I had to go to a rag called heavy.com to locate a picture of this dude. The police said they would name him once and that would be it. They want the emphasis to be on the victims. We've heard that sort of thing before. It makes sense to not glorify murderers. But this kind of feels like Mothers Against Drunk Driving when a good idea goes too far in the opposite direction.
Perhaps the ptb's love my schtick as I provide unpaid soft disclosure cupcakes and opinion. They do scan everything posted on social media. That's why often times it seems that different websites and threads are lifting from others. They also are personalising our journeys through the internet. Of course the microphones are also taking in information from anything we say in so-called real life.
They have legalised propaganda. They have also made legal what was revealed by Snowden documents in regards to online covert agents and the cyber magician program. It's about this screenshot in particular and why I have posted it a lot:
This one too seems to explain in a nutshell what we are up against in regards to social media:
The schtick theft is not paranoia either. They mirror and mimic original conjecture and whatnot:
They want newbies and those still connecting dots to remain within demented medium loops. Perhaps I am pretty good at this stuff and others are also, but we get isolated. Then our junk is stolen. Say the real people provide a punch bowl. The Spy Factory steals the work and then adds a turd.
My first idea is hmmmm, it's a Black guy. Usually this is disgruntled white man falling down? Like how most school shootings are thought to be done by caucasians. Think stereotypes.
Everything gets mushed into the deep state propaganda computers. The conspiracy sites will probably lift this blog entry and twist it into the black-white fracture point. That's my initial reaction to why it's tough to find this guy's face.
The tragedy will be plugged into the status quo of demented medium loops and then it will be forgotten. Same as the man who burned himself in Washington, D.C..
The AJC has some info on him, but not his picture. He was in the military and well-educated. He was still employed there, so this wasn't necessarily a disgruntled worker in the traditional sense.
Maybe mainstream media are showing his face, but I've yet to see it.
No comments:
Post a Comment