This blog is dedicated to the memory of David Weintraub, who took on insidious astroturfers and won.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

No, I'm actually not a right wing operative

Karl Rove is not really my uncle despite internet rumours

I don't feel too comfortable blogging about my personal situation. There is a lot going on in the background, and it's best for me not to share that. It's not that I don't want to.

Since the cybersmears are so outrageous and clearly untrue, there is no rush for me to confront them right now in a public forum. Perhaps in the future, make that probably, I will. What is being done to me, in lack of a better word, is illegal. So please be patient. All in good time. And if you can make it through my schtick below, there will be a treat at the end.

Here was my response finished mere minutes ago to Patterico's The Increasing Thuggery of the Fringe Left

There is no real left in America. I find it humorous how so many of you actually think people like Markos Moulitsas and Arianna Huffington represent the left. Or that Obama is a socialist.

The funny part of this is Patterico seems to think his blog has some form of political push or gravitas. No one cares about blogs. No one in “real life” cares what any of us think.

People go to the net for sports, stock #’s, the weather, to use email, etc..

Maybe most of you think the people cybersmearing me are part and parcel of this so-called fringe left or simply left as someone put it. No, they are not. Not even close.

If I had to guess, the people who helped force Weiner into resigning are simply on another Democrat’s payroll or of the old boy’s headquarters. Those aren’t the left. Have you never heard of triangulation?

That convolution, imho, is becoming clearer by the day. And you’re falling into the trap by succumbing to the same old same old libtard versus repukelican script.

Obama’s gonna get re-elected. His job bill was a masterful political move. Now Bill Clinton has come out with some opinions. Your only chance for conservative ideology to succeed politically is to also triangulate yourselves. If you don’t move to the left and soon, forget it. You won’t be winning the Presidency again for a very long time.

So keep yapping like know-it-alls of how evil the left is, and you’ll find yourselves more and more aligned with the fringe on the right.

You should be pushing for Ron Paul. Better yet, you need to find someone with a similar antiwar platform who doesn’t seem as nutty with everything else.

People want jobs. They want low taxes for regular people. They don’t want cuts in health care, schools, road repairs, you name it. The right historically has whined so much about spending, but take a good look at how much national debt was amassed under Reagan, Bush, and Bush. Look at how under Clinton, the budget deficit was drastically reduced and perhaps eliminated, and a plan was on its way to start paying off the national debt. It is because of Clinton that interest rates started to drop. The only reason they dropped under Bush was because they had nothing left in which to prop up their illegal war economy.

Most of you seem to be preaching to your own ever diminishing choir. You better hope voting apathy continues. Because the more people are registered, the more likely it is the Republican Party eventually branches off. Right now the Democratic Party is a blend of Republican and Democrat. The Republicans as constituted are turning into the main stream fringe.

You guys need to wake up and smell the inequality and collective fear for the future. People are tired of high unemployment. You may actually lose Florida. It’s been close of late. You guys are living in a plastic bubble if you actually believe things are looking good for your party’s political prospects.

People are sick of both parties. They are sick of these word games. They are tired of the Patterico’s of the world blabbing about the fringe left.

The dude’s a prosecutor in Los Angeles. He has more dogma than academic background. I just found out Breitbart is basically a regular guy for an extreme right winger who’s found 15 minutes of fame. I heard his bloggers aren’t even paid. He’s a big fish in a small pond, bigger than most of us, but not really in the grand scam of social reality. I’m telling you, this libtard versus repukelican noise pollution act has gotten beyond stale. No one is listening, and no one cares.

Treat Time: For those looking for some good entertainment, check out my youtube page. God bless the audience. p:>

1,676 likes, 14 dislikes


the_last_name_left said...

I suspect you're right.

as in correct. ;)

socrates said...

Apparently you are involved too as The Last Brain Left. But I've yet to socratise that and am not sure if I will.

I'm sorry a lot of your comments got deleted along with my entries. I have it all saved. Perhaps someday it will all be reposted. One idea I have is to reload facts without any commentary. Free speech has turned out to be an oxymoron. It runs at about 40-50 grand, kind of too steep for regular guys. :(

the_last_name_left said...

Hey, chin-up old boy? You might get a victory yet, no?

Don't get too down? Easy for me to say, I guess, but.....the future is unwritten, yes?

socrates said...

Thanks for the sentiments.

