't a lefty. He was more of the gold nut types coming out of Rivero and Alex Jones with a spice of Above Top Secret.

It's not that there aren't crazies on the left too. It's just obvious where the violent trends are being pushed, which is on the right, as you have a keen awareness of.

I'm burned out from blogging. It seems like an utter waste of time. It doesn't even seem that fun as a hobby anymore. But if I get a new entry up, I am going to touch on this Loughner story. Not much, because it's already been done to the hilt. I found another story of death by internet, maybe one of the first. The guy was on the left after changing from the Republican side of things. The point is, these events transcend politics in that the individuals are not in control of their faculties. Yet they don't transcend politics in that it's easily shown where they have been getting the gumption to go crazy with violence. That comes from the right.

Larry: So, would Thomas Jefferson or James Madison have shot Giffords? They believed in the gold standard too---thats why they included it in the Constitution, you dickweed!

(on my skinhead schtick) Your point is? Or do you just like hearing yourself talk?

(on being taken to the woodshed and on his gutter mouth) Oh really, I was??? When was I "taken to the woodshed"??? Care to enlighten me on that? "no longer necessary to debate"----lol. Translation: Because I have taken YOU and the last asshole left to the woodshed! Look at my story about Andy Ostroy on my blog. Proof the "LEFT" indulge in hate rhetoric as well! TLNL has AVOIDED my story.

(on being told he has a similar mind to conspiracy theory freaks like Loughner) WHEN did I stick up for him?? Im listening. Because we support his right to have a gun because the 2nd amendment does too????? Youre INSANE.

(on how freaks like him are potentially more dangerous than everyday slobs like myself) Proof of that?? Of course you dont! The 9-11 inside job belief is a FAR-LEFT view [considered far left]. Funny how you say its RIGHT wing when almost all 9-11 truth people HATE Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and every other right wing person in his administration. And I constantly write stories condemning these assholes----but dont let THAT deter you from calling me RIGHT wing!

Most 9-11 truth people consider CHENEY behind it all---but according to you, they are RIGHT wing...LOL.

(You can go to the thread linked to above and read the whole thing for yourselves. I refuse to copy and paste his quotes of me. It's spam. I try not to quote people when I'm interacting with them. I used to. It now seems kind of pointless. There are plenty of posts on that thread I won't be pasting on this entry.)

Larry: Socrates is allowed to believe in at least ONE conspiracy, and he's still perfectly normal. But if I believe in 5 or 6, Im "nuts" right?

Me: I believe in three topics which would be considered conspiracy theory- the JFK Assassination, chemtrails, and that there are fake posts being put all over the internet for various, insidious objectives.

There's a big difference between myself and Larry's form of conspiracy thinking. Anyone can check out my chemtrail board and see where I'm coming from, what arguments and whatnot I have presented. They can see I tried to be logical and back things up with proof.

The JFK Assassination is definitely not an off the wall conspiracy theory.

It has also been shown that Air Force intelligence and others are into posting on the net. They say they will be upfront when they do so, but who knows.

There's Netvocates, the Rendon Group, Advantage Consultants, and a number of other firms who have been exposed astroturfing. Some of their clients are military and government.

Larry on the other hand is a raging lunatic when it comes to conspiracy theory postulating.

With such a gutter mouth to go with his naivety, he doesn't realise that most people don't bother reading such unhinged rubbish.

TLNL, I'm just totally bored with blogging at this point.

Most blogs and guests are too stupid. Good people got driven off the major boards. There are too many trolls and stupid posts. I know you don't like the word troll, but I can't think of a better one.

Larry: so, if the next shooter believes in chemtrails, can we blame YOU Socrates??

Ahhh yes, but NO PROOF whatsoever for that statement. I have denunked EVERYTHING you cumturds have said....everything! This is why TLNL has IGNORED all of my stories on Loughner---he cant defend who I condemn in my stories.

Me: Cumturds? And you're not a latent homosexual? Dickweed, cum, faggots, you sure do post a lot of homosexual imagery. Studies show you are a closeted homosexual. You basically hate yourself.

You are the poster child for why certain people should not be on the internet. You're completely fucked up.

I don't discuss anything with foul-mouthed scum like yourself. It's not because you're uneducated. It's because you're anti-social and deranged.

In my new blog entry I just wrote that thankfully you don't seem to be someone who will commit violence. Now I'm not so sure.

Don't even bother responding to it when it finally gets posted. I don't understand why TLNL let's you shit on his blog. I mean I do. He's into free speech or something. But even he has had to delete your posts because they got too toxic.

Seek some mental health help, Larry. I think when you come to terms with being a homosexual, you'll be much more relaxed and maybe even find your true love afterall. I pity any woman who ends up your wife. Jerk.

Captain Kirk, Huey Long, FakeLeft, and Shame

2011-01-05T18:44:00.000-05:00

Ebony and Ivory live together in perfect harmony.
Side by side on my piano keyboard, Oh lord, why don't we?
We all know that people are the same wherever you go...

William Shatner has an unfair reputation for being a ham actor. His name plus ham plugged into the googler returns over 44 thousand hits. What many people might not realise is he was trained as a Shakespearean actor.

I stumbled across a little-known classic of his which is now in the public domain. It will be embedded at the end of this post. It is a must see movie. It should be shown in every high school civics class. It is similar to Salt of the Earth, in that it reached a level of leftier than thouism that yours truly can only dream of attaining. It showed the connection between racism and inequality. Both movies did not do well in the box office. Both are classics despite having had low budgets and employing local, untrained residents as actors to work along some proven actors. It is a mix that worked.

Shatner's character would have never kissed Uhura. He played a Huey Long type racist, using oratory skills to manipulate the unwashed, white masses. He used doublespeak. It was the African-Americans who were the threat to their way of life and not unhealthy, inorganic bigotry. He drooled out that Washington was encroaching on their freedoms by forcing integration. Shatner preached to the rednecks that it was their responsibility to protect the whitey American way of life from Jooos and communists.

It's a very unsettling movie. The N word is utilised throughout clearly showing why those who hate its naked ugliness are not hiding behind skirts of political correctness. It is a word that shouldn't be thrown around too often.

looks can be deceiving

There's an odd internet poster who goes by the handle fairleft. He should really call himself fakeleft, or failreft as the donkeytale troll refers to him via the misspellicism schtick.

Fairleft describes Richard Nixon as the last liberal President. He is vehemently anti-immigration, to the point of proudly linking to rightwing sources with racist and neo-fascist ties.

The strangest fake leftiness coming out of him has to be with revisionism concerning Huey Long. Talk about right woos left. Here are a couple links proving how that dude is anything but on the left.

Share the Wealth Now, Obama

Fact: Huey pressured FDR from the left

Eric S. as sid's buddy did an excellent job debunking fairleft's disgusting glorification of Huey Long. As did donkeytale.

The first link clearly shows Pffugeecamp jumping the shark. Strangely enough the blog owner was in agreement with fairleft insinuating that all the negatives written about Huey Long have been merely smear attacks. When they couldn't beat Eric through debate, they made up unproven crap about him having peddled pedophilia. I quit Pffugee for a long time due to that. I returned quite a bit recently. I again ponder if I should go cold turkey and never look back. Eventually that blog will probably be whitewalled anyway. So read those threads while they're still available is what I'm suggesting, in order to understand how fake left ideology gets spewed on fake, lefty boards.

true colours

HUEY P. LONG: BAYOU FASCISM? by Lance Hill (excerpts)

It would be safe to assume that Long was forging a mass petty-bourgeois organization beyond his old constituency. Given that the adult population of the U.S. was roughly 55 million then, the 7,550,000 people on the SOWS mailing list reflect the seriousness of the movement's scope. Coupled with Huey's own personal newspaper, American Progress (peak subscription of 375,000), the Long propaganda machine presented one of the most formidable challenges to traditional bourgeois rule in the thirties.

Sitting at the administrative head of this organization was Reverend Gerald L. K. Smith. Smith was handpicked by Huey to head up SOWS, and the young radical preacher from Shreveport took up his duties with the passion of a true zealot.

He was an extremely capable organizer, in many ways the actual organizational mind of SOWS. He and Huey had extensive contact, although Smith's servile devotion to his new-found deity sometimes rubbed the Kingfish the wrong way.

Often described as a LaFollette Progressive, only a few admit that Smith was a militant anti-Semite and fascist thinker before he joined Huey's organization. Only a year before, Smith had written America's self-pronounced fuehrer, William Dudley Pelley, offering to help set up America's first fascist "silver shirts."

Some historians ruminate that Smith put aside these politics temporarily during his tenure as SOWS head. The suggestion is absurd. Smith later became a stalwart in the anti-Semitic, racist right-wing organizations agitating against the civil rights movement. Both apologists and detractors of Long are increasingly reluctant to concede that one of the largest mass organizations of the thirties was administered by an anti-Semitic fascist.

The view of many of Long's contemporaries that his movement constituted a left-wing insurgency has prevented many historians from identifying Huey with fascism as an ideology. But the European experience is replete with examples of fascist movements coming to power on populist-sounding programs with significant left-wing factions operating within them.

The example of Mussolini is enlightening since his transformation from Marxist leader to fascist ideologue paralleled the movement of large numbers of socialists into the fascist ranks. Also the Italian experience did not emphasize the anti-Semitism of the Nazis, nor was it particularly concerned with programs and ideology.

As Arendt shows in her book, all the fascist movements spent tremendous energy trying to deny they ever promoted progressive-sounding programs, since the actual tasks of salvaging capitalism demanded the opposite....

It defies all logic why there is still a debate over whether Huey was a white supremacist. He ruled a state that subjugated Blacks in virtual slavery with no political rights whatsoever. He openly proclaimed himself in favor of white-supremacist rule. The evidence that historians dredge up to substantiate their claim that Huey was a closet liberal is his apparent hesitancy to use race as an issue in his campaigns, and also the tangible benefits accruing to Blacks under the Long administration....

a kid in the trenches fighting for equality

I think this Lance Hill guy is the same one from this link.

Dr. Lance Hill

Executive Director

Southern Institute for Education and Research

Dr. Lance Hill is the Executive Director of the Southern Institute for Education and Research, a tolerance education and race relations research center based at Tulane University in New Orleans. While the Southern Institute’s primary work continues to be tolerance education, the Institute has responded to hurricane Katrina by initiating two new programs: the Katrina Research Project on Equity (KRPE), a clearinghouse on the impact of race and class in the post-Katrina recovery; and Storm Bridge Racial Healing and Reconciliation Project, a program designed to address post-Katrina racial divisions.

It's fair to say Dr. Hill has quite a bit more credibility than anonymous bloggers named fairleft, Laura, and Blues. The latter desire for history to be rewritten concerning the American form of fascism personified by Huey Long. I would not be surprised if they have posters of him emblazoned on their fake lefty walls.

Shame (1962)

Shame also known as "I Hate Your Guts" "The Intruder" is a 1962 film directed by Roger Corman starring William Shatner as a racist mystery man sent to stir trouble in a southern town that is about to integrate its high school. Roger Corman claims this is the only film of the over 300 he's produced to lose money.

I'm done with donkeytale, whether he's a paid troll or useful idiot

2011-01-02T10:48:00.001-05:00

Lately I started to see through him again. This is the guy who claimed he had been banned from Daily Kos during the 2004 primaries leading up to the election.

Yet as donkeytale at DKos, he ended up posting far into 2005. There's an early donkeytale post at DKos where he said it was his first foray into blogging. He claimed to be a 52 year old cancer survivor. Once. I've never seen him mention that. Is it another of his lies?

How could someone write extensively about the brouhaha over the 2004 elections, do all that political blogging on the election, post for at least over a half year after thar election, say this was his first time on the internet as a blogger, yet he remembers getting banned during the timeframe an operative named Petey occupied?

This is an arrogant focker. He thinks he can get away with anything. Like Karl Rove. He used to post as Petey at DKos. Petey became No Dissent Allowed. That username turned into donkeytale. Same guy. Same state of Texas. Same triangulation. Same talk of being pro anti-herd mentality except for blue dog democrat point of views. Both hate Nader. Both were anti-Dean. Similar senses of humour. Same condescension.

I should have stuck to my guns when first banning him for being perverted. My bad. But no one should have to read or listen to him, if they don't want to. The guy is pond scum. Whoever that person is in real life, he's just ahead of Karl Rove for being a good guy. He is the democratic mirror image for the neoconservatives. He is center woos left.

He didn't want the world to know he was Petey. That's because Petey admitted to having been a political consultant back in the day. Too bad.

Oh my. An unhinged person is in the DFQ2 foyer. What would Jesus do?

2010-12-27T16:51:00.000-05:00

Her name is Denise Matteau. She showed up a few days ago in this blog's archives. (here, here, and here as Freedom is Sacred.)

Increasingly I became to notice her schtick wasn't adding up. Now we get to the heart of the controversy pertaining to free speech rights on a blog like this. There's a humble DFQ2 article titled Director Ed Wood Jr. Had No Talent And Was Racist. Denise wrote the following comment. I'm not going to approve it for that thread. It's not the nature of this blog to have much activity going on in the archives. I'm notified of new posts, but regular guy and gal readers aren't. It's basically time for Denise to realise in no uncertain terms that she's not wanted in the archives. If that's anti-free speech, I'm sorry. I don't mind new, relevant posts being added anywhere at DFQ2. But I feel the need to block her posts. If she wants to post on this specific thread, fine.

She wrote,

I listened to some Amos & Andy radio pieces a long time ago. They didn't seem racist in that form because it seemed like satire on the whole racist society, but that didn't carry over to television. Maybe because we naturally put ourselves into the role of the heard voice when listening to radio dialogue, but watching a screen, we remain "other" and the character is more of an object and we hold ourselves superior. Even the rural/urban thing came into play among African-Americans with relation to Amos & Andy being declared racist, because they naturally implied acceptance of their lot in life, which is more typical of any rural culture. The urban generation certainly was tired of accepting that injustice.

White people mocking black people isn't racist?

The radio show was clearly racist. I think the tv show was too, but at least it provided work for African-American actors and cut out that black face nonsense.

(scene from All in the Family mocking those who utilise the black face schtick)

There are not enough hours in the day to afford to do a full socratisation of Denise. In short, she and I are living in two very different worlds.

She believes in Jesus. Ok. It happens. She hates gay people or thinks they are sinners. As a leftier than thou, I can't go there.

The problem is Denise recently lost her daughter, and that sad event appears to be very tied in with her proselytising demeanor. It would be cruel to add salt to her wounds. What I'm saying is, I am in a dilemma. From the few links I'll provide, it's clear one could easily call her batshit insane, a troll, or even dare say with a pinkie to the side of mouth, cointelpro.

I fit her in the Diana Napolis category. Certain people, fragile and deluded to begin with, get involved with blogging and specifically internet conspiracy theory. Such people do not need ridicule. They need the services of a very talented psychologist and possibly a medication to calm the fock down.

noted psychologist Dr. Robert Hartley
(appropriately on the left)

Her daughter died very recently.

Sojourner Faith Jackson, 34, of Florence, MA. and formerly of Grafton, MA., passed away Thursday, August 26, 2010. Born in Northhampton, MA., she was the daughter of Denise (Matteau) Jackson of Austin, TX, and Kristinn Jackson and his wife Ann Jackson of North Grafton, MA.

Faith was currently a student at UMass Amherst and was a certified yoga instructor....

That makes it very difficult for me to go after Denise the way I'd like to. She needs to realise I'm part and parcel of stinking, leftist hippies who love black people, homosexuals, and especially lesbians. That's what the leftier than thou cult demands of its membership.

Is Rosie O'Donnell a secret admirer of DFQ2's
leftier than thouism?

Here's what Denise wrote over at Rick Ross' anti-cult blog. She was posting as dsm, until Rick Ross appropriately banned her "Praise the Lord, fags are evil fockers" schtick. Right click the link for a new window and check it out. It's got plenty of crazy hate in it.

For those who would like to do their own socratising, here's an easy tip. Go to Google. Type in "site:website.com search terms" for any domain. There's no space between site: and the url and do not include the http part. I was able to track down various Denise posts at Rick Ross' forum by searching site:forum.rickross.com dsm. Here's one result.

The cult I was in was NatLFed, which ran alongside Larouche in many ways but was much larger and more deeply rooted in the college student population. Larouche's own lack of education limited his following, but NatLFed grew out of a coalescence of disaffected 60's-70's radicals out of the old SDS and Weather Underground and Black Panthers and it parasitically rode along with the Cesar Chavez movement (founder Gerry Doeden aka Gino Perente masqueraded as a Chavez-type organizer to attract the white liberal trust-fund-babies who couldn't get their elitist attitudes past Chavez's people)

Aaaah, things are starting to add up better. NatLFed stands for The National Labor Federation, and a quick looksie appears to confirm it is a cult. Now how a person goes from having hippie values to being a religious extremist and hater, you got me. I am not qualified to give Denise counseling. I recommend she chill out with her internet blogging and simultaneously find a therapist. She may not be as unhinged as Diana Napolis, but she's getting there.

There's an internet poster named Blues who has said he used to hang out with all types, from white supremacists to Black Panthers. Myself and donkeytale were starting to think he might have been in the LaRouche cult. Now I'm thinking Blues was probably a member of the National Labor Federation at some point. But I digress.

I see a new Denise comment has reached moderation. She's starting to see I am not a kindred spirit to her schtick. This one she intended to show up on the Parental Kidnapping Wave Tied to Satanic Ritual Abuse, Mind Control Schtick thread linked to above.

Excuse me, but I aplogize for starting this conversation. You twisted my remark about "eccentric" groups to claim I am referring to all "cults" as merely eccentric. I can provide links aplenty, but after your incredibly bigotted and ignorant remark about the state of Utah, I doubt you would accept reading them without twisting them, I doubt you will even read them, but will come up with some other excuse for avoiding logical, critical thought.

Nevertheless, you can go to http://neirr.org yourself (as I point out in the articles you don't want to read, and in the videos you don't want to watch, which contain quotes) and read their own description of appointing themselves to "work with" people in other groups which anyone capable of logical thinking can see means that they appoint themselves to invade other groups. You can also read in their own site that they do this at the hired request of families. They link to the safge-house site, which posts a fee of $3,000 per month.

I know you are not going to read any of this because you are a LIBERAL. And you KNOW EVERYTHING. And those people in Utah are animals in your eyes (cattle, maybe?) as are all others, but that is not racism or ignorance when it is voiced by a LIBERAL DEMOCRAT, of course not.

Soc, we are done here. Intelligent people of all backgrounds can see the facts, and will click and look and google for themselves.

You are making it very obvious that I am wasting my time and your blog space, because you clearly have no intention of challenging your own mind to think about the fact that Massachusetts has become the Berlin of the new Fascist Homeland. It's very ironic, what's more, if you really had any liberal sense, you'd consider the incredible irony of George Mather being a descendant of Cotton Mather, carrying on the family tradition the way he is.

G'day.

Cool. I mean it's cool she's gonna stop dropping posts all over the DFQ2 archives.

Related Link/Videos:

Worst Celebrity Stalkers Creep Back into Headlines (excerpt)

Celebrity stalkers have been around since movie stars first hit it big in the '20s, and they've popped up regularly in headlines and in A-lister's backyards ever since.

Here are the 10 worst celebrity stalkers ever.
....

Diana Napolis – Steven Spielberg & Jennifer Love Hewitt

Diana Napolis first got into a shoving match with Jennifer Love Hewitt's mom outside a San Diego radio station in 2002. She believed Hewitt, Steven Spielberg and other prominent Hollywood figures were part of a powerful satanic cult bent on controlling the minds of America's youth. In defense of accusations of harassment by Spielberg and Kate Capshaw, Napolis alleged that the couple had implanted a microchip (a "soul catcher") into her brain. The judge didn't budge on the claim. In 2003, Napolis was put on psychiatric medication and ordered to stay away from the stars for 10 years.

Jennifer Love Hewitt Stalker

Bill Maher exposes Mormon religion

DFQ2 Gone Kooky

2010-12-24T10:14:00.002-05:00

If there's one conspiracy theory mucho dificultad to challenge, it's the JFK Assassination. Those who try to debunk it end up either looking like a chump shill or closed-minded skeptic.

I won't cover every angle of it. There's simply too much.

Who do I think was behind the killing? Rogue CIA. It was an inside job. JFK's leftier than thou status may be overrated, but he did present a roadblock for the neocons' ancestors.

I'm not saying there aren't certain things presented by believers that couldn't be socratised. But there is simply too much that cannot be denied. The easy way out is to say kooky is as kooky does, that Oswald acted alone.

I'm not really big into wrestling. One part of it I find quite enjoyable is when the wrestlers, promoters, et al start going drama queen. There are just so many fake metal chairs to the head, quadruple bounces off the ropes, and face rakes one's eyes can take before yawning. But the over the top drama, that never gets stale when done well.

Jesse Ventura brings that kind of schtick to his conspiracy show. It makes for good entertainment. Here are some of his bad points. He includes too many strawmen on his programs. He also tends to overhype his investigative team coming up with new info, when in fact he's merely regurgitating what most already know or is available elsewhere. Yet, he is fairly good at not getting too kooky.

Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura JFK assassination deathbed confession part 1

The first segment is tough to accept as proof though possibly true. I find it tough to believe Jesse Ventura has become the Julian Assange of television. Some guy in a wheelchair hands Jesse documents alleged as classified. He says a CIA agent gave them to him years ago, when he had been working on the story.

The documents, according to Jesse, speak of an Operation 40 plan to assassinate JFK, because he wouldn't give them a second chance to kill Castro, invade Cuba, or whatnot after the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Kennedy would be shot, and Castro would take the blame leading to his own demise. That kind of makes sense and would line up with Oswald's claim of being a patsy.

Ventura went on to theorise this could then be tied to Watergate, since JFK assassination suspects such as E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis later were in on that schtick. Jesse said Nixon was probably set up, because he was getting a bit too interested in finding out what really went down with JFK's murder. That could be considering what was revealed in the Nixon tapes. Unfortunately, such conjecture sounds kookified.

Revelations and gaps on Nixon tapes

In the same conversation, Nixon gave new fodder for conspiracy theorists who question whether Lee Harvey Oswald was the only shooter involved in the assassination of President John Kennedy.

Referring to the report by the Warren Commission, "it was the greatest hoax that has ever been perpetuated," Nixon said. He did not elaborate why he questioned the report.

The grassy knoll has probably been the biggest thorn in the official, lone gunman explanation. Jesse interviewed Bill Newman. Wow, this The Dallas Morning News article features the Newmans as some of the few remaining witnesses still alive. But it doesn't inform the readers where Bill Newman believes the head shot came from. His family was perhaps the closest to the limousine when the fatal shot was fired. I'm not saying this writer is a paid shill. He might simply be the proverbial useful idiot.

With 45 years of practice, Bill Newman repeats what he saw on Nov. 22, 1963, dispassionately and in quick order....

The presidential murder has been so thoroughly investigated, and the witnesses so often interviewed, that their diminishing ranks won't affect the narrative of that weekend in Dallas, said Vincent Bugliosi, author of the exhaustive Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

"If there's any other witness out there and they haven't told the story by now, you can be 99.99 percent sure they don't have anything new to say," said Mr. Bugliosi, who lives in Los Angeles.

Bugliosi comes off bad on the Ventura show. He ends up going Bill O'Reilly cut the mike style on Jesse. According to Bugliosi, there's nothing to see here, move along.

This is what Newman said to Jesse Ventura. He had only been about fifteen feet away from Kennedy, when the most tragic, important bullet was fired.

As the President's car turned left onto Elm Street, probably some 100 feet or less than us, the first two shots rang out.... Just as the car got straight in front of us, the third shot rang out. The side of President Kennedy's head blew off. You could see the brain matter and blood fly up.... I thought the shot had come from directly behind.

Bill Newman was interviewed by the FBI, but the Warren Commission totally ignored him. The photo above this one was taken after the shots had been fired. The Newman's had changed position in order to protect their children. In short, Bill Newman says the head shot came from the grassy knoll. Back and to the left.

Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura JFK assassination deathbed confession part 2

I'm not going to give a play by play analysis of the rest of the video. Folks can check it out for themselves. There were a lot of important things covered. I liked the way Jesse tried to reenact how Oswald could have allegedly fired off three shots in such a short period of time and with such a balky weapon.

The segment on E. Howard Hunt was interesting too. It is also beyond belief that George Bush did not know his whereabouts the day of the shooting. Everyone knew where they were when it happened. I wasn't alive, but for similar big events I will never forget where I was, such as when the Space Challenger blew up or 9/11. George Bush had actually been in Dallas that day according to a declassified document. Wow.

...

Then there's this declassifed FBI document. It's tough to read, but the last paragraph speaks of a George Bush from the CIA. Oooopsies.

Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura JFK assassination deathbed confession part 3

A few years ago, E. Howard Hunt confessed to having been involved in the assassination. He did so on his deathbed. He also looked remarkably similar to one of the famous "three tramps" photographed at Dealey Plaza, as did Frank Sturgis. Debunkers claim professionals deduced differences in the photos that our blind eyes cannot. I think the dudes could have altered their look with makeup. If Hollywood can change an actor's appearance, I'm sure the CIA can. The three tramps had been arrested just to the west of the grassy knoll after being found hanging out in a boxcar. They were well-dressed and clean-shaven for hobos. Somehow the Dallas Police has no record of their arrests, fingerprints, or mug shots. That's not the stuff.

Those adamant Oswald acted alone are full of something stinky. Heck, Oswald might not have been involved in any of the crime. And this is without even asking how the fock Jack Ruby was able to stroll into a police station and kill Lee Harvey Oswald. My gut instinct says the kid was 100% innocent.

Lee Harvey Oswald "I'm just a patsy"

Related links (right click for new windows):
Lee Harvey Oswald interview with William K Stuckey part 1

The Killing Of Lee Harvey Oswald

The Donkeyman Cometh, Assange Probably Trapped by CIA Honeypot, and a Geoengineering Moratorium

2010-12-15T10:36:00.000-05:00

Sofia Wilen and Anna Ardin Accusing Julian Assange of Rape!

So I came across the 1973 movie version of The Iceman Cometh. I was pumped and jacked. It was the final movie done by two greats, Fredric March and Robert Ryan. Problems started straight away. Whoever uploaded the thingie to youtube didn't set the volume loud enough. I dug as hard as I could, but it wasn't ear cheese making the film difficult to hear.

two of the best of all time, no doubt

I also couldn't help but yawn like Leo the MGM Lion. It's not that I'm averse to high brow intellectualism. In fact, as a leftier than thou, I thrive on it. But it was getting late, and I could barely make out the dialogue. I figured let's go mosey over to IMDB and see what the fockers is up with this flick.

The thing runs for nearly four hours. Nope, not gonna watch it. Wouldn't be prudent, as George Bush used to say.

In cases like this, where a movie for whatever reasons is out of my reach to sit through, yet there is a historic troll relevance, I make sure to read up on other sources ensuring I am hip, hep, and that's the stuff.

I began to see amazing similarities between the Hickey salesman character played by Lee Marvin and our capitalist friend donkeytale from Texas, or Texass as he misspellicises it.

Hickey was trying to sell the idea to his anarchist and otherwise drunken barmates that they should give up their pipedreams and boozing. With donkeytale, substitute blogging for the sauce, and they are the same dude.

With his sales pitch, Hickey told the lads he wasn't necessarily telling them to stop their current drinking, only that they eventually should. Eugene O'Neill through Hickey was showing that proselytizing is usually a mere projection of one's own flaws. Donkeytale knows the blogosphere is fake. He knows as a buddhadonkra, that he is part and parcel of its fall from grace. Or in other words, let he who is without sin, cast the first ad hominem.

It turned out Hickey was just trolling. He symbolised the hypocrisy of both the Church and Prohibition Movements. I won't say more, for it would give away the ending, just in case someone actually desires to sit through four hours of a movie or read the play.

This last week, donkeytale got off to a strong start with his Cyber God of Infotainment schtick. He effectively used rhe Assange story as an example of why "community blogging" doesn't work, and that there truly is a fake left. We have seen the fake left, and it is us, blah, blahg, Bertold Blecht.

Something hits the zeitgeist. It then gets chewed on, bubbles are blown, toothpicks are digging away at info kernels getting lodged in one's teeth. It is not so different a process from when we were all glued to the tv watching OJ Simpson being chased by 179 copper cars at ten miles per hour. Then came the trial!

It# Becomes# A# Waste# Of# Time# Exclamation Point.

Dingleberry links to dumbass. Shitforbrains quotes fockface. Greenwald this. Olbermann that. This is how the blogosphere works and ultimately fails. The fake left becomes just another puppet show. Few wait for the dust to settle. Even fewer attempt to make logical sense of whatever dust particles they can trap for analysing.

Here are my few beefs with what donkeytale has done the last week.

*** He cross-posted his schtick way too much. Ok, cross-post the main entry a bunch of places for prepostericity, that's one thing. But now he's cross-posting his ensuing comments at each place? Get yer ice-cold coke. Spam. We've got spam. Anyone ever hear of Clooneygate? That was when Arianna Huffington took a bunch of various interview comments by George Clooney, strung them together out of context, and then promoted it as being an original Clooney blog entry. It was as donkeytale would describe, "RIOTOUS!"

Clooney was justifiably ripped. The piece made him look like an idiot with close to zero writing skills. Donkeytale risks experiencing the same kind of embarrassment from copying and pasting his comments out of context onto threads across the dying soapblox dynasty.

*** I don't like how donkeytale continues to post at blogs that have violated the sacred tenets of free speech. He continues to post at Granny Writing and FSZ despite their grotesque peeing on Peeder's Political Flesh Feast legacy. It should come as no surprise that some of the same people have big time power at both places.

I'm not really trying to rip into donkeytale too much. It's just been a while since I blogged something, and this is the crap I've come up with. Plus, donkeytale lives for this kind of confrontation, even if it isn't really 100% sincere or accurate.

Nonetheless, I do think I've made some good points here. One of his copy and paste spam comments has spread the idea that Ardin as a CIA honeypot has been debunked. I don't think so. I'd like to know more about the company she worked for which has CIA ties. Is this a Hal Turner backfire all over again? The FBI brought charges against him for being a provocateur. But it surfaced that Turner was being paid by the FBI to be an agent provocateur. The FBI continued to go after Turner, and each step of the way they looked like even worse cointelpro chumps than the day before.

Anna Ardin appears to have backed off from her CondomGate allegations and has virtually disappeared. Is this because she has been working for the CIA or some offshoot as Turner received paystubs from the FBI? It's possible her ties to them are a coincidence and don't mean much. I think they do and will provide links so people can decide for themselves.

Donkeytale is trying too hard to say there's no there there and that's that. Granted there isn't much available info on this one aspect. This is a case of us having to wait for the dust to settle or take the initiative and seek out whatever info we can find.

I think Anna Ardin is CIA, and her job was to literally and figuratively fock with Assange evil Janine Bond style. The name is Bond. Janine Bond.

The links are out there. Donkeytale either missed them or is probably CIA. too. I do recall he stood up for Big Al Giordano when that chump was getting his arse kicked at DFQ2 by myself and then The Last Name Left.

Some psychiatrist from San Francisco with a Masters degree put together a blog clinic on this story. I thank him for this.

Assange Accuser Worked with US-Funded, CIA-Tied Anti-Castro Group

Anna Ardin has clearly been fricken CIA; Maybe not an exact employee, but more like doing contract work for them or an affiliate on behalf of their campaign for kinder and gentler imperialism.

Here's a free translation service for Swedish to English. It may not be perfect, but if one looks at those articles she wrote, one can see she was pimping for the CIA's Cuba and "regime change" strategies.

Well-respected McClatchy Newspapers has piped in with its own schtick.

Accuser of WikiLeaks' Assange is Linked to Cuban Dissidents by Juan O. Tamayo

(excerpt) Ardin visited Cuba about four times between 2002 and 2006 as a representative of Swedish social democrats, said Manuel Cuesta Morua, head of Cuba's Arco Progresista, a social-democratic dissident group.

She later wrongly alleged that some European funds for Cuban dissidents had been mishandled, Cuesta Morua said by telephone from Havana. He was told that she was born in Cuba, he added, but never confirmed it with her.

Hmmm. Social Democrats. Aaaah. What their real name should be is the Fake Lefty Party.

Cuba: “very repressive”

(excerpts) Last week, Harold Meyerson, writer for the Washington Post and DSA member, posted a link to Freedom House in his editorial about the importance of the Labor movement. At the Freedom House site you will find a survey of worker freedoms throughout the world. And in that report you will find that Cuba is rated “very repressive”. This will come as no surprise to anyone here at Social Democrats USA. But some members of DSA find attacks on Cuba’s human rights record as “not helpful”....

I continue to be amazed at the number of Communist sympathizers still existing in America’s Left. Report after report, including first hand accounts by American leftists, about the ravages of the Soviet Union, Cuba, and China have been provided over the past 50 years. And yet there are many on the left who choose to ignore them. They look through their rose colored glasses and say things like, “the revolution had its flaws, but its good points too”. Also there’s, “this anti-Castro stuff borders on the old Right-Shactmanite attitude”. Wake up people! Shachtman was right about Communism. It has no place in our efforts as democratic socialists.

Is it me, or is it strange that these better dead than red paranoics share the same party name with Hitler? Why are they so hell-bent on representing themselves as leftists, when they clearly are snot? This author doesn't even know how to italicise newspapers or where to put the punctuation at the end of quotes. I hate to be grammar police, but to be honest, I am sick and tired of all these focking, fake, left tools.

FREEDOM HOUSE=OXYMORON

ANNA ARDIN=CIA ASSET

BET ON IT.

I admit I've done some censorship at DFQ2 which opens me up to accusations of fake lefty hypocrisy. However, I haven't done much of that. There's basically been one or two house trolls I got fed up with. This also isn't that big a blog with that many comments coming through. I'm not saying it's a pizza for one. But it's not one of those Big Al's I'll be over at seven p.m. dinner entrees.

product placement or funny screenshot?

The blogger software just doesn't allow for any supersized blog growth. There is a ceiling. I don't respect donkeytale posting at FSZ. They stole the Peeder legacy and shat on it. My Left Wing was the first anti-Kos blog. It failed. Due to its lame treatment of Francis Holland and others, Peeder started Political Flesh Feast. Certain members there drove him off his own blog, and he closed shop.

Those same people were involved with the creation of FSZ. These are the same people who stabbed DFQ in the back. These are the same people who have banned bloggers despite no rules being broken. They have deleted whole threads and posts depsite again no rules being broken. To repeat, that's the blog which claimed it was taking over Peeder's free speech legacy. I don't understand why donkeytale would still post there. Maybe he is more like Socrates than me. Maybe he feels like remaining at places that don't deserve his presence, as the fake lefties from old-school Athens didn't deserve to be in the same room with the original Socrates. Maybe donkeytale feels he is doing the noble gesture by acting as the defiant "whackjob troll" fighting the good fight against those who have shit on Peeder's legacy. Maybe that's the stuff.

Geoengineering Moratorium

I'll keep this short and simple. One of my few blogger friends Isard has posted the following info.

link to his thread

(excerpt)NAGOYA, Japan – In a landmark consensus decision, the 193-member UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) will close its tenth biennial meeting with a de facto moratorium on geoengineering projects and experiments. “Any private or public experimentation or adventurism intended to manipulate the planetary thermostat will be in violation of this carefully crafted UN consensus,” stated Silvia Ribeiro, Latin American Director of ETC Group.

This is very good news. We don't need no stinking frankenscientists tampering with the skies. Many people would like us to think that all "persistent contrails" are a result of aviation emissions interacting with necessary, atmospheric conditions. While I personally don't believe so-called "chemtrails" are for geoengineering, I do believe this is just one more example of how "chemtrails" as a theory is not akin to saying the moon is made out of cheese.

My blogging schtick used to focus in on this story. My goal was to dekookify the topic. Once that goal was accomplished, I moved on.

Check this out. Here was a patent titled Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin United States Patent 5286979.

This patent may have been withdrawn, but the thing is, the military has declared climate change as an issue of national security. That means they don't have to disclose what they are up to in the skies.

I personally believe the "chemtrails" have been primarily used to protect the Earth's surface from harmful uv-b rays reaching it due to a depleted ozone layer. The problem, however, is that there seems to be a lot of collateral damage, as in a rise in upper respiratory illness and neurological disorders. In short, when it comes to such Dr. Evil bandaid approaches, there are pesky snags called social and legal implications.

Finding one major bit of evidence resulted in myself going with the ozone theory for "chemtrails." Geoengineering would basically take place way up in the stratosphere. Many of these "persistent contrail" events have been witnessed in the troposphere, much too low to bounce solar energy back into space.

Check out what noted experts on the ozone layer, Paul Crutzen and colleague Bruhl had to say about the relationship between ozone and uv-b rays.

Ozone in the troposphere and particularly in the boundary layer play an important role in surface UV budgets. Brühl and Crutzen (1989) indicated the disproportionate role that tropospheric ozone plays in UV-B absorption; more scattering events in the lower atmosphere due to greater molecular and aerosol scattering effectively lengthen the ozone path length in the troposphere, thus making a given quantity of ozone in the troposphere more effective in attenuating UV-B than an equal amount of ozone in the stratosphere.

Related Reading: Geoengineering and Hard Science Made Easy

From the above link, here's what I have left of a Rolling Stone article no longer available at the original link.

Can Dr. Evil Save The World?
Forget about a future filled with wind farms and hydrogen cars. The Pentagon's top weaponeer says he has a radical solution that would stop global warming now -- no matter how much oil we burn

JEFF GOODELL
Nov 03, 2006

Illustration by Jonathan Barkat