I think I have figured out what the major stumbling block is. Please consider this as a possibility. Neal Rauhauser might be on the FBI payroll. Akin to the Hal Turner story, he thinks he can say and write anything. These are the situations authorities end up in when they rely on immoral informers. This is a thoery that makes too much sense and cannot be easily debunked nor proven. But it makes sense in an occam's razor kind of way.

I see no other explanation for how he gets away with online crimes, even after they have been reported.

Neal Rauhauser is some version of Hal Turner but for the left.

He speaks of having weapons. He doesn't actually believe his life is in jeopardy for fighting against neocons and whatnot through blogs and twitter. He is armed because he knows there are many people who would love to smash his skull in due to those online activities.

As a vegetarian, I'd never lay a finger on him. Nonetheless, if someone beats on Neal Rauhauser, it will have been his own fault. The guy is literally asking to be physically confronted.

If he is being protected by the FBI, then f*** the FBI and their corruption. I will keep after the FBI until I get an answer one way or another. Their response to this situation may decide whether I stay or leave this armpit of a country.

The future is unwritten, true. But that doesn't mean the future has easy odds. You should know that as a socialist, thinker bloke. Anyway, it looks like my cointelpro schtick hasn't been that far off. Sure it got a bit goofy in places. But for the most part, I nailed it. Otherwise, why hasn't that creep been arrested?

the_last_name_left said...

Who is he? Never heard of him, so I can't possibly comment.

Hey, like you said in your blog, just state the facts....don't say things which leave yourself open to attack.

Who controls the past controls the future, sure.....sort of. But nobody controls the past - I don't believe it. My past is mine, and mine alone. Blogger never stopped me saying anything I want. I never said anything they don't like? Hmmm.....I doubt it. There's a lot of room to say whatever one likes, but nobody can be expected to take a hit for providing a platform to say a load of shit that opens them up to attack. Which is what makes you suspicious of various peeps, I guess, because they seem able to.

But let's not forget, Hal Turner got his arse busted - enough to discredit him everywhere, no?

There's a lot of space to say what one wants. Ok, nobody is listening.....but...there we go. That's the position.

As ever, I don't much care whether people are cointel pro or whatever.....I think things should be judged on their content. What can cointel pro or whatever seriously add? In that sense, they're no danger at all imo. It's still up to individuals to respond in whatever fashion they deem fit.

socrates said...

I'm gonna try that with a new entry, simply post some open source info with no commentary. As for the cointelpro schtick, I think you misunderstand a bit what my point is. These are not FBI or pure internet cointelpro. They are receiving a paycheck to entice "terroristic" responses. Hal Turner thought it meant a blank check to commit cyber crimes. I'm hoping this other person, who is mostly known for trying to incite tea party people, will also be brought to justice. He seems to be allowed to make criminal posts without fear of being arraigned. This is happening in broad, cyber daylight. Why hasn't he already been arrested? This is why my hunch is he has been receiving FBI paychecks in return for his most sadistic, internet activities as an agent provocateur. I'm sorry if that sounds kooky, but in previous posts I have proven that this type of schtuff is going on.

the_last_name_left said...

no, no, not saying it is kooky.....just giving my position ie that what people write discredits them anyway, no need to prove co-intel-pro etc (which is likely impossible anyway)'s safer

that's all ;)

socrates said...

It is tough if not impossible to prove such a connection with individual bloggers. It was done with Hal Turner. So now we have an example of what to look for, basically websites that seem to provoke violent comments. Even then, such citations would still lie in the realm of probability rather than being proven. More hmmm than aha.

It would be safest for me not to comment at all on that thingie that has led to I believe 21 entries being deleted. I'm just thinking maybe if I simply post things with links, put up screenshots, etc. without commentary, I may be ok. A lot of great stuff got deleted for reasons I will eventually explain in full. I have already pointed out that lawyers found who would take the case wanted 40-50 grand. I did find one who would take it on a $5 thousand retainer, but even that amount was unattainable.

There is much more to explain. I will try to eventually.

Thanks for your posts. I wish I could post more on your blog. I'll try to. But real life is calling. That is, real life in regards to my internet life. It's tricky that way. I do feel urges to blog, but I need to be careful, at least for now. There are a lot of lying thugs in this world, and a few of them are criminally abusing my right to freedom of speech and to be free of slanderous accusations. I know libel is the better word, but let's face it, blogging is quite often as if we were speaking